Wealth, health expenditure and cancer: an econometric analysis for European countries.

IF 3.3 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Bayram Aydın, Emine İlkin Aydın
{"title":"Wealth, health expenditure and cancer: an econometric analysis for European countries.","authors":"Bayram Aydın, Emine İlkin Aydın","doi":"10.1186/s13561-025-00665-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The main purpose of this study is to examine the effects of health expenditures and wealth on cancer treatment success in European countries. Cervical cancer data were used for this purpose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cervical cancer incidence/death rate (CANCER), Gross Domestic Product per capita (GDPP) and Current health expenditure (HEXP) were included as predictors. Cancer data was obtained from WHO European Data Warehouse while health expenditure and wealth datas were obtained from World Bank Development Indicators. Panel regression models, panel ARDL cointegration analysis and Dumitrescu-Hurlin causality analysis were used to define the existence of a statistical relationship between variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The result obtained in the model shows the existence of a positive relationship between cervical cancer and all independent variables (health expenditures and wealth). While cervical cancer treatment success in the European countries is highly sensitive to health expenditure, the effect of wealth on cervical cancer is very weak. According to the findings of the causality analysis, a unidirectional causal relationship from HEXP to CANCER and a unidirectional causal relationship from GDPP to CANCER was determined in analysis. So, independent variables in the model are the cause of cervical cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides important evidence for policy makers to allocate relevant and economic resources to healthcare services to succeed in cervical cancer. The determination that health expenditures have a positive effect on the treatment of cervical cancer provides a clue that more efforts should be made regarding the economic accessibility of health services in european countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"82"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12522437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00665-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The main purpose of this study is to examine the effects of health expenditures and wealth on cancer treatment success in European countries. Cervical cancer data were used for this purpose.

Methods: Cervical cancer incidence/death rate (CANCER), Gross Domestic Product per capita (GDPP) and Current health expenditure (HEXP) were included as predictors. Cancer data was obtained from WHO European Data Warehouse while health expenditure and wealth datas were obtained from World Bank Development Indicators. Panel regression models, panel ARDL cointegration analysis and Dumitrescu-Hurlin causality analysis were used to define the existence of a statistical relationship between variables.

Results: The result obtained in the model shows the existence of a positive relationship between cervical cancer and all independent variables (health expenditures and wealth). While cervical cancer treatment success in the European countries is highly sensitive to health expenditure, the effect of wealth on cervical cancer is very weak. According to the findings of the causality analysis, a unidirectional causal relationship from HEXP to CANCER and a unidirectional causal relationship from GDPP to CANCER was determined in analysis. So, independent variables in the model are the cause of cervical cancer.

Conclusion: This study provides important evidence for policy makers to allocate relevant and economic resources to healthcare services to succeed in cervical cancer. The determination that health expenditures have a positive effect on the treatment of cervical cancer provides a clue that more efforts should be made regarding the economic accessibility of health services in european countries.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

财富、医疗支出和癌症:对欧洲国家的计量经济学分析。
目的:本研究的主要目的是检验欧洲国家卫生支出和财富对癌症治疗成功的影响。子宫颈癌的数据被用于此目的。方法:将宫颈癌发病率/死亡率(cancer)、人均国内生产总值(GDPP)和当前卫生支出(HEXP)作为预测因素。癌症数据来自世卫组织欧洲数据仓库,卫生支出和财富数据来自世界银行发展指标。采用面板回归模型、面板ARDL协整分析和dumitrescui - hurlin因果分析来定义变量之间是否存在统计关系。结果:模型结果显示宫颈癌与所有自变量(卫生支出和财富)之间存在正相关关系。虽然在欧洲国家,宫颈癌治疗的成功与否对保健支出高度敏感,但财富对宫颈癌的影响却非常微弱。根据因果分析结果,在分析中确定了HEXP与CANCER的单向因果关系和GDPP与CANCER的单向因果关系。所以,模型中的自变量是宫颈癌的病因。结论:本研究为决策者合理分配相关资源和经济资源用于宫颈癌的医疗服务提供了重要依据。保健支出对宫颈癌治疗产生积极影响的确定提供了一个线索,即欧洲国家应在保健服务的经济可及性方面作出更多努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
59
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信