Managers' experiences of work capacity in employees with depression and anxiety.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Lisa Björk, Jenny Hultquist, Gunnel Hensing, Monica Bertilsson
{"title":"Managers' experiences of work capacity in employees with depression and anxiety.","authors":"Lisa Björk, Jenny Hultquist, Gunnel Hensing, Monica Bertilsson","doi":"10.1080/11038128.2025.2570900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Levels of sickness absence due to common mental disorders (CMD) vary between industrial sectors and managers are key for prevention and rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess industry differences in managers' experiences and ratings of work capacity in employees with depression and anxiety.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Differences between industries in managers' (<i>n</i> = 1819) experiences were investigated by chi-squared tests and managers' ratings were analysed through MANCOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of managers who had experienced several employees with depression and anxiety was higher in municipalities and counties, and in industries with people as the main work object such as education, health and social care settings, compared with other industries. There was no significant effect of industry on managers' ratings of how work capacity is affected by depression and anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Having experienced several employees with common mental disorders is more common among managers of female dominated service sectors, but managers rate capacity to work in employees with depression and anxiety similarly, irrespective of industrial sector.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>It is important that managers receive the support they need to handle employees with reduced work capacity due to CMD, however, support does not need to be tailored to different industries.</p>","PeriodicalId":49570,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"32 1","pages":"2570900"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2025.2570900","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Levels of sickness absence due to common mental disorders (CMD) vary between industrial sectors and managers are key for prevention and rehabilitation.

Objective: To assess industry differences in managers' experiences and ratings of work capacity in employees with depression and anxiety.

Material and methods: Differences between industries in managers' (n = 1819) experiences were investigated by chi-squared tests and managers' ratings were analysed through MANCOVA.

Results: The proportion of managers who had experienced several employees with depression and anxiety was higher in municipalities and counties, and in industries with people as the main work object such as education, health and social care settings, compared with other industries. There was no significant effect of industry on managers' ratings of how work capacity is affected by depression and anxiety.

Conclusions: Having experienced several employees with common mental disorders is more common among managers of female dominated service sectors, but managers rate capacity to work in employees with depression and anxiety similarly, irrespective of industrial sector.

Significance: It is important that managers receive the support they need to handle employees with reduced work capacity due to CMD, however, support does not need to be tailored to different industries.

管理者对抑郁焦虑员工工作能力的体验。
背景:常见精神障碍(CMD)导致的病假水平因工业部门而异,管理人员是预防和康复的关键。目的:探讨管理者对抑郁、焦虑员工工作能力评价的行业差异。材料和方法:采用卡方检验调查不同行业管理者(n = 1819)经历的差异,并通过方差分析分析管理者的评分。结果:市、县、教育、卫生、社会护理等以人为主要工作对象的行业中,经历过多名员工抑郁、焦虑的管理者比例高于其他行业。行业对管理者对抑郁和焦虑对工作能力的影响程度的评分没有显著影响。结论:在女性主导的服务行业中,经历过几名常见精神障碍的员工在管理人员中更为常见,但无论在哪个行业,管理人员对患有抑郁症和焦虑症的员工的工作能力的评价都相似。意义:重要的是,管理人员得到他们需要的支持,以处理由于CMD导致的工作能力下降的员工,然而,支持不需要针对不同的行业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy is an internationally well-recognized journal that aims to provide a forum for occupational therapy research worldwide and especially the Nordic countries. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy welcomes: theoretical frameworks, original research reports emanating from quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies, literature reviews, case studies, presentation and evaluation of instruments, evaluation of interventions, learning and teaching in OT, letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书