Quantification of plasma APOE4 with a novel automated Lumipulse immunoassay enables the identification of homozygous and heterozygous APOE ε4 carrier status
G. Musso , C. Cosma , S. Moz , C. Gabelli , F. Navaglia , A. Codemo , C.F. Zambon , A. Cagnin , A. Antonini , M. Corbetta , M. Montagnana
{"title":"Quantification of plasma APOE4 with a novel automated Lumipulse immunoassay enables the identification of homozygous and heterozygous APOE ε4 carrier status","authors":"G. Musso , C. Cosma , S. Moz , C. Gabelli , F. Navaglia , A. Codemo , C.F. Zambon , A. Cagnin , A. Antonini , M. Corbetta , M. Montagnana","doi":"10.1016/j.cca.2025.120659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele is a significant risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD). While genetic testing remains the gold standard for determining <em>APOE</em> status, protein-level quantification could offer advantages in clinical practice. This study evaluates a novel, fully automated immunoassay for quantifying APOE4 and total APOE (Pan-APOE) in plasma samples, assessing its accuracy and clinical utility compared to traditional genetic testing.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Plasma samples from 65 patients (39 ε4 non-carriers, 21 ε4 heterozygous, 5 ε4 homozygous) were analyzed using the Lumipulse 1200 G APOE4 & Pan-APOE immunoassays. The APOE4/Pan-APOE ratio (Ratio%) was calculated to determine ε4 carrier status. Results were compared to genetic testing. Assay repeatability was evaluated using triplicate measurements from three patients with different genotypes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>APOE4 and Pan-APOE protein levels and Ratio% differed significantly across ε4 status groups (<em>p</em> < 0.0001). The Ratio% showed no overlap between groups. ROC curve analysis for ε4 carrier identification showed an AUC of 1.00, with 100 % sensitivity and specificity at a 14 % cut-off. Perfect agreement was observed between the immunoassay and genetic testing (Cohen's kappa = 1.00, <em>p</em> < 0.0001). Intra-assay CV was <5 % for APOE4 and <8 % for Ratio%.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This novel immunoassay demonstrates excellent and potential for faster results could offer advantages in clinical practice, particularly for AD therapy eligibility evaluation. However, further validation in larger, diverse cohorts is necessary before considering widespread clinical implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10205,"journal":{"name":"Clinica Chimica Acta","volume":"579 ","pages":"Article 120659"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica Chimica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009898125005388","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele is a significant risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD). While genetic testing remains the gold standard for determining APOE status, protein-level quantification could offer advantages in clinical practice. This study evaluates a novel, fully automated immunoassay for quantifying APOE4 and total APOE (Pan-APOE) in plasma samples, assessing its accuracy and clinical utility compared to traditional genetic testing.
Materials and methods
Plasma samples from 65 patients (39 ε4 non-carriers, 21 ε4 heterozygous, 5 ε4 homozygous) were analyzed using the Lumipulse 1200 G APOE4 & Pan-APOE immunoassays. The APOE4/Pan-APOE ratio (Ratio%) was calculated to determine ε4 carrier status. Results were compared to genetic testing. Assay repeatability was evaluated using triplicate measurements from three patients with different genotypes.
Results
APOE4 and Pan-APOE protein levels and Ratio% differed significantly across ε4 status groups (p < 0.0001). The Ratio% showed no overlap between groups. ROC curve analysis for ε4 carrier identification showed an AUC of 1.00, with 100 % sensitivity and specificity at a 14 % cut-off. Perfect agreement was observed between the immunoassay and genetic testing (Cohen's kappa = 1.00, p < 0.0001). Intra-assay CV was <5 % for APOE4 and <8 % for Ratio%.
Discussion
This novel immunoassay demonstrates excellent and potential for faster results could offer advantages in clinical practice, particularly for AD therapy eligibility evaluation. However, further validation in larger, diverse cohorts is necessary before considering widespread clinical implementation.
期刊介绍:
The Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC)
Clinica Chimica Acta is a high-quality journal which publishes original Research Communications in the field of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, defined as the diagnostic application of chemistry, biochemistry, immunochemistry, biochemical aspects of hematology, toxicology, and molecular biology to the study of human disease in body fluids and cells.
The objective of the journal is to publish novel information leading to a better understanding of biological mechanisms of human diseases, their prevention, diagnosis, and patient management. Reports of an applied clinical character are also welcome. Papers concerned with normal metabolic processes or with constituents of normal cells or body fluids, such as reports of experimental or clinical studies in animals, are only considered when they are clearly and directly relevant to human disease. Evaluation of commercial products have a low priority for publication, unless they are novel or represent a technological breakthrough. Studies dealing with effects of drugs and natural products and studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not within the journal''s scope. Development and evaluation of novel analytical methodologies where applicable to diagnostic clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, including point-of-care testing, and topics on laboratory management and informatics will also be considered. Studies focused on emerging diagnostic technologies and (big) data analysis procedures including digitalization, mobile Health, and artificial Intelligence applied to Laboratory Medicine are also of interest.