The Effects of Single Session Whole-Body Vibration Training Applied at Different Mechanical Vibration Frequencies on Arterial Stiffness and Heart Rate Variability in Hypertensive Patients.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Journal of Aging and Physical Activity Pub Date : 2025-10-14 Print Date: 2026-06-01 DOI:10.1123/japa.2024-0388
Bilge Köksal, Sema Savci, Aylin Tanriverdi Eyolcu, Buse Özcan Kahraman, Ebru Özpelit
{"title":"The Effects of Single Session Whole-Body Vibration Training Applied at Different Mechanical Vibration Frequencies on Arterial Stiffness and Heart Rate Variability in Hypertensive Patients.","authors":"Bilge Köksal, Sema Savci, Aylin Tanriverdi Eyolcu, Buse Özcan Kahraman, Ebru Özpelit","doi":"10.1123/japa.2024-0388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>There is limited information about which frequency of the mechanical vibration is more effective in whole-body vibration training in the hypertensive population. The aim of this study was to compare the acute effects of whole-body vibration training on arterial stiffness, heart rate variability, blood pressure, perceived exertion, energy expenditure, and muscle strength using different mechanical vibration frequencies in hypertensive patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-eight individuals diagnosed with hypertension between the ages of 40 and 70 years old participated in this crossover study. Whole-body vibration intervention were performed in random order on different days, with an amplitude of 2-4 mm and three different mechanical vibration frequencies of 0, 25, and 40 Hz. The mechanical vibration device used in the study produced vertical oscillations. A total of five additional exercises were performed in a single session, and each session lasted 15 min. Arterial stiffness was assessed using a noninvasive method, which can perform automatic measurements with a cuff. Heart rate variability was assessed using a 5-min electrocardiography recording. Lower-extremity muscle strength and energy expenditure were assessed using a digital dynamometer and an activity monitor, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant main effect of time for heart rate, respiratory rate, perceived effort, systolic blood pressure, augmentation index at a heart rate of 75 beats per minute, pulse pressure, mean arterial pressure, high-frequency power, and quadriceps muscle strength (p < .05). However, there was no significant frequency effect for changes in all variables (p > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Following whole-body vibration application at mechanical vibration frequencies of 0, 25, and 40 Hz; acute responses on heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, perceived exertion, arterial stiffness, heart rate variability, muscle strength, and energy expenditure produced similar effects. Significance/Implications: More studies investigating the frequency effects of whole-body vibration training applied at different mechanical vibration frequencies on acute responses will provide further guidance for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":51073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity","volume":" ","pages":"339-349"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2024-0388","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: There is limited information about which frequency of the mechanical vibration is more effective in whole-body vibration training in the hypertensive population. The aim of this study was to compare the acute effects of whole-body vibration training on arterial stiffness, heart rate variability, blood pressure, perceived exertion, energy expenditure, and muscle strength using different mechanical vibration frequencies in hypertensive patients.

Methods: Thirty-eight individuals diagnosed with hypertension between the ages of 40 and 70 years old participated in this crossover study. Whole-body vibration intervention were performed in random order on different days, with an amplitude of 2-4 mm and three different mechanical vibration frequencies of 0, 25, and 40 Hz. The mechanical vibration device used in the study produced vertical oscillations. A total of five additional exercises were performed in a single session, and each session lasted 15 min. Arterial stiffness was assessed using a noninvasive method, which can perform automatic measurements with a cuff. Heart rate variability was assessed using a 5-min electrocardiography recording. Lower-extremity muscle strength and energy expenditure were assessed using a digital dynamometer and an activity monitor, respectively.

Results: There was a significant main effect of time for heart rate, respiratory rate, perceived effort, systolic blood pressure, augmentation index at a heart rate of 75 beats per minute, pulse pressure, mean arterial pressure, high-frequency power, and quadriceps muscle strength (p < .05). However, there was no significant frequency effect for changes in all variables (p > .05).

Conclusion: Following whole-body vibration application at mechanical vibration frequencies of 0, 25, and 40 Hz; acute responses on heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, perceived exertion, arterial stiffness, heart rate variability, muscle strength, and energy expenditure produced similar effects. Significance/Implications: More studies investigating the frequency effects of whole-body vibration training applied at different mechanical vibration frequencies on acute responses will provide further guidance for future research.

不同机械振动频率单次全身振动训练对高血压患者动脉僵硬度和心率变异性的影响。
背景/目的:在高血压人群的全身振动训练中,机械振动的哪个频率更有效的信息有限。本研究的目的是比较不同机械振动频率下高血压患者全身振动训练对动脉僵硬度、心率变异性、血压、感知劳累、能量消耗和肌肉力量的急性影响。方法:38名年龄在40至70岁之间的高血压患者参与了这项交叉研究。在不同天数随机进行全身振动干预,振幅为2 ~ 4 mm,机械振动频率为0、25、40 Hz。研究中使用的机械振动装置产生垂直振动。在一个单独的会话中,总共进行了五个额外的练习,每个会话持续15分钟。动脉硬度采用无创方法进行评估,该方法可以使用袖带进行自动测量。采用5分钟心电图记录评估心率变异性。下肢肌肉力量和能量消耗分别使用数字测功仪和活动监测器进行评估。结果:时间对心率、呼吸频率、感知用力、收缩压、心率为75次/分时的增强指数、脉压、平均动脉压、高频功率和股四头肌力量有显著的主要影响(p < 0.05)。然而,所有变量的变化没有显著的频率效应(p < 0.05)。结论:在0、25和40 Hz的机械振动频率下进行全身振动应用;对心率、血压、呼吸频率、感知劳累、动脉僵硬度、心率变异性、肌肉力量和能量消耗的急性反应产生类似的效果。意义/启示:更多研究不同机械振动频率下全身振动训练对急性反应的频率效应,将为今后的研究提供进一步的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging and Physical Activity (JAPA) is a multidisciplinary journal that publishes peer-reviewed original research reports, scholarly reviews, and professional-application articles on the relationship between physical activity and the aging process. The journal encourages the submission of articles that can contribute to an understanding of (a) the impact of physical activity on physiological, psychological, and social aspects of older adults and (b) the effect of advancing age or the aging process on physical activity among older adults. In addition to publishing research reports and reviews, JAPA publishes articles that examine the development, implementation, and evaluation of physical activity programs among older adults. Articles from the biological, behavioral, and social sciences, as well as from fields such as medicine, clinical psychology, physical and recreational therapy, health, physical education, and recreation, are appropriate for the journal. Studies using animal models do not fit within our mission statement and should be submitted elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书