Perspectives of individuals on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change - a scoping review.

IF 2.2 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Ramona Moosburger, Almut Richter, Gert B M Mensink, Kristin Manz, Julia Wagner, Katharina Heldt, Julika Loss
{"title":"Perspectives of individuals on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change - a scoping review.","authors":"Ramona Moosburger, Almut Richter, Gert B M Mensink, Kristin Manz, Julia Wagner, Katharina Heldt, Julika Loss","doi":"10.1186/s40795-025-01171-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As high meat consumption is detrimental to both individual health and the climate, many international organizations recommend a reduction in meat consumption among populations. This scoping review aims to synthesize the evidence on individuals' perspectives on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change. The three research questions focus on (1) the individuals' awareness of the link between meat consumption and climate change, (2) individuals' willingness to reduce their meat consumption to mitigate climate change, and (3) individuals who have already reduced their meat consumption for this purpose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review follows the extended PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews. A systematic search was conducted in five databases (Medline, Scopus, Embase, Greenfile and PsynDex/CurrentContent/Agris via Livivo). Only peer-reviewed original studies, published since 2015, in English, German, Danish or Dutch were included. Two researchers performed all screening procedures. Data from included studies were summarized in a narrative and descriptive synthesis of evidence, separately for quantitative and qualitative studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 93 studies were included. The majority of studies were published since 2019, had a quantitative study design, and were conducted in Europe. Awareness of the link between meat consumption and climate change is low in most studies, and many people underestimate the climate change mitigation potential of meat consumption. Women and people with lower current meat consumption are more willing to reduce their meat consumption. Health and animal welfare are often the main reasons for reducing meat consumption, with climate change being a secondary motivation for most. However, studies varied in the questionnaires used, and many had small sample sizes, limiting comparability and generalizability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Further research using nationwide samples and standardized, validated instruments would improve insight into individuals' perspectives on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change and is crucial to understanding of how to effectively promote a more plant-based diet. As media and political attention to climate change mitigation is increasing, it will be valuable to monitor changes in individual awareness, willingness and motivation to reduce meat consumption across populations worldwide.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This scoping review has been registered at Open Science Framework ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MWB85 ) and the review protocol has been published in BMJ Open.</p>","PeriodicalId":36422,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nutrition","volume":"11 1","pages":"185"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12516871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-025-01171-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As high meat consumption is detrimental to both individual health and the climate, many international organizations recommend a reduction in meat consumption among populations. This scoping review aims to synthesize the evidence on individuals' perspectives on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change. The three research questions focus on (1) the individuals' awareness of the link between meat consumption and climate change, (2) individuals' willingness to reduce their meat consumption to mitigate climate change, and (3) individuals who have already reduced their meat consumption for this purpose.

Methods: This scoping review follows the extended PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews. A systematic search was conducted in five databases (Medline, Scopus, Embase, Greenfile and PsynDex/CurrentContent/Agris via Livivo). Only peer-reviewed original studies, published since 2015, in English, German, Danish or Dutch were included. Two researchers performed all screening procedures. Data from included studies were summarized in a narrative and descriptive synthesis of evidence, separately for quantitative and qualitative studies.

Results: A total of 93 studies were included. The majority of studies were published since 2019, had a quantitative study design, and were conducted in Europe. Awareness of the link between meat consumption and climate change is low in most studies, and many people underestimate the climate change mitigation potential of meat consumption. Women and people with lower current meat consumption are more willing to reduce their meat consumption. Health and animal welfare are often the main reasons for reducing meat consumption, with climate change being a secondary motivation for most. However, studies varied in the questionnaires used, and many had small sample sizes, limiting comparability and generalizability.

Conclusions: Further research using nationwide samples and standardized, validated instruments would improve insight into individuals' perspectives on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change and is crucial to understanding of how to effectively promote a more plant-based diet. As media and political attention to climate change mitigation is increasing, it will be valuable to monitor changes in individual awareness, willingness and motivation to reduce meat consumption across populations worldwide.

Trial registration: This scoping review has been registered at Open Science Framework ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MWB85 ) and the review protocol has been published in BMJ Open.

减少肉类消费以减缓气候变化的个人观点-范围审查。
背景:由于大量肉类消费对个人健康和气候都有害,许多国际组织建议在人群中减少肉类消费。本综述旨在综合个人关于减少肉类消费以缓解气候变化的观点的证据。这三个研究问题集中在(1)个人对肉类消费与气候变化之间联系的认识,(2)个人减少肉类消费以减缓气候变化的意愿,以及(3)已经为此目的减少肉类消费的个人。方法:该范围审查遵循扩展的PRISMA范围审查指南。系统检索5个数据库(Medline、Scopus、Embase、Greenfile和PsynDex/CurrentContent/Agris)。只有2015年以来发表的同行评议的原创研究,以英语、德语、丹麦语或荷兰语发表。两名研究人员执行了所有的筛选程序。纳入研究的数据以叙述性和描述性证据综合的方式进行总结,分别用于定量和定性研究。结果:共纳入93项研究。大多数研究自2019年以来发表,采用定量研究设计,并在欧洲进行。在大多数研究中,人们对肉类消费与气候变化之间的联系认识较低,许多人低估了肉类消费减缓气候变化的潜力。女性和目前肉类消费量较低的人更愿意减少肉类消费量。健康和动物福利往往是减少肉类消费的主要原因,对大多数人来说,气候变化是次要动机。然而,研究使用的问卷各不相同,许多研究的样本量很小,限制了可比性和概括性。结论:使用全国范围内的样本和标准化的、经过验证的工具进行进一步的研究,将有助于深入了解减少肉类消费以缓解气候变化的个人观点,对于理解如何有效地促进更多的植物性饮食至关重要。随着媒体和政治对减缓气候变化的关注日益增加,监测全世界人口减少肉类消费的个人意识、意愿和动机的变化将是有价值的。试验注册:本综述已在Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MWB85)上注册,综述方案已在BMJ Open上发表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nutrition
BMC Nutrition Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信