Braiding traditional ecological knowledge and Western science in the management of freshwater social-ecological systems: a systematic map protocol.

IF 5.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ronald J Maliao, Béla Tóthmérész
{"title":"Braiding traditional ecological knowledge and Western science in the management of freshwater social-ecological systems: a systematic map protocol.","authors":"Ronald J Maliao, Béla Tóthmérész","doi":"10.1186/s13750-025-00371-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Freshwater ecosystems are globally imperiled, with monitored vertebrate populations showing an average 83% decline since 1970. Braiding Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) with Western science is increasingly recognized by global bodies like the IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services) as essential for achieving the transformative change needed to address this crisis. This systematic map provides a comprehensive, global synthesis of the diverse methodologies used for this purpose by answering the primary question: What is the evidence base for methodologies (approaches, frameworks, or models) that braid the TEK of Indigenous and local communities with Western science in the planning, management, monitoring, or assessment of freshwater social-ecological systems? The resulting synthesis is intended to empower researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to design more effective and equitable management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Collaboration for Environmental Evidence (CEE) guidelines, our protocol employs a multi-layered search strategy across three core bibliographic databases, targeted grey literature sources (including dissertations and key organizational websites), and a supplementary review-centric snowballing search. Records will be screened for eligibility in a two-stage process (Title/Abstract and Full-text) with robust consistency checking to ensure transparency and minimize bias. Data from included articles will be coded using a detailed protocol designed to answer our secondary questions and build a typology of knowledge braiding methodologies. The systematic map's outputs will include a narrative synthesis identifying knowledge gaps and clusters, a comprehensive public database of included studies, and a suite of interactive data visualizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48621,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Evidence","volume":"14 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Evidence","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-025-00371-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Freshwater ecosystems are globally imperiled, with monitored vertebrate populations showing an average 83% decline since 1970. Braiding Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) with Western science is increasingly recognized by global bodies like the IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services) as essential for achieving the transformative change needed to address this crisis. This systematic map provides a comprehensive, global synthesis of the diverse methodologies used for this purpose by answering the primary question: What is the evidence base for methodologies (approaches, frameworks, or models) that braid the TEK of Indigenous and local communities with Western science in the planning, management, monitoring, or assessment of freshwater social-ecological systems? The resulting synthesis is intended to empower researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to design more effective and equitable management strategies.

Methods: Following Collaboration for Environmental Evidence (CEE) guidelines, our protocol employs a multi-layered search strategy across three core bibliographic databases, targeted grey literature sources (including dissertations and key organizational websites), and a supplementary review-centric snowballing search. Records will be screened for eligibility in a two-stage process (Title/Abstract and Full-text) with robust consistency checking to ensure transparency and minimize bias. Data from included articles will be coded using a detailed protocol designed to answer our secondary questions and build a typology of knowledge braiding methodologies. The systematic map's outputs will include a narrative synthesis identifying knowledge gaps and clusters, a comprehensive public database of included studies, and a suite of interactive data visualizations.

传统生态学知识与西方科学在淡水社会生态系统管理中的结合:一个系统的地图协议。
背景:淡水生态系统在全球范围内处于危险之中,监测到的脊椎动物种群数量自1970年以来平均下降了83%。像IPBES(生物多样性和生态系统服务政府间科学政策平台)这样的全球性机构越来越多地认识到,将传统生态知识与西方科学结合起来,对于实现解决这一危机所需的变革至关重要。这张系统的地图通过回答以下主要问题,提供了用于此目的的各种方法的全面、全球综合:在淡水社会生态系统的规划、管理、监测或评估中,将土著和当地社区的TEK与西方科学结合起来的方法(方法、框架或模型)的证据基础是什么?由此产生的综合旨在使研究人员、从业人员和决策者能够设计更有效和公平的管理战略。方法:遵循环境证据协作(CEE)指南,我们的协议采用了跨三个核心书目数据库的多层搜索策略,目标灰色文献来源(包括论文和关键组织网站),以及补充的以综述为中心的滚雪球搜索。记录将通过两个阶段的过程(标题/摘要和全文)进行筛选,并进行强有力的一致性检查,以确保透明度并最大限度地减少偏见。纳入文章的数据将使用详细的协议进行编码,旨在回答我们的次要问题并建立知识编织方法的类型。系统地图的输出将包括识别知识差距和集群的叙述性综合,包含研究的综合公共数据库,以及一套交互式数据可视化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Evidence
Environmental Evidence Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
18.20%
发文量
36
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental Evidence is the journal of the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence (CEE). The Journal facilitates rapid publication of evidence syntheses, in the form of Systematic Reviews and Maps conducted to CEE Guidelines and Standards. We focus on the effectiveness of environmental management interventions and the impact of human activities on the environment. Our scope covers all forms of environmental management and human impacts and therefore spans the natural and social sciences. Subjects include water security, agriculture, food security, forestry, fisheries, natural resource management, biodiversity conservation, climate change, ecosystem services, pollution, invasive species, environment and human wellbeing, sustainable energy use, soil management, environmental legislation, environmental education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信