Prevalence, risk factors, and clinical implications of failed spirometry in adults: Results from NHANES 2007-2012.

IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Pulmonology Pub Date : 2025-12-31 Epub Date: 2025-10-14 DOI:10.1080/25310429.2025.2572011
Cuiqiong Dai, Lifei Lu, Zihui Wang, Huajing Yang, Zhili Zou, Yumin Zhou, Pixin Ran
{"title":"Prevalence, risk factors, and clinical implications of failed spirometry in adults: Results from NHANES 2007-2012.","authors":"Cuiqiong Dai, Lifei Lu, Zihui Wang, Huajing Yang, Zhili Zou, Yumin Zhou, Pixin Ran","doi":"10.1080/25310429.2025.2572011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and research question: </strong>Some participants inevitably fail spirometry testing and we aimed to assess the prevalence, risk factors, chronic respiratory symptoms, health status, and all-cause mortality outcomes associated with failed spirometry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using NHANES 2007-2012 data, we categorized participants into three groups: those with failed spirometry (FS-participants), those with qualified spirometry without COPD (QS-non-COPD), and those with qualified spirometry and COPD (QS-COPD). We assessed the prevalence and risk factors associated with FS-participants and compared clinical implications among the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of FS-participants was 4.8%. Key risk factors included older age, being male, non-Hispanic Black ethnicity, lower socioeconomic status, self-reported emphysema, and increased frailty. After adjustment, FS-participants had higher odds of shortness of breath, wheezing, and dry cough at night (all <i>P</i> values < 0.05). They also faced a greater risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.22 to 1.86; <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to the QS-non-COPD group, a risk similar to that of the QS-COPD group (HR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.27; <i>p</i> = 0.675).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Failed spirometry is common among adults and correlates with increased respiratory symptoms and higher all-cause mortality risk, indicating the need for targeted attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":54237,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonology","volume":"31 1","pages":"2572011"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25310429.2025.2572011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and research question: Some participants inevitably fail spirometry testing and we aimed to assess the prevalence, risk factors, chronic respiratory symptoms, health status, and all-cause mortality outcomes associated with failed spirometry.

Methods: Using NHANES 2007-2012 data, we categorized participants into three groups: those with failed spirometry (FS-participants), those with qualified spirometry without COPD (QS-non-COPD), and those with qualified spirometry and COPD (QS-COPD). We assessed the prevalence and risk factors associated with FS-participants and compared clinical implications among the three groups.

Results: The prevalence of FS-participants was 4.8%. Key risk factors included older age, being male, non-Hispanic Black ethnicity, lower socioeconomic status, self-reported emphysema, and increased frailty. After adjustment, FS-participants had higher odds of shortness of breath, wheezing, and dry cough at night (all P values < 0.05). They also faced a greater risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.22 to 1.86; p < 0.001) compared to the QS-non-COPD group, a risk similar to that of the QS-COPD group (HR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.27; p = 0.675).

Conclusion: Failed spirometry is common among adults and correlates with increased respiratory symptoms and higher all-cause mortality risk, indicating the need for targeted attention.

成人肺活量测定失败的患病率、危险因素和临床意义:NHANES 2007-2012的结果
背景和研究问题:一些参与者不可避免地不能通过肺活量测定测试,我们的目的是评估与肺活量测定失败相关的患病率、危险因素、慢性呼吸道症状、健康状况和全因死亡率结果。方法:使用NHANES 2007-2012数据,我们将参与者分为三组:肺活量测定失败组(fs -参与者),肺活量测定合格组(qs -非COPD),肺活量测定合格组(qs -非COPD)和肺活量测定合格组(QS-COPD)。我们评估了与fs参与者相关的患病率和危险因素,并比较了三组患者的临床意义。结果:fs参与者的患病率为4.8%。主要的危险因素包括年龄较大、男性、非西班牙裔黑人、较低的社会经济地位、自我报告的肺气肿和虚弱的增加。调整后,fs参与者夜间出现呼吸短促、喘息和干咳的几率更高(P值均< 0.05)。他们也面临着更高的全因死亡风险(HR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.22 ~ 1.86; p = 0.675)。结论:肺量测定失败在成人中很常见,并与呼吸道症状增加和全因死亡风险升高相关,表明需要有针对性的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pulmonology
Pulmonology Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
159
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: Pulmonology (previously Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia) is the official journal of the Portuguese Society of Pulmonology (Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia/SPP). The journal publishes 6 issues per year and focuses on respiratory system diseases in adults and clinical research. It accepts various types of articles including peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, editorials, and opinion articles. The journal is published in English and is freely accessible through its website, as well as Medline and other databases. It is indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded, Journal of Citation Reports, Index Medicus/MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE/Excerpta Medica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信