PROTOCOL: The Impact of Relocation Processes on Populations Facing Socio-Territorial Inequities: A Scoping Review Protocol: A Systematic Review

IF 3.8 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Pascale Chagnon, Audate Pierre-Paul, Geneviève Cloutier, Marianne Demers-Desmarais
{"title":"PROTOCOL: The Impact of Relocation Processes on Populations Facing Socio-Territorial Inequities: A Scoping Review Protocol: A Systematic Review","authors":"Pascale Chagnon,&nbsp;Audate Pierre-Paul,&nbsp;Geneviève Cloutier,&nbsp;Marianne Demers-Desmarais","doi":"10.1002/cl2.70072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n <p>Relocation processes are increasingly considered local adaptations to flooding. While relocation can offer many benefits, it also leads to socio-economic and socio-psychological consequences. Moreover, it tends to place greater pressure on populations experiencing socio-territorial inequities compared to other households. It is therefore important to assess the direct and indirect impacts of relocation to consider its application from a more just and equitable perspective. The objective of this scoping review is to document the impacts of flood-induced residential relocation processes on populations facing socio-territorial inequities in North America and Europe. It also seeks to categorize the challenges faced by planners in relocation processes. This will help us better assess the relevance of relocation as an adaptation measure to climate change for populations facing socio-territorial inequities. This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the methodological guide <i>JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis</i> (Aromataris and Munn 2020). A systematic search will first be developed in collaboration with an expert librarian. Five databases will be searched: Erudit, Cairn, Web of Science, GreenFILE (EBSCO), and GeoBase (Engineering Village). Gray literature will be collected from Policy Commons, Open Access Theses and Dissertations, Google Scholar, Google, and relevant governmental websites. A screening of the studies and documents obtained will then be carried out by two independent reviewers to retain the relevant documents for the scoping review. If needed, the involvement of a third reviewer will be solicited. The data relevant to our question will then be extracted, using a tool created by the authors, and then analyzed and presented in narrative and tabular formats. The results of this scoping review will be used to discuss and share insights and lessons learned. It will allow us to draw conclusions on the impacts of residential relocation processes on populations facing socio-territorial inequities and to identify best practices for land-use planning in the context of climate change.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"21 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12516908/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cl2.70072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relocation processes are increasingly considered local adaptations to flooding. While relocation can offer many benefits, it also leads to socio-economic and socio-psychological consequences. Moreover, it tends to place greater pressure on populations experiencing socio-territorial inequities compared to other households. It is therefore important to assess the direct and indirect impacts of relocation to consider its application from a more just and equitable perspective. The objective of this scoping review is to document the impacts of flood-induced residential relocation processes on populations facing socio-territorial inequities in North America and Europe. It also seeks to categorize the challenges faced by planners in relocation processes. This will help us better assess the relevance of relocation as an adaptation measure to climate change for populations facing socio-territorial inequities. This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the methodological guide JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (Aromataris and Munn 2020). A systematic search will first be developed in collaboration with an expert librarian. Five databases will be searched: Erudit, Cairn, Web of Science, GreenFILE (EBSCO), and GeoBase (Engineering Village). Gray literature will be collected from Policy Commons, Open Access Theses and Dissertations, Google Scholar, Google, and relevant governmental websites. A screening of the studies and documents obtained will then be carried out by two independent reviewers to retain the relevant documents for the scoping review. If needed, the involvement of a third reviewer will be solicited. The data relevant to our question will then be extracted, using a tool created by the authors, and then analyzed and presented in narrative and tabular formats. The results of this scoping review will be used to discuss and share insights and lessons learned. It will allow us to draw conclusions on the impacts of residential relocation processes on populations facing socio-territorial inequities and to identify best practices for land-use planning in the context of climate change.

议定书:重新安置过程对面临社会-领土不平等的人口的影响:范围审查议定书:系统审查。
重新安置过程越来越多地被认为是当地对洪水的适应。虽然搬迁可以带来许多好处,但它也会导致社会经济和社会心理后果。此外,与其他家庭相比,它往往对经历社会-领土不平等的人口施加更大的压力。因此,重要的是评估搬迁的直接和间接影响,以便从更公正和公平的角度考虑其适用。本次范围审查的目的是记录洪水引起的居住重新安置过程对北美和欧洲面临社会领土不平等的人口的影响。它还设法对规划人员在搬迁过程中所面临的挑战进行分类。这将有助于我们更好地评估搬迁作为一种适应气候变化措施对面临社会-领土不平等的人口的相关性。本次范围审查将按照JBI证据合成手册(Aromataris and Munn 2020)的方法学指南进行。一个系统的搜索将首先与一位专家图书馆员合作开发。五个数据库将被检索:Erudit, Cairn, Web of Science, GreenFILE (EBSCO)和GeoBase (Engineering Village)。灰色文献将从政策共享、开放存取论文、谷歌学者、谷歌和相关政府网站收集。然后将由两名独立审稿人对获得的研究和文件进行筛选,以保留相关文件用于范围审查。如有需要,将征求第三方审稿人的参与。然后将使用作者创建的工具提取与我们问题相关的数据,然后分析并以叙述和表格格式呈现。此范围审查的结果将用于讨论和分享见解和经验教训。它将使我们能够得出关于住宅搬迁过程对面临社会领土不平等的人口的影响的结论,并确定气候变化背景下土地使用规划的最佳做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Campbell Systematic Reviews
Campbell Systematic Reviews Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书