Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a new arthrometer for measuring anterior tibial translation in healthy subjects.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Junqiao Li, Jiayao Zhang, Weiting Li, Xiaolong Yang, Mingke You, Zeyu Liu, Wenjing Ma, Qi Li, Yan Xiong, Jian Li
{"title":"Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a new arthrometer for measuring anterior tibial translation in healthy subjects.","authors":"Junqiao Li, Jiayao Zhang, Weiting Li, Xiaolong Yang, Mingke You, Zeyu Liu, Wenjing Ma, Qi Li, Yan Xiong, Jian Li","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-09209-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As a recently available arthrometer, the Ligs arthrometer has been gradually used in clinical practice to assess knee stability. However, its reliability has not been fully established in this regard. The aim of this study was to assess the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the Ligs arthrometer for measuring anterior tibial translation (ATT) and the corresponding side-to-side difference (SSD) in healthy subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 40 healthy male subjects were recruited for this study between June 2023 and September 2023. Three examiners with different levels of experience tested the subjects with the Ligs arthrometer for ATT and SSD measurements. ATT values for both knees and the corresponding SSD at 90 N, 120 N, and 150 N were recorded for analysis. Statistical significance was determined using Student's t test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the Ligs arthrometer for ATT and SSD measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No subject asked to stop any test due to pain or discomfort. There was no significant difference among the three examiners in ATT measurements of the subjects' ipsilateral knees and SSD measurements at the same load (P > 0.05 for all). Furthermore, ATT measurements for the subjects' left and right knees measured by the same examiner were comparable (P > 0.05 for all). The Ligs arthrometer showed excellent intra-rater reliability (ICCs = 0.930-0.982) for ATT measurements and moderate to good intra-rater reliability (ICCs = 0.705-0.862) for SSD measurements. Similarly, its inter-rater reliability was excellent (ICCs = 0.911-0.930) for ATT measurements, but moderate (ICCs = 0.684-0.737) for SSD measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Ligs arthrometer had moderate to excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability for ATT and SSD measurements in healthy knees. As compared with ATT measurements, SSD measurements showed lower intra-rater and inter-rater reliability at the same load. It is recommended that the tests be performed by the same examiner when using the Ligs arthrometer for SSD measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"960"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12522819/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-09209-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As a recently available arthrometer, the Ligs arthrometer has been gradually used in clinical practice to assess knee stability. However, its reliability has not been fully established in this regard. The aim of this study was to assess the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the Ligs arthrometer for measuring anterior tibial translation (ATT) and the corresponding side-to-side difference (SSD) in healthy subjects.

Methods: A total of 40 healthy male subjects were recruited for this study between June 2023 and September 2023. Three examiners with different levels of experience tested the subjects with the Ligs arthrometer for ATT and SSD measurements. ATT values for both knees and the corresponding SSD at 90 N, 120 N, and 150 N were recorded for analysis. Statistical significance was determined using Student's t test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the Ligs arthrometer for ATT and SSD measurements.

Results: No subject asked to stop any test due to pain or discomfort. There was no significant difference among the three examiners in ATT measurements of the subjects' ipsilateral knees and SSD measurements at the same load (P > 0.05 for all). Furthermore, ATT measurements for the subjects' left and right knees measured by the same examiner were comparable (P > 0.05 for all). The Ligs arthrometer showed excellent intra-rater reliability (ICCs = 0.930-0.982) for ATT measurements and moderate to good intra-rater reliability (ICCs = 0.705-0.862) for SSD measurements. Similarly, its inter-rater reliability was excellent (ICCs = 0.911-0.930) for ATT measurements, but moderate (ICCs = 0.684-0.737) for SSD measurements.

Conclusion: The Ligs arthrometer had moderate to excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability for ATT and SSD measurements in healthy knees. As compared with ATT measurements, SSD measurements showed lower intra-rater and inter-rater reliability at the same load. It is recommended that the tests be performed by the same examiner when using the Ligs arthrometer for SSD measurements.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一种测量健康受试者胫骨前平移的新型关节计的内、间可靠性。
背景:作为一种最近可用的关节计,Ligs关节计已逐渐在临床实践中用于评估膝关节稳定性。但是,它在这方面的可靠性尚未得到充分证实。本研究的目的是评估Ligs关节计在健康受试者中测量胫骨前平移(ATT)和相应的侧侧向差(SSD)的内部和内部可靠性。方法:于2023年6月至2023年9月共招募40名健康男性受试者。三名具有不同经验水平的审核员用利吉斯关节计对受试者进行ATT和SSD测量。记录90 N、120 N和150 N时双膝及相应SSD的ATT值进行分析。采用学生t检验或单因素方差分析(ANOVA)确定统计学显著性。使用类内相关系数(ICC)来评估Ligs关节计测量ATT和SSD的组内和组间可靠性。结果:没有受试者因疼痛或不适而要求停止任何测试。在相同负荷下,三名检查者的同侧膝关节ATT测量值和SSD测量值差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。此外,同一检查者测量的受试者左膝和右膝的ATT测量值具有可比性(P < 0.05)。Ligs关节计在ATT测量中表现出优异的内部信度(ICCs = 0.930-0.982),在SSD测量中表现出中等至良好的内部信度(ICCs = 0.705-0.862)。同样,它的评估间信度对于ATT测量是优秀的(ICCs = 0.911-0.930),但是对于SSD测量是中等的(ICCs = 0.684-0.737)。结论:Ligs关节计对健康膝关节的ATT和SSD测量具有中等至优异的内、间可靠性。与ATT测量值相比,SSD测量值在相同负载下显示出较低的内部和内部可靠性。建议在使用Ligs关节计进行SSD测量时,由同一检查人员进行测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信