Assessing the Lethality of Suicide Attempts: Adding Chance of Rescue to Medical Severity.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Tormod Stangeland, Ketil Hanssen-Bauer, Linn-Ingunn Lynum, Karen Margrethe Walaas Nedberge, Johan Siqveland
{"title":"Assessing the Lethality of Suicide Attempts: Adding Chance of Rescue to Medical Severity.","authors":"Tormod Stangeland, Ketil Hanssen-Bauer, Linn-Ingunn Lynum, Karen Margrethe Walaas Nedberge, Johan Siqveland","doi":"10.1111/sltb.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emphasis on medical severity when assessing the lethality of suicide attempts may overlook important contextual factors. We examined if distinguishing between medical severity and chance of rescue improves evaluation and understanding of suicidal mental states.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy adolescent inpatients with a recent suicide attempt were interviewed with the Suicide Intent Scale, and clinicians rated the Risk-Rescue Rating Scale, which provides separate ratings for medical severity (Risk) and chance of rescue (Rescue). They also completed the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire and Fearlessness about Death scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lethality components Risk and Rescue were uncorrelated (r = -0.02). However, Rescue was significantly negatively correlated with suicidal intent (r = -0.46), fearlessness about death (r = -0.29), and unmet interpersonal needs (r = -0.28), while Risk was only correlated with suicidal intent (r = 0.29). In a hierarchical regression model, Rescue was the strongest predictor of suicidal intent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rescue factors, more than medical severity factors, were consistently related to our measures of suicidal mental state. Including the rescue component in lethality assessments may improve both the accuracy of clinical evaluations and our understanding of adolescents' mental state during suicidal crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":39684,"journal":{"name":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","volume":"55 5","pages":"e70058"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.70058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Emphasis on medical severity when assessing the lethality of suicide attempts may overlook important contextual factors. We examined if distinguishing between medical severity and chance of rescue improves evaluation and understanding of suicidal mental states.

Methods: Seventy adolescent inpatients with a recent suicide attempt were interviewed with the Suicide Intent Scale, and clinicians rated the Risk-Rescue Rating Scale, which provides separate ratings for medical severity (Risk) and chance of rescue (Rescue). They also completed the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire and Fearlessness about Death scale.

Results: The lethality components Risk and Rescue were uncorrelated (r = -0.02). However, Rescue was significantly negatively correlated with suicidal intent (r = -0.46), fearlessness about death (r = -0.29), and unmet interpersonal needs (r = -0.28), while Risk was only correlated with suicidal intent (r = 0.29). In a hierarchical regression model, Rescue was the strongest predictor of suicidal intent.

Conclusion: Rescue factors, more than medical severity factors, were consistently related to our measures of suicidal mental state. Including the rescue component in lethality assessments may improve both the accuracy of clinical evaluations and our understanding of adolescents' mental state during suicidal crisis.

评估自杀企图的致命性:在医疗严重程度上增加获救的机会。
在评估自杀企图的致命性时,强调医学严重性可能会忽略重要的环境因素。我们检验区分医疗严重程度和抢救机会是否能提高对自杀心理状态的评估和理解。方法:采用自杀意图量表对70例近期自杀未遂的青少年住院患者进行访谈,临床医生对风险-抢救评定量表进行评分,该量表对医疗严重程度(Risk)和抢救机会(rescue)分别进行评分。同时完成人际需求问卷和死亡恐惧量表。结果:致死成分Risk与Rescue不相关(r = -0.02)。然而,Rescue与自杀意图(r = -0.46)、对死亡的恐惧(r = -0.29)和未满足的人际需求(r = -0.28)呈显著负相关,而Risk仅与自杀意图相关(r = 0.29)。在层次回归模型中,救援是自杀意图的最强预测因子。结论:抢救因素与自杀心理状态的关系大于医学严重性因素。在致死性评估中加入救援成分,既可以提高临床评估的准确性,也可以提高我们对自杀危机中青少年心理状态的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: An excellent resource for researchers as well as students, Social Cognition features reports on empirical research, self-perception, self-concept, social neuroscience, person-memory integration, social schemata, the development of social cognition, and the role of affect in memory and perception. Three broad concerns define the scope of the journal: - The processes underlying the perception, memory, and judgment of social stimuli - The effects of social, cultural, and affective factors on the processing of information - The behavioral and interpersonal consequences of cognitive processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信