A comparison between the delivery of genomic and pharmacogenomic education and training for pharmacy undergraduates between the UK and other international countries: A narrative review

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Sophie Harding , Anne Cleves , Amira Guirguis
{"title":"A comparison between the delivery of genomic and pharmacogenomic education and training for pharmacy undergraduates between the UK and other international countries: A narrative review","authors":"Sophie Harding ,&nbsp;Anne Cleves ,&nbsp;Amira Guirguis","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Genomics is perceived to impact healthcare in the United Kingdom and pharmacy professionals are believed to have a key role in the delivery of pharmacogenomic services.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To compare the delivery of genomic education within pharmacy undergraduate training between the UK and other countries.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Six electronic databases were searched including MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library using variations of the terms pharmacogenomic, genomics and education, looking at all levels of education. No date restrictions were applied. Studies were then screened for duplicates and eligibility for inclusion.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty studies were included and categorised into three main themes: identifying training requirements, training methods, and curriculum design/review. Most studies (<em>n</em> = 30) were from the United States. Many international studies highlighted the need to improve pharmacy undergraduate pharmacogenomic training. The pharmacist pharmacogenomic focussed competencies available in the United States have underpinned the development of pharmacist pharmacogenomic education and many studies described a mixed-methods approach to education delivery to ensure pharmacy student pharmacogenomic competence. The curricula evaluation in the Unites States and Australia demonstrated improved pharmacogenomic content within school of pharmacy curriculums but lacks nationwide standardisation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This review demonstrates global growth in pharmacy pharmacogenomic education, particularly in the US, where competencies and delivery methods have been defined and explored across institutions. The United Kingdom should develop its own competency framework to guide pharmacogenomic education for pharmacy undergraduates. This would support efforts to standardise genomic content in UK pharmacy curricula and promote the creation of standardised tools for effective training across all pharmacy schools.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"18 1","pages":"Article 102481"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129725002023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genomics is perceived to impact healthcare in the United Kingdom and pharmacy professionals are believed to have a key role in the delivery of pharmacogenomic services.

Purpose

To compare the delivery of genomic education within pharmacy undergraduate training between the UK and other countries.

Method

Six electronic databases were searched including MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library using variations of the terms pharmacogenomic, genomics and education, looking at all levels of education. No date restrictions were applied. Studies were then screened for duplicates and eligibility for inclusion.

Results

Fifty studies were included and categorised into three main themes: identifying training requirements, training methods, and curriculum design/review. Most studies (n = 30) were from the United States. Many international studies highlighted the need to improve pharmacy undergraduate pharmacogenomic training. The pharmacist pharmacogenomic focussed competencies available in the United States have underpinned the development of pharmacist pharmacogenomic education and many studies described a mixed-methods approach to education delivery to ensure pharmacy student pharmacogenomic competence. The curricula evaluation in the Unites States and Australia demonstrated improved pharmacogenomic content within school of pharmacy curriculums but lacks nationwide standardisation.

Conclusions

This review demonstrates global growth in pharmacy pharmacogenomic education, particularly in the US, where competencies and delivery methods have been defined and explored across institutions. The United Kingdom should develop its own competency framework to guide pharmacogenomic education for pharmacy undergraduates. This would support efforts to standardise genomic content in UK pharmacy curricula and promote the creation of standardised tools for effective training across all pharmacy schools.
基因组学和药物基因组学教育与培训在英国和其他国际国家的药学本科生之间的比较:一个叙述性的回顾。
基因组学被认为影响着英国的医疗保健,药学专业人员被认为在提供药物基因组学服务方面发挥着关键作用。目的:比较英国和其他国家在药学本科培训中提供基因组教育的情况。方法:检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane Library等6个电子数据库,使用药物基因组学(pharmacogenomic)、基因组学(genomics)和教育(education)三个词的变体进行检索。没有日期限制。然后筛选研究的重复和纳入资格。结果:纳入了50项研究,并将其分为三个主题:确定培训要求、培训方法和课程设计/审查。大多数研究(n = 30)来自美国。许多国际研究强调需要改善药学本科药物基因组学培训。在美国,以药物基因组学为重点的药剂师能力支持了药剂师药物基因组学教育的发展,许多研究描述了一种混合方法的教育方式,以确保药学学生的药物基因组学能力。美国和澳大利亚的课程评估表明,药学院课程中的药物基因组学内容有所改善,但缺乏全国性的标准化。结论:这篇综述展示了全球药学药物基因组学教育的增长,特别是在美国,在那里,能力和交付方法已经在各个机构中得到定义和探索。英国应该制定自己的能力框架来指导药学本科生的药物基因组学教育。这将支持在英国药学课程中标准化基因组内容的努力,并促进所有药学学校有效培训的标准化工具的创建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
192
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书