A Systematic Review of Parenting Programs for Southeast Asian Families.

IF 6.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Sun-Kyung Lee,Qiyue Cai,Vijaya M Nandiwada-Hofer,Tiffany Tran,Kyong Ah Kim,Joanna J Kim
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Parenting Programs for Southeast Asian Families.","authors":"Sun-Kyung Lee,Qiyue Cai,Vijaya M Nandiwada-Hofer,Tiffany Tran,Kyong Ah Kim,Joanna J Kim","doi":"10.1007/s10567-025-00546-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence-based parenting interventions are proven to prevent problematic substance use and mental health problems by promoting parent-child communication, positive parenting, and parental self-efficacy. However, the effectiveness of parenting interventions for Southeast Asian (SEA) families from low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) is understudied. This review aimed to identify parenting programs available for the SEA population and synthesize the evidence of efficacy.\r\n\r\nMETHOD\r\nThe study was conducted in accordance with synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) guidelines. The study utilized five databases to conduct a comprehensive literature search and yielded 2,270 initial records.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThirty-nine intervention studies from 41 peer-reviewed articles met eligibility, including 29 in-region studies (i.e., intervention delivery within SEA, e.g., Thailand, Vietnam) and ten diaspora studies (i.e., interventions delivered to SEA families outside SEA LMICs, e.g., the United States). Out of 31 distinct programs, 13 programs were adapted from prior interventions, 13 were newly developed, and 5 were previously developed for SEA-heritage families. Most studies (n = 34) reported adaptations, with variation found between in-region and diaspora studies. Programs addressed multiple child and family outcomes. Across all studies, preliminary evidence supported effectiveness in enhancing positive parenting, reducing negative parenting, and improving child behavior.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nOverall, the current review provides support that parenting programs promote child and family well-being among SEA families. It also highlights the need to conduct rigorous research with active controls and well-established measures, document adaptation processes clearly for future implementation, and the potential for public health impact in multiple domains through new and adapted parenting programs for SEA families.","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-025-00546-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence-based parenting interventions are proven to prevent problematic substance use and mental health problems by promoting parent-child communication, positive parenting, and parental self-efficacy. However, the effectiveness of parenting interventions for Southeast Asian (SEA) families from low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) is understudied. This review aimed to identify parenting programs available for the SEA population and synthesize the evidence of efficacy. METHOD The study was conducted in accordance with synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) guidelines. The study utilized five databases to conduct a comprehensive literature search and yielded 2,270 initial records. RESULTS Thirty-nine intervention studies from 41 peer-reviewed articles met eligibility, including 29 in-region studies (i.e., intervention delivery within SEA, e.g., Thailand, Vietnam) and ten diaspora studies (i.e., interventions delivered to SEA families outside SEA LMICs, e.g., the United States). Out of 31 distinct programs, 13 programs were adapted from prior interventions, 13 were newly developed, and 5 were previously developed for SEA-heritage families. Most studies (n = 34) reported adaptations, with variation found between in-region and diaspora studies. Programs addressed multiple child and family outcomes. Across all studies, preliminary evidence supported effectiveness in enhancing positive parenting, reducing negative parenting, and improving child behavior. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the current review provides support that parenting programs promote child and family well-being among SEA families. It also highlights the need to conduct rigorous research with active controls and well-established measures, document adaptation processes clearly for future implementation, and the potential for public health impact in multiple domains through new and adapted parenting programs for SEA families.
东南亚家庭育儿计划的系统回顾。
以证据为基础的育儿干预措施已被证明可以通过促进亲子沟通、积极育儿和父母自我效能来预防有问题的物质使用和心理健康问题。然而,对来自低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的东南亚(SEA)家庭的父母干预措施的有效性尚未得到充分研究。本综述旨在确定适用于东南亚裔人群的育儿方案,并综合其有效性的证据。方法本研究按照综合无荟萃分析(SWiM)指南进行。该研究利用5个数据库进行了全面的文献检索,获得了2270条初始记录。结果41篇同行评议文章中的39项干预研究符合入选条件,包括29项区域内研究(即在东南亚实施干预,如泰国、越南)和10项散居研究(即向东南亚低收入国家以外的东南亚家庭实施干预,如美国)。在31个不同的项目中,13个项目改编自先前的干预措施,13个是新开发的,5个是以前为sea遗产家庭开发的。大多数研究(n = 34)报告了适应性,在区域内和散居研究之间发现了差异。项目涉及多个儿童和家庭的结果。在所有的研究中,初步证据支持在加强积极父母教育、减少消极父母教育和改善儿童行为方面的有效性。总的来说,本综述支持父母教育计划促进东南亚家庭的儿童和家庭福祉。报告还强调,需要开展严格的研究,采取积极的控制措施和完善的措施,明确记录适应过程,以便今后实施,并通过针对东南亚家庭的新的和经过调整的养育方案,在多个领域对公共卫生产生潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Editors-in-Chief: Dr. Ronald J. Prinz, University of South Carolina and Dr. Thomas H. Ollendick, Virginia Polytechnic Institute Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that provides an international, interdisciplinary forum in which important and new developments in this field are identified and in-depth reviews on current thought and practices are published. The Journal publishes original research reviews, conceptual and theoretical papers, and related work in the broad area of the behavioral sciences that pertains to infants, children, adolescents, and families. Contributions originate from a wide array of disciplines including, but not limited to, psychology (e.g., clinical, community, developmental, family, school), medicine (e.g., family practice, pediatrics, psychiatry), public health, social work, and education. Topical content includes science and application and covers facets of etiology, assessment, description, treatment and intervention, prevention, methodology, and public policy. Submissions are by invitation only and undergo peer review. The Editors, in consultation with the Editorial Board, invite highly qualified experts to contribute original papers on topics of timely interest and significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信