Comparison of the efficacy and safety of levofloxacin eye drops and pranoprofen gel in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis in the real world.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Chenao Yu, Yixin Mao, Tao Jiang, Jun Ye, Xiaogang Hong, Jianying Dong
{"title":"Comparison of the efficacy and safety of levofloxacin eye drops and pranoprofen gel in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis in the real world.","authors":"Chenao Yu, Yixin Mao, Tao Jiang, Jun Ye, Xiaogang Hong, Jianying Dong","doi":"10.36721/PJPS.2025.38.5.REG.14541.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared the efficacy and safety of levofloxacin eye drops and pranoprofen gel in treating bacterial conjunctivitis via a prospective randomized controlled design. A total of 200 patients with bacterial conjunctivitis were included, randomly divided into two groups (100 cases each) for 14-day corresponding drug treatment. Symptom improvement, bacterial clearance and adverse reactions were observed. Results showed that on treatment days 1 and 3, the levofloxacin group had significantly lower scores in conjunctival congestion (1.9±0.4 vs 2.1±0.5; 1.5±0.3 vs 1.7±0.4) and secretions (2.1±0.5 vs 2.3±0.6; 1.7±0.4 vs 1.9±0.5) than the pranoprofen group (all P<0.05). The bacterial clearance rate of the levofloxacin group was 85% (85/100), significantly higher than the pranoprofen group's 70% (70/100) (χ<sub>²</sub>=5.32, P<0.05). The total effective rate of the levofloxacin group was 90% (90/100), significantly higher than the pranoprofen group's 80% (80/100) (χ<sub>²</sub>=3.92, P<0.05). For safety, the adverse reaction incidence was 15% (15/100) in the levofloxacin group and 13% (13/100) in the pranoprofen group, with no significant difference (χ<sub>²</sub>=0.258, P=0.612). This study indicates levofloxacin eye drops have efficacy advantages and the two are comparable in safety, providing a valuable medication reference for clinical treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19971,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences","volume":"38 5","pages":"1985-1992"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36721/PJPS.2025.38.5.REG.14541.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compared the efficacy and safety of levofloxacin eye drops and pranoprofen gel in treating bacterial conjunctivitis via a prospective randomized controlled design. A total of 200 patients with bacterial conjunctivitis were included, randomly divided into two groups (100 cases each) for 14-day corresponding drug treatment. Symptom improvement, bacterial clearance and adverse reactions were observed. Results showed that on treatment days 1 and 3, the levofloxacin group had significantly lower scores in conjunctival congestion (1.9±0.4 vs 2.1±0.5; 1.5±0.3 vs 1.7±0.4) and secretions (2.1±0.5 vs 2.3±0.6; 1.7±0.4 vs 1.9±0.5) than the pranoprofen group (all P<0.05). The bacterial clearance rate of the levofloxacin group was 85% (85/100), significantly higher than the pranoprofen group's 70% (70/100) (χ²=5.32, P<0.05). The total effective rate of the levofloxacin group was 90% (90/100), significantly higher than the pranoprofen group's 80% (80/100) (χ²=3.92, P<0.05). For safety, the adverse reaction incidence was 15% (15/100) in the levofloxacin group and 13% (13/100) in the pranoprofen group, with no significant difference (χ²=0.258, P=0.612). This study indicates levofloxacin eye drops have efficacy advantages and the two are comparable in safety, providing a valuable medication reference for clinical treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis.

左氧氟沙星滴眼液与普罗洛芬凝胶治疗细菌性结膜炎的临床疗效及安全性比较。
本研究通过前瞻性随机对照设计比较左氧氟沙星滴眼液和普萘洛芬凝胶治疗细菌性结膜炎的疗效和安全性。纳入200例细菌性结膜炎患者,随机分为两组(每组100例),进行14天的相应药物治疗。观察两组患者的症状改善、细菌清除情况及不良反应。结果显示,治疗第1、3天左氧氟沙星组结膜充血评分(1.9±0.4 vs 2.1±0.5;1.5±0.3 vs 1.7±0.4)和分泌物评分(2.1±0.5 vs 2.3±0.6;1.7±0.4 vs 1.9±0.5)均显著低于普萘洛芬组(P²=5.32,P²=3.92,P²=0.258,P=0.612)。本研究提示左氧氟沙星滴眼液具有疗效优势,且两者安全性相当,为临床治疗细菌性结膜炎提供有价值的用药参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
211
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (PJPS) is a peer reviewed multi-disciplinary pharmaceutical sciences journal. The PJPS had its origin in 1988 from the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Karachi as a biannual journal, frequency converted as quarterly in 2005, and now PJPS is being published as bi-monthly from January 2013. PJPS covers Biological, Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Research (Drug Delivery, Pharmacy Management, Molecular Biology, Biochemical, Pharmacology, Pharmacokinetics, Phytochemical, Bio-analytical, Therapeutics, Biotechnology and research on nano particles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信