{"title":"Breakthrough Invasive Mould Infections Under Posaconazole Prophylaxis in Patients With Haematologic Malignancies: A Case-Control Study.","authors":"Camille Marchetti, Emmanouil Glampedakis, Jannik Stemler, Luise Hänsel, Sabine Kuster, Ilona Kronig, Katia Boggian, Nina Khanna, Dionysios Neofytos, Oliver A Cornely, Frederic Lamoth","doi":"10.1111/myc.70123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Posaconazole (POS) prophylaxis is recommended for the prevention of invasive mould infections among patients with haematologic cancer and prolonged neutropenia or following allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation. Albeit rare, breakthrough invasive mould infections (bIMI) are associated with high mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the epidemiology, causes and outcomes of bIMI under POS prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Patients/methods: </strong>Haematologic cancer patients with a diagnosis of proven/probable bIMI while receiving POS prophylaxis for ≥ 7 days were retrospectively included in five hospitals (Switzerland and Germany). For each bIMI case, one to two non-bIMI controls receiving POS prophylaxis for the same haematologic condition were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29 bIMI episodes and 46 controls were included. Baseline characteristics and median POS trough concentrations did not significantly differ between the two groups. Invasive aspergillosis was the most frequent bIMI (52%), followed by invasive mucormycosis (31%). POS non-susceptible pathogens were the causes of bIMI in 14% of cases. While insufficient POS exposure was observed in 39% of bIMI cases, this proportion was similar in the control group. Most bIMI were treated with liposomal amphotericin B first-line therapy and received multiple antifungal therapies. Overall mortality was significantly higher among bIMI compared to controls (52% vs. 20%, p = 0.005). Surgery was the only parameter significantly associated with survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This case-control study shows that bIMI is associated with a significant impact on mortality. Most bIMI were attributed to presumably POS-susceptible pathogens without a clear association with POS underexposure. The causes of bIMI remain unclear and may be the conjunction of multiple parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":18797,"journal":{"name":"Mycoses","volume":"68 10","pages":"e70123"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523195/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mycoses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.70123","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Posaconazole (POS) prophylaxis is recommended for the prevention of invasive mould infections among patients with haematologic cancer and prolonged neutropenia or following allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation. Albeit rare, breakthrough invasive mould infections (bIMI) are associated with high mortality rates.
Objectives: To assess the epidemiology, causes and outcomes of bIMI under POS prophylaxis.
Patients/methods: Haematologic cancer patients with a diagnosis of proven/probable bIMI while receiving POS prophylaxis for ≥ 7 days were retrospectively included in five hospitals (Switzerland and Germany). For each bIMI case, one to two non-bIMI controls receiving POS prophylaxis for the same haematologic condition were included.
Results: A total of 29 bIMI episodes and 46 controls were included. Baseline characteristics and median POS trough concentrations did not significantly differ between the two groups. Invasive aspergillosis was the most frequent bIMI (52%), followed by invasive mucormycosis (31%). POS non-susceptible pathogens were the causes of bIMI in 14% of cases. While insufficient POS exposure was observed in 39% of bIMI cases, this proportion was similar in the control group. Most bIMI were treated with liposomal amphotericin B first-line therapy and received multiple antifungal therapies. Overall mortality was significantly higher among bIMI compared to controls (52% vs. 20%, p = 0.005). Surgery was the only parameter significantly associated with survival.
Conclusions: This case-control study shows that bIMI is associated with a significant impact on mortality. Most bIMI were attributed to presumably POS-susceptible pathogens without a clear association with POS underexposure. The causes of bIMI remain unclear and may be the conjunction of multiple parameters.
背景:泊沙康唑(Posaconazole, POS)被推荐用于预防血液学癌症患者和长期中性粒细胞减少或异体造血细胞移植后的侵袭性霉菌感染。尽管罕见,但突破性侵袭性霉菌感染(bIMI)与高死亡率相关。目的:探讨POS预防下的bIMI流行病学、原因及预后。患者/方法:回顾性纳入5家医院(瑞士和德国)接受POS预防治疗≥7天且诊断为证实/可能为bIMI的血液学癌症患者。对于每个bIMI病例,包括一至两名因相同血液学状况接受POS预防的非bIMI对照。结果:共纳入29例bIMI发作和46例对照。基线特征和中位POS波谷浓度在两组之间无显著差异。侵袭性曲霉病是最常见的bIMI(52%),其次是侵袭性毛霉病(31%)。14%的病例中,POS非易感病原体是导致bIMI的原因。在39%的bIMI病例中观察到POS暴露不足,这一比例在对照组中相似。大多数bIMI患者接受两性霉素B脂质体一线治疗,并接受多种抗真菌治疗。与对照组相比,bIMI组的总死亡率明显更高(52% vs. 20%, p = 0.005)。手术是唯一与生存显著相关的参数。结论:本病例对照研究表明,bIMI对死亡率有显著影响。大多数bIMI可能归因于POS易感病原体,而与POS暴露不足没有明确的关联。bIMI的病因尚不清楚,可能是多种因素共同作用的结果。
期刊介绍:
The journal Mycoses provides an international forum for original papers in English on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapy, prophylaxis, and epidemiology of fungal infectious diseases in humans as well as on the biology of pathogenic fungi.
Medical mycology as part of medical microbiology is advancing rapidly. Effective therapeutic strategies are already available in chemotherapy and are being further developed. Their application requires reliable laboratory diagnostic techniques, which, in turn, result from mycological basic research. Opportunistic mycoses vary greatly in their clinical and pathological symptoms, because the underlying disease of a patient at risk decisively determines their symptomatology and progress. The journal Mycoses is therefore of interest to scientists in fundamental mycological research, mycological laboratory diagnosticians and clinicians interested in fungal infections.