Radiographic evaluation of key anatomical markers in discoid lateral meniscus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Xixin Jin, Xujin Wu, Yongtao Mao, Zelong Yang, Haoyu Wang
{"title":"Radiographic evaluation of key anatomical markers in discoid lateral meniscus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Xixin Jin, Xujin Wu, Yongtao Mao, Zelong Yang, Haoyu Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-09175-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The lateral discoid meniscus (DLM), a common anatomical variant in Asian populations, is often linked to knee pain, restricted motion, and an increased risk of meniscal tears. Due to limitations of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in certain patients, this study aims to assess the efficacy of X-ray parameters in diagnosing DLM, focusing on key features: lateral tibial spine height (LTSH), lateral joint space distance (LJSD), fibular head height (FHH), lateral tibial plateau obliquity (LTPO), and the condylar cut-off sign.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using studies from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (January 2004 - October 2024). Studies with observational designs, X-ray measurements, and data on DLM were included. Mean difference (MD) and 95% CI analyses were performed using Review Manager and Stata.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies involving 788 discoid menisci and 761 normal knees were included. LJSD and FHH were significantly larger in the DLM group (MD = 1.18 and - 3.03, P < 0.01), while LTPO was smaller (MD = -2.18, P < 0.01). LTSH did not show significant differences in children but was smaller in adults with DLM (MD = -0.65, P < 0.01). The condylar cut-off sign also showed significant correlation in both adults and children (MD = -0.10, P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis identifies LJSD, FHH, LTPO, and the condylar cut-off sign as key radiographic markers for diagnosing DLM, with accuracy enhanced when combined, particularly in the absence of MRI. LTSH appears diagnostically relevant mainly in adults, with limited value in pediatric populations.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"958"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523112/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-09175-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The lateral discoid meniscus (DLM), a common anatomical variant in Asian populations, is often linked to knee pain, restricted motion, and an increased risk of meniscal tears. Due to limitations of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in certain patients, this study aims to assess the efficacy of X-ray parameters in diagnosing DLM, focusing on key features: lateral tibial spine height (LTSH), lateral joint space distance (LJSD), fibular head height (FHH), lateral tibial plateau obliquity (LTPO), and the condylar cut-off sign.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using studies from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (January 2004 - October 2024). Studies with observational designs, X-ray measurements, and data on DLM were included. Mean difference (MD) and 95% CI analyses were performed using Review Manager and Stata.

Results: Nine studies involving 788 discoid menisci and 761 normal knees were included. LJSD and FHH were significantly larger in the DLM group (MD = 1.18 and - 3.03, P < 0.01), while LTPO was smaller (MD = -2.18, P < 0.01). LTSH did not show significant differences in children but was smaller in adults with DLM (MD = -0.65, P < 0.01). The condylar cut-off sign also showed significant correlation in both adults and children (MD = -0.10, P < 0.01).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis identifies LJSD, FHH, LTPO, and the condylar cut-off sign as key radiographic markers for diagnosing DLM, with accuracy enhanced when combined, particularly in the absence of MRI. LTSH appears diagnostically relevant mainly in adults, with limited value in pediatric populations.

Level of evidence: IV.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

盘状外侧半月板关键解剖标志的影像学评价:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:外侧盘状半月板(DLM)是亚洲人群中一种常见的解剖变异,常与膝关节疼痛、运动受限和半月板撕裂风险增加有关。由于部分患者磁共振成像(MRI)的局限性,本研究旨在评估x线参数对DLM诊断的有效性,重点关注关键特征:胫骨外侧脊柱高度(LTSH)、外侧关节间隙距离(LJSD)、腓骨头高度(FHH)、胫骨外侧平台倾角(LTPO)和髁截断征象。方法:对PubMed、Embase和Web of Science(2004年1月- 2024年10月)的研究进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。包括观察设计、x射线测量和DLM数据的研究。使用Review Manager和Stata进行平均差异(MD)和95% CI分析。结果:纳入9项研究,涉及788例盘状半月板和761例正常膝关节。LJSD和FHH在DLM组中明显更大(MD = 1.18和- 3.03,P)。结论:本meta分析确定LJSD、FHH、LTPO和髁突切断征是诊断DLM的关键影像学指标,结合使用时准确性提高,特别是在没有MRI的情况下。LTSH主要与成人诊断相关,在儿科人群中的价值有限。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信