Using 3D-printing technology for patient education: a review of the literature.

IF 3.1 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Sarah Masanet, Marthe-Aline Jutand, Gaëlle Margue, Hélène Hoarau, Jean-Christophe Bernhard
{"title":"Using 3D-printing technology for patient education: a review of the literature.","authors":"Sarah Masanet, Marthe-Aline Jutand, Gaëlle Margue, Hélène Hoarau, Jean-Christophe Bernhard","doi":"10.1186/s41205-025-00296-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>3D printing' is increasingly present in the health sector. The introduction of 3D printed models into the patient care pathway can be seen as a new patient education tool based on the principle of 'see to understand'. The aim of this review is to describe studies investigating the contribution of printed models to patient care and education, and to examine their limitations. A comprehensive PubMed database search was conducted to identify relevant studies. No date, author or language restrictions were imposed. This review focused on studying the impact of a 3D organ model on 5 categories: understanding of the disease and/or the anatomy of the organ, understanding of the surgical plan and its implications, doctor-patient communication, patient satisfaction and patient anxiety. The review selected 45 articles published between 2015 and 2024. Of these, 41 articles investigated the effect of using a 3D model on understanding of the disease and/or the organ concerned. 33 articles evaluated the understanding of treatment, and the risks associated. 13 articles assessed the effect of the model on doctor-patient communication. Patient satisfaction was measured in 22 articles, and 9 articles measured patient anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most of the articles analyzed-27 out of 45-demonstrate a significant enhancement in at least one category of patient education, underscoring the promising potential of 3D technology in this field. However, several methodological limitations temper these promising findings, highlighting the need for further research. Future studies should address these limitations and explore new methodologies to fully exploit 3D's potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":72036,"journal":{"name":"3D printing in medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12522969/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3D printing in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-025-00296-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: 3D printing' is increasingly present in the health sector. The introduction of 3D printed models into the patient care pathway can be seen as a new patient education tool based on the principle of 'see to understand'. The aim of this review is to describe studies investigating the contribution of printed models to patient care and education, and to examine their limitations. A comprehensive PubMed database search was conducted to identify relevant studies. No date, author or language restrictions were imposed. This review focused on studying the impact of a 3D organ model on 5 categories: understanding of the disease and/or the anatomy of the organ, understanding of the surgical plan and its implications, doctor-patient communication, patient satisfaction and patient anxiety. The review selected 45 articles published between 2015 and 2024. Of these, 41 articles investigated the effect of using a 3D model on understanding of the disease and/or the organ concerned. 33 articles evaluated the understanding of treatment, and the risks associated. 13 articles assessed the effect of the model on doctor-patient communication. Patient satisfaction was measured in 22 articles, and 9 articles measured patient anxiety.

Conclusion: Most of the articles analyzed-27 out of 45-demonstrate a significant enhancement in at least one category of patient education, underscoring the promising potential of 3D technology in this field. However, several methodological limitations temper these promising findings, highlighting the need for further research. Future studies should address these limitations and explore new methodologies to fully exploit 3D's potential.

Abstract Image

使用3d打印技术进行患者教育:文献综述。
背景:3D打印在卫生领域的应用越来越广泛。将3D打印模型引入患者护理途径可以被视为一种基于“看即懂”原则的新型患者教育工具。本综述的目的是描述研究打印模型对患者护理和教育的贡献,并检查其局限性。对PubMed数据库进行全面检索以确定相关研究。没有日期、作者或语言限制。这篇综述集中研究了3D器官模型对5个方面的影响:对疾病和/或器官解剖的理解,对手术计划及其影响的理解,医患沟通,患者满意度和患者焦虑。该综述选择了2015年至2024年间发表的45篇文章。其中,41篇文章研究了使用3D模型对了解疾病和/或相关器官的影响。33篇文章评估了对治疗的理解以及相关的风险。13篇文章评估了该模型对医患沟通的影响。22篇文章测量患者满意度,9篇文章测量患者焦虑。结论:分析的大多数文章(45篇中的27篇)表明,至少有一类患者教育得到了显著提高,强调了3D技术在这一领域的巨大潜力。然而,一些方法学上的局限性缓和了这些有希望的发现,突出了进一步研究的必要性。未来的研究应该解决这些限制,并探索新的方法,以充分利用3D的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书