An eDelphi Consensus on Key Questions for a Vulvar Health Clinic Intake Questionnaire.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jennifer Foster, Olivia Negris, Olivia Abraham, Christina Kraus, Alicia J Little, Avni Patel, Olushola L Akinshemoyin Vaughn, Melissa M Mauskar
{"title":"An eDelphi Consensus on Key Questions for a Vulvar Health Clinic Intake Questionnaire.","authors":"Jennifer Foster, Olivia Negris, Olivia Abraham, Christina Kraus, Alicia J Little, Avni Patel, Olushola L Akinshemoyin Vaughn, Melissa M Mauskar","doi":"10.1097/LGT.0000000000000919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Vulvar health conditions such as lichen sclerosus and vulvodynia are often misdiagnosed or delayed in diagnosis, leading to worsened clinical outcomes. A standardized intake questionnaire for the initial patient visit could improve early detection and management of these complex conditions. This study aimed to develop a consensus-based standardized intake questionnaire for vulvar health clinics using the eDelphi methodology.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An international eDelphi process was initiated. Specialists in vulvar health were recruited to participate in 2 rounds of online surveys to achieve consensus on key questions. The consensus was defined as 70% agreement among panelists for inclusion or exclusion of questions, with feedback incorporated between rounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 80 panelists from various specialties, including dermatology and gynecology, participated. In the first round, 136 items were reviewed, with 64 meeting consensus for inclusion. After the second round, an additional 20 items were added, leading to a final intake questionnaire consisting of 82 items that were condensed and reorganized to 52 questions and 2 validated surveys (the Vulvar Quality of Life Index and Patient Health Questionnaire 2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study successfully identified key questions for a standardized intake questionnaire for vulvar health clinics using the eDelphi methodology. The methodology may also be applicable to other health conditions requiring structured patient intake processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000919","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Vulvar health conditions such as lichen sclerosus and vulvodynia are often misdiagnosed or delayed in diagnosis, leading to worsened clinical outcomes. A standardized intake questionnaire for the initial patient visit could improve early detection and management of these complex conditions. This study aimed to develop a consensus-based standardized intake questionnaire for vulvar health clinics using the eDelphi methodology.

Materials and methods: An international eDelphi process was initiated. Specialists in vulvar health were recruited to participate in 2 rounds of online surveys to achieve consensus on key questions. The consensus was defined as 70% agreement among panelists for inclusion or exclusion of questions, with feedback incorporated between rounds.

Results: A total of 80 panelists from various specialties, including dermatology and gynecology, participated. In the first round, 136 items were reviewed, with 64 meeting consensus for inclusion. After the second round, an additional 20 items were added, leading to a final intake questionnaire consisting of 82 items that were condensed and reorganized to 52 questions and 2 validated surveys (the Vulvar Quality of Life Index and Patient Health Questionnaire 2).

Conclusions: This study successfully identified key questions for a standardized intake questionnaire for vulvar health clinics using the eDelphi methodology. The methodology may also be applicable to other health conditions requiring structured patient intake processes.

外阴健康门诊摄入问卷关键问题的爱德菲共识。
目的:外阴硬苔、外阴痛等外阴健康状况常被误诊或延误诊断,导致临床预后恶化。一份标准化的初次就诊问卷可以改善这些复杂疾病的早期发现和管理。本研究旨在使用eDelphi方法为外阴健康诊所制定一份基于共识的标准化摄入问卷。材料和方法:采用国际通用的eDelphi工艺。招募外阴健康专家参加两轮在线调查,以就关键问题达成共识。共识被定义为小组成员对纳入或排除问题达成70%的一致意见,并在轮次之间纳入反馈。结果:来自皮肤科、妇科等各专科共80名专家参加。第一轮审议了136个项目,其中64个项目符合协商一致意见。在第二轮之后,又增加了20个项目,最终形成了一份由82个项目组成的问卷,该问卷被浓缩并重组为52个问题和2个有效的调查(外阴生活质量指数和患者健康问卷2)。结论:本研究成功地确定了外阴健康诊所使用eDelphi方法的标准化摄入问卷的关键问题。该方法也可适用于其他需要有组织的病人摄入过程的健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease is the source for the latest science about benign and malignant conditions of the cervix, vagina, vulva, and anus. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original research original research that addresses prevalence, causes, mechanisms, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of lower genital tract disease. We publish clinical guidelines, position papers, cost-effectiveness analyses, narrative reviews, and systematic reviews, including meta-analyses. We also publish papers about research and reporting methods, opinions about controversial medical issues. Of particular note, we encourage material in any of the above mentioned categories that is related to improving patient care, avoiding medical errors, and comparative effectiveness research. We encourage publication of evidence-based guidelines, diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms, and decision aids. Original research and reviews may be sub-classified according to topic: cervix and HPV, vulva and vagina, perianal and anal, basic science, and education and learning. The scope and readership of the journal extend to several disciplines: gynecology, internal medicine, family practice, dermatology, physical therapy, pathology, sociology, psychology, anthropology, sex therapy, and pharmacology. The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease highlights needs for future research, and enhances health care. The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease is the official journal of the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease, and the International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy, and sponsored by the Australian Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology and the Society of Canadian Colposcopists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信