Outcomes of prosthetic and orthotic use in individuals with a minor lower extremity amputation: A scoping review.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Ahmed Dami, Élise Mahé-Duverger, Maxime Acien, Virginie Blanchette, Gabriel Moisan
{"title":"Outcomes of prosthetic and orthotic use in individuals with a minor lower extremity amputation: A scoping review.","authors":"Ahmed Dami, Élise Mahé-Duverger, Maxime Acien, Virginie Blanchette, Gabriel Moisan","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Restoring independent daily activity is crucial for patients with a lower extremity amputation. Amputations at or distal to the midtarsal level pose unique challenges, necessitating specialized prosthetic and orthotic interventions to improve functionality, wellness, and quality of life. The objective of this scoping review was to examine the impact of prosthetic and orthotic use on clinical and health care outcomes in adults with a minor lower extremity amputation. Following Arksey and O'Malley's framework and the updated Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology, a systematic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, APA PsycInfo, Scopus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, was conducted. Fifty-nine relevant studies, primarily originating from the United States of America and Australia, were included. Trauma (47.5%) and diabetes (35.6%) were the leading causes of amputation. The most reported biomechanical outcomes were gait alterations (49.2%), revealing deficits and improvements in spatiotemporal parameters (33.9%), and plantar pressure distribution (22.0%). Custom-made devices insertable into the shoe, such as toe fillers and foot orthoses, enhanced walking speed and plantar pressure distribution, whereas above-ankle devices were more effective than foot orthoses in more proximal amputations. Well-fitted devices increased satisfaction and quality of life, but economic impacts were less frequently addressed. Despite most of the included studies being case reports (23.7%), which have a higher risk of bias, the review underscores the essential role of prosthetic and orthotic prescriptions based on tailored patient-centered care. The findings highlight the need for higher-quality research considering cost, and a broader range of patient-related outcomes and experiences measures, including psycho-social aspects.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":" ","pages":"465-482"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000486","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Restoring independent daily activity is crucial for patients with a lower extremity amputation. Amputations at or distal to the midtarsal level pose unique challenges, necessitating specialized prosthetic and orthotic interventions to improve functionality, wellness, and quality of life. The objective of this scoping review was to examine the impact of prosthetic and orthotic use on clinical and health care outcomes in adults with a minor lower extremity amputation. Following Arksey and O'Malley's framework and the updated Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology, a systematic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, APA PsycInfo, Scopus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, was conducted. Fifty-nine relevant studies, primarily originating from the United States of America and Australia, were included. Trauma (47.5%) and diabetes (35.6%) were the leading causes of amputation. The most reported biomechanical outcomes were gait alterations (49.2%), revealing deficits and improvements in spatiotemporal parameters (33.9%), and plantar pressure distribution (22.0%). Custom-made devices insertable into the shoe, such as toe fillers and foot orthoses, enhanced walking speed and plantar pressure distribution, whereas above-ankle devices were more effective than foot orthoses in more proximal amputations. Well-fitted devices increased satisfaction and quality of life, but economic impacts were less frequently addressed. Despite most of the included studies being case reports (23.7%), which have a higher risk of bias, the review underscores the essential role of prosthetic and orthotic prescriptions based on tailored patient-centered care. The findings highlight the need for higher-quality research considering cost, and a broader range of patient-related outcomes and experiences measures, including psycho-social aspects.

假肢和矫形器在轻度下肢截肢患者中的应用:一项范围综述。
恢复独立的日常活动对下肢截肢患者至关重要。跗骨中段或远端截肢带来了独特的挑战,需要专门的假肢和矫形器干预来改善功能,健康和生活质量。本综述的目的是研究假肢和矫形器的使用对成人轻度下肢截肢的临床和卫生保健结果的影响。遵循Arksey和O'Malley的框架和更新的Joanna Briggs研究所的方法,对MEDLINE、CINAHL、SPORTDiscus、APA PsycInfo、Scopus和Cochrane系统综述数据库进行了系统搜索。其中包括主要来自美利坚合众国和澳大利亚的59项相关研究。创伤(47.5%)和糖尿病(35.6%)是导致截肢的主要原因。报告最多的生物力学结果是步态改变(49.2%),揭示时空参数的缺陷和改善(33.9%)和足底压力分布(22.0%)。可插入鞋内的定制装置,如脚趾填充物和足部矫形器,可提高步行速度和足底压力分布,而脚踝以上的装置在更近端截肢时比足部矫形器更有效。合适的设备提高了满意度和生活质量,但经济影响较少被提及。尽管大多数纳入的研究是病例报告(23.7%),有较高的偏倚风险,但该综述强调了基于以患者为中心的量身定制护理的假肢和矫形器处方的重要作用。研究结果强调,考虑到成本,以及更广泛的与患者相关的结果和经验测量,包括心理社会方面,需要更高质量的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书