Prognostic Impact of Organ-Specific Metastasis in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Woo Kyung Ryu, Munkhtsatsral Ganbaatar, Nuri Park, Hyun Young Lee, Hwan-Cheol Kim, Jeong-Seon Ryu, Jun Hyeok Lim
{"title":"Prognostic Impact of Organ-Specific Metastasis in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.","authors":"Woo Kyung Ryu, Munkhtsatsral Ganbaatar, Nuri Park, Hyun Young Lee, Hwan-Cheol Kim, Jeong-Seon Ryu, Jun Hyeok Lim","doi":"10.4143/crt.2025.238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prognostic stratification is essential in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to guide treatment decisions. While the TNM staging system has evolved to refine the M category based on metastatic burden, it does not account for differences in prognosis based on the specific organ affected. This study evaluates whether incorporating organ-specific metastasis improves prognostic discrimination in stage IV NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Korean Central Cancer Registry (2014-2018). Patients with stage IV NSCLC were classified according to the 9th edition TNM classification: M1b (single-organ, single metastasis), M1c1 (multiple metastases within a single organ), and M1c2 (multiple organ metastases). Survival outcomes were compared across groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3,165 patients, 56.5% had single-organ metastases, while 43.5% had multiple organ metastases. Median overall survival (OS) was longest in M1b (8.0 months), followed by M1c1 (6.0 months), and shortest in M1c2 (5.9 months) (p<0.001). However, survival varied by metastatic organ. Liver, adrenal, and uncommon-site metastases were associated with significantly worse OS, even among M1b patients. Some M1b and M1c1 patients with high-risk organ metastases had worse survival than M1c2 patients, challenging the TNM-defined prognostic hierarchy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current TNM M category does not fully capture the prognostic impact of metastatic organ involvement. Incorporating organ-specific metastases into staging and prognostic models could refine risk stratification and improve personalized treatment approaches for stage IV NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":49094,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2025.238","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Prognostic stratification is essential in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to guide treatment decisions. While the TNM staging system has evolved to refine the M category based on metastatic burden, it does not account for differences in prognosis based on the specific organ affected. This study evaluates whether incorporating organ-specific metastasis improves prognostic discrimination in stage IV NSCLC.

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Korean Central Cancer Registry (2014-2018). Patients with stage IV NSCLC were classified according to the 9th edition TNM classification: M1b (single-organ, single metastasis), M1c1 (multiple metastases within a single organ), and M1c2 (multiple organ metastases). Survival outcomes were compared across groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

Results: Among 3,165 patients, 56.5% had single-organ metastases, while 43.5% had multiple organ metastases. Median overall survival (OS) was longest in M1b (8.0 months), followed by M1c1 (6.0 months), and shortest in M1c2 (5.9 months) (p<0.001). However, survival varied by metastatic organ. Liver, adrenal, and uncommon-site metastases were associated with significantly worse OS, even among M1b patients. Some M1b and M1c1 patients with high-risk organ metastases had worse survival than M1c2 patients, challenging the TNM-defined prognostic hierarchy.

Conclusion: The current TNM M category does not fully capture the prognostic impact of metastatic organ involvement. Incorporating organ-specific metastases into staging and prognostic models could refine risk stratification and improve personalized treatment approaches for stage IV NSCLC.

非小细胞肺癌器官特异性转移对预后的影响。
目的:在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中,预后分层对指导治疗决策至关重要。虽然TNM分期系统已经发展到基于转移负担的M分类,但它并不能解释基于受影响的特定器官的预后差异。本研究评估合并器官特异性转移是否能改善IV期非小细胞肺癌的预后鉴别。材料和方法:我们使用韩国中央癌症登记处(2014-2018)的数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究。IV期NSCLC患者按照第9版TNM分类:M1b(单器官、单转移)、M1c1(单器官内多发转移)、M1c2(多器官转移)。采用Kaplan-Meier分析和Cox比例风险模型比较各组的生存结果。结果:3165例患者中,56.5%为单器官转移,43.5%为多器官转移。中位总生存期(OS)在M1b中最长(8.0个月),其次是M1c1(6.0个月),M1c2中最短(5.9个月)(结论:目前的TNM M分类不能完全反映转移性器官受累的预后影响。将器官特异性转移纳入分期和预后模型可以完善IV期非小细胞肺癌的风险分层和改进个性化治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
126
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Research and Treatment is a peer-reviewed open access publication of the Korean Cancer Association. It is published quarterly, one volume per year. Abbreviated title is Cancer Res Treat. It accepts manuscripts relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research. Subjects include carcinogenesis, tumor biology, molecular oncology, cancer genetics, tumor immunology, epidemiology, predictive markers and cancer prevention, pathology, cancer diagnosis, screening and therapies including chemotherapy, surgery, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, gene therapy, multimodality treatment and palliative care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信