{"title":"Evaluation of portable, low-cost techniques for discriminating the DFD (dark, firm, dry) condition in beef","authors":"Leonardo Hernández-Hernández , Liliana Mahecha-Ledesma , Joaquín Angulo-Arizala , Wilson Barragán-Hernández","doi":"10.1016/j.meatsci.2025.109971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluated the effectiveness of portable, low-cost techniques, specifically colorimetry and visible spectroscopy for discriminating dark, firm, and dry (DFD) beef carcasses during processing in a certified slaughterhouse. Portable, low-cost devices were used for real-time assessments. A total of 523 chilled carcasses were analyzed, of which 449 were classified as normal and 74 as DFD, based on pH measurements (≥5.8 for DFD). Colorimetric variables <em>(L*</em>, <em>a*</em>, <em>b*</em>, chroma, and hue) were consistently higher in normal carcasses compared to DFD. Supervised classification models were used to predict DFD status using the evaluated detection techniques. Given the class imbalance, the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) was applied, significantly improving the performance of machine learning models. Portable spectroscopy showed superior performance, especially when combined with preprocessing techniques such as multiplicative scatter correction and second-order derivatives, achieving 96.77 % sensitivity and 98.06 % specificity with the Random Forest model. Although colorimetry proved effective, spectroscopy yielded greater reliability for real-time DFD detection. These findings highlight the potential of these techniques as cost-effective alternatives to traditional methods, supporting their applicability in rapid and objective meat quality assessments under industrial conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":389,"journal":{"name":"Meat Science","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 109971"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meat Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0309174025002323","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study evaluated the effectiveness of portable, low-cost techniques, specifically colorimetry and visible spectroscopy for discriminating dark, firm, and dry (DFD) beef carcasses during processing in a certified slaughterhouse. Portable, low-cost devices were used for real-time assessments. A total of 523 chilled carcasses were analyzed, of which 449 were classified as normal and 74 as DFD, based on pH measurements (≥5.8 for DFD). Colorimetric variables (L*, a*, b*, chroma, and hue) were consistently higher in normal carcasses compared to DFD. Supervised classification models were used to predict DFD status using the evaluated detection techniques. Given the class imbalance, the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) was applied, significantly improving the performance of machine learning models. Portable spectroscopy showed superior performance, especially when combined with preprocessing techniques such as multiplicative scatter correction and second-order derivatives, achieving 96.77 % sensitivity and 98.06 % specificity with the Random Forest model. Although colorimetry proved effective, spectroscopy yielded greater reliability for real-time DFD detection. These findings highlight the potential of these techniques as cost-effective alternatives to traditional methods, supporting their applicability in rapid and objective meat quality assessments under industrial conditions.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Meat Science is to serve as a suitable platform for the dissemination of interdisciplinary and international knowledge on all factors influencing the properties of meat. While the journal primarily focuses on the flesh of mammals, contributions related to poultry will be considered if they enhance the overall understanding of the relationship between muscle nature and meat quality post mortem. Additionally, papers on large birds (e.g., emus, ostriches) as well as wild-captured mammals and crocodiles will be welcomed.