Three-year clinical performance of different monolithic single CAD/CAM crowns. A randomized controlled clinical trial.

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Pune N Paqué, Sohail Saeed, Caroline Fischer, Alexis Ioannidis, Ronald E Jung, Nadja Naenni
{"title":"Three-year clinical performance of different monolithic single CAD/CAM crowns. A randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Pune N Paqué, Sohail Saeed, Caroline Fischer, Alexis Ioannidis, Ronald E Jung, Nadja Naenni","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The objective of the present study was to evaluate the survival rate and clinical performance of three CAD/CAM materials used for the fabrication of monolithic single crowns: lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LiSi); feldspathic ceramic (FC); and polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty patients requiring a maxillary or mandibular posterior single crown were included in the present prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three study groups (LiSi, FC, PICN). The primary outcome was survival; the secondary outcomes were biologic and technical parameters as well as modified-USPHS (mUSPHS, United States Public Health Service) criteria. Outcomes were assessed after crown insertion at baseline (BL) and at a 1- and 3-year follow-up (1y-FU, 3y-FU). Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier curves, with the log-rank test for survival and the Kruskal-Wallis test for the comparison of biologic and technical parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the 3y-FU, the survival rate was 100% for both LiSi and PICN crowns, while FC crowns exhibited a significantly lower survival of 76.9% (P = 0.039). The failures in the FC group were attributed to three complete crown fractures. Regarding the secondary outcomes, PICN crowns showed significantly more plaque accumulation than FC and LiSi crowns after 1 and 3 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Monolithic single crowns fabricated using CAD/CAM techniques, specifically in LiSi and PICN, demonstrated high survival rates at the 3y-FU. However, crowns made of FC showed a higher rate of both minor and catastrophic fractures. Therefore, the use of FC may not be recommended for single posterior crowns, especially when restoring teeth with reduced tooth substance.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>The present study highlights the clinical superiority of LiSi and PICN over FC for single crowns in the posterior region, with LiSi and PICN showing significantly higher 3-year survival rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":46271,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry","volume":"20 4","pages":"394-409"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the survival rate and clinical performance of three CAD/CAM materials used for the fabrication of monolithic single crowns: lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LiSi); feldspathic ceramic (FC); and polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN).

Materials and methods: Fifty patients requiring a maxillary or mandibular posterior single crown were included in the present prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three study groups (LiSi, FC, PICN). The primary outcome was survival; the secondary outcomes were biologic and technical parameters as well as modified-USPHS (mUSPHS, United States Public Health Service) criteria. Outcomes were assessed after crown insertion at baseline (BL) and at a 1- and 3-year follow-up (1y-FU, 3y-FU). Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier curves, with the log-rank test for survival and the Kruskal-Wallis test for the comparison of biologic and technical parameters.

Results: At the 3y-FU, the survival rate was 100% for both LiSi and PICN crowns, while FC crowns exhibited a significantly lower survival of 76.9% (P = 0.039). The failures in the FC group were attributed to three complete crown fractures. Regarding the secondary outcomes, PICN crowns showed significantly more plaque accumulation than FC and LiSi crowns after 1 and 3 years.

Conclusions: Monolithic single crowns fabricated using CAD/CAM techniques, specifically in LiSi and PICN, demonstrated high survival rates at the 3y-FU. However, crowns made of FC showed a higher rate of both minor and catastrophic fractures. Therefore, the use of FC may not be recommended for single posterior crowns, especially when restoring teeth with reduced tooth substance.

Clinical implications: The present study highlights the clinical superiority of LiSi and PICN over FC for single crowns in the posterior region, with LiSi and PICN showing significantly higher 3-year survival rates.

不同单片CAD/CAM冠的三年临床表现。一项随机对照临床试验。
目的:本研究的目的是评估三种CAD/CAM材料用于制作整体单冠的存活率和临床性能:二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷(LiSi);长石陶瓷(FC);聚合物渗透陶瓷网络(PICN)。材料和方法:本前瞻性随机对照临床试验纳入了50例需要上颌或下颌后牙单冠的患者。患者被随机分配到三个研究组(LiSi, FC, PICN)中的一个。主要结局是生存;次要结果是生物学和技术参数以及修订的usphs (mUSPHS,美国公共卫生服务)标准。在基线(BL)和1年和3年随访(1y-FU, 3y-FU)时评估冠植入后的结果。统计分析包括描述性统计和Kaplan-Meier曲线,采用log-rank生存检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验比较生物和技术参数。结果:在3y-FU时,LiSi和PICN冠的存活率均为100%,而FC冠的存活率为76.9% (P = 0.039)。FC组失败的原因是三次全冠骨折。至于次要结果,PICN冠在1年和3年后的斑块积累明显多于FC和LiSi冠。结论:采用CAD/CAM技术制作的整体单冠,特别是在LiSi和PICN中,在3y-FU表现出较高的存活率。然而,由FC制成的冠显示出更高的轻微和灾难性骨折率。因此,对于单个后牙冠,特别是在修复牙质减少的牙齿时,可能不推荐使用氟化碳。临床意义:本研究强调了LiSi和PICN在后牙区单冠治疗中的临床优势,LiSi和PICN的3年生存率明显高于FC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry
International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书