Linking vertical ground reaction force loading rates and physical activity levels in individuals with and without patellofemoral pain.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Sungwan Kim, Yannis Halkiadakis, Noah Davidson, Kristin D Morgan, Neal R Glaviano
{"title":"Linking vertical ground reaction force loading rates and physical activity levels in individuals with and without patellofemoral pain.","authors":"Sungwan Kim, Yannis Halkiadakis, Noah Davidson, Kristin D Morgan, Neal R Glaviano","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals with patellofemoral pain (PFP) may walk with higher vertical ground reaction force loading rates (vGRF-LR) compared to pain-free controls, which could relate to modified physical activity behaviors. However, their relationships have not been studied in the PFP literature. This study aimed to explore the association between walking vGRF-LR and physical activity levels in individuals with PFP and pain-free controls and to compare vGRF-LR between groups. Twenty participants (10 with PFP and 10 pain-free) participated in this cross-sectional study. Participants wore a triaxial accelerometer for seven consecutive days to measure physical activity levels (daily steps and time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [MVPA]). Participants also completed a biomechanical assessment while walking at 1.25 m/s on a force plate-embedded treadmill. vGRF-LR were calculated as the average loading rate of 20-80 % and at 60 % of the stance phase. t vGRF-LR were not associated with daily steps and time spent in MVPA in either the PFP (0.15 ≤ r ≤ 0.26; p > 0.05) or pain-free (-0.37 ≤ r ≤ -0.08; p > 0.05) group. However, individuals with PFP walked with higher vGRF-LR averaged between 20-80 % of the stance phase (p = 0.037; d = 1.04) and peak vGRF-LR at 60 % of the stance phase (p = 0.042; d = 1.02) compared to pain-free controls. Our findings suggest that walking loading rates are not associated with physical activity levels in either group, despite higher loading rates in PFP cohorts. Given the lack of associations between these variables, future studies should examine other potential factors that may enhance our understanding of loading rates or physical activity in individuals with or without PFP.</p>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"193 ","pages":"112977"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112977","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individuals with patellofemoral pain (PFP) may walk with higher vertical ground reaction force loading rates (vGRF-LR) compared to pain-free controls, which could relate to modified physical activity behaviors. However, their relationships have not been studied in the PFP literature. This study aimed to explore the association between walking vGRF-LR and physical activity levels in individuals with PFP and pain-free controls and to compare vGRF-LR between groups. Twenty participants (10 with PFP and 10 pain-free) participated in this cross-sectional study. Participants wore a triaxial accelerometer for seven consecutive days to measure physical activity levels (daily steps and time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [MVPA]). Participants also completed a biomechanical assessment while walking at 1.25 m/s on a force plate-embedded treadmill. vGRF-LR were calculated as the average loading rate of 20-80 % and at 60 % of the stance phase. t vGRF-LR were not associated with daily steps and time spent in MVPA in either the PFP (0.15 ≤ r ≤ 0.26; p > 0.05) or pain-free (-0.37 ≤ r ≤ -0.08; p > 0.05) group. However, individuals with PFP walked with higher vGRF-LR averaged between 20-80 % of the stance phase (p = 0.037; d = 1.04) and peak vGRF-LR at 60 % of the stance phase (p = 0.042; d = 1.02) compared to pain-free controls. Our findings suggest that walking loading rates are not associated with physical activity levels in either group, despite higher loading rates in PFP cohorts. Given the lack of associations between these variables, future studies should examine other potential factors that may enhance our understanding of loading rates or physical activity in individuals with or without PFP.

链接垂直地面反力负荷率和身体活动水平的个体有和没有髌股疼痛。
与无痛对照相比,髌骨股痛(PFP)患者行走时的垂直地面反力负荷率(vGRF-LR)可能更高,这可能与身体活动行为的改变有关。然而,它们之间的关系尚未在PFP文献中得到研究。本研究旨在探讨PFP患者和无痛对照者步行vGRF-LR与身体活动水平之间的关系,并比较各组之间的vGRF-LR。20名参与者(10名PFP患者和10名无痛患者)参加了这项横断面研究。参与者连续7天佩戴三轴加速度计来测量身体活动水平(每日步数和中等到剧烈身体活动的时间[MVPA])。参与者还在嵌入力板的跑步机上以1.25米/秒的速度行走时完成了生物力学评估。vGRF-LR计算为20- 80%的平均加载率和60%的立场阶段。在PFP组(0.15≤r≤0.26;p > 0.05)和无痛组(-0.37≤r≤-0.08;p > 0.05)中,vGRF-LR与每日步数和MVPA时间无关。然而,与无痛对照组相比,PFP患者行走时vGRF-LR平均在站立期的20- 80%之间(p = 0.037; d = 1.04), vGRF-LR峰值在站立期的60% (p = 0.042; d = 1.02)。我们的研究结果表明,尽管PFP组的步行负荷率更高,但两组的步行负荷率与身体活动水平无关。鉴于这些变量之间缺乏关联,未来的研究应该检查其他潜在因素,以提高我们对有或没有PFP的个体的负荷率或身体活动的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信