[Comparison of the effects of intensified lifestyle and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist combined with lifestyle intervention on body composition in adult patients with overweight or obesity].

Q3 Medicine
Y T Chen, C L Chen, Z Ying, S S Chen, Y Chen, X Y Li
{"title":"[Comparison of the effects of intensified lifestyle and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist combined with lifestyle intervention on body composition in adult patients with overweight or obesity].","authors":"Y T Chen, C L Chen, Z Ying, S S Chen, Y Chen, X Y Li","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20250305-00530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Comparison of the impact of intensified lifestyle and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) combined with lifestyle intervention on body composition in adult patients with overweight or obesity. <b>Methods:</b> The clinical data of 197 overweight or obese patients who were treated at the Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University from February 2022 to June 2024 were retrospectively analyzed, including 75 males and 122 females, aged (36.7±10.9) years. Patients were divided into an intensified lifestyle intervention group (<i>n</i>=84) and a GLP-1RA combined with lifestyle therapy group (<i>n</i>=113) based on the intervention approach. Collected clinical data of patients. After adjusting for gender, age, and baseline BMI using generalized linear models, analyze the association between the changes in various indicators [including body weight, body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage, fat mass (FM), fat mass index (FMI), fat-free mass (FFM), and fat-free mass index (FFMI)] and the intervention methods. <b>Results:</b> Body weight, BMI, waist circumference, diastolic blood pressure, FM, FFM, FMI, FFMI, fasting blood glucose, insulin resistance index, alanine aminotransferase, and controlled attenuation parameter were lower in the intensive lifestyle intervention group compared to the GLP-1RA combined with lifestyle intervention group (all <i>P</i>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, gender, systolic blood pressure, body fat percentage, total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, aspartate aminotransferase, and elasticity values (all <i>P</i>0.05). After 12 weeks of intervention, the results of the generalized linear model showed that the reduction magnitudes of body weight, FFM, and FFMI were associated with the intervention methods (all <i>P</i>0.05). The GLP-1RA combined with lifestyle intervention group showed greater reductions in body weight [(7.8±4.3) vs (5.1±4.5) kg], FFM [(2.2±2.1) vs (1.0±1.9) kg], and FFMI [(0.7±0.5) vs (0.3±0.5) kg/m<sup>2</sup>] compared to the intensive lifestyle intervention group (all <i>P</i>0.05). After 24 weeks of intervention, both groups exhibited decreases in post-weight-loss body weight, BMI, body fat percentage, FM, FFM, FMI, and FFMI compared to pre-weight-loss values (all <i>P</i>0.001). The results of the generalized linear model indicated that the reduction magnitudes of body fat percentage, FM, FFM, FMI, and FFMI were associated with the intervention methods (all <i>P</i>0.05). The intensive lifestyle intervention group showed greater reductions in body fat percentage (5.8%±3.0% vs 3.9%±4.2%), FM[(8.9±4.1) vs (7.0±5.7) kg], and FMI [(3.1±1.4) vs (2.4±1.9) kg/m<sup>2</sup>] compared to the GLP-1RA combined with lifestyle intervention group, while the reductions in FFM [(1.5±2.5) vs (2.8±3.4) kg] and FFMI [(0.5±0.9) vs (0.9±1.2) kg/m<sup>2</sup>] were smaller (all <i>P</i>0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> In weight loss treatment, the intensive lifestyle retains more lean body mass than the GLP-1RA combined lifestyle.</p>","PeriodicalId":24023,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","volume":"105 37","pages":"3304-3310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20250305-00530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Comparison of the impact of intensified lifestyle and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) combined with lifestyle intervention on body composition in adult patients with overweight or obesity. Methods: The clinical data of 197 overweight or obese patients who were treated at the Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University from February 2022 to June 2024 were retrospectively analyzed, including 75 males and 122 females, aged (36.7±10.9) years. Patients were divided into an intensified lifestyle intervention group (n=84) and a GLP-1RA combined with lifestyle therapy group (n=113) based on the intervention approach. Collected clinical data of patients. After adjusting for gender, age, and baseline BMI using generalized linear models, analyze the association between the changes in various indicators [including body weight, body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage, fat mass (FM), fat mass index (FMI), fat-free mass (FFM), and fat-free mass index (FFMI)] and the intervention methods. Results: Body weight, BMI, waist circumference, diastolic blood pressure, FM, FFM, FMI, FFMI, fasting blood glucose, insulin resistance index, alanine aminotransferase, and controlled attenuation parameter were lower in the intensive lifestyle intervention group compared to the GLP-1RA combined with lifestyle intervention group (all P0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, gender, systolic blood pressure, body fat percentage, total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, aspartate aminotransferase, and elasticity values (all P0.05). After 12 weeks of intervention, the results of the generalized linear model showed that the reduction magnitudes of body weight, FFM, and FFMI were associated with the intervention methods (all P0.05). The GLP-1RA combined with lifestyle intervention group showed greater reductions in body weight [(7.8±4.3) vs (5.1±4.5) kg], FFM [(2.2±2.1) vs (1.0±1.9) kg], and FFMI [(0.7±0.5) vs (0.3±0.5) kg/m2] compared to the intensive lifestyle intervention group (all P0.05). After 24 weeks of intervention, both groups exhibited decreases in post-weight-loss body weight, BMI, body fat percentage, FM, FFM, FMI, and FFMI compared to pre-weight-loss values (all P0.001). The results of the generalized linear model indicated that the reduction magnitudes of body fat percentage, FM, FFM, FMI, and FFMI were associated with the intervention methods (all P0.05). The intensive lifestyle intervention group showed greater reductions in body fat percentage (5.8%±3.0% vs 3.9%±4.2%), FM[(8.9±4.1) vs (7.0±5.7) kg], and FMI [(3.1±1.4) vs (2.4±1.9) kg/m2] compared to the GLP-1RA combined with lifestyle intervention group, while the reductions in FFM [(1.5±2.5) vs (2.8±3.4) kg] and FFMI [(0.5±0.9) vs (0.9±1.2) kg/m2] were smaller (all P0.05). Conclusion: In weight loss treatment, the intensive lifestyle retains more lean body mass than the GLP-1RA combined lifestyle.

[生活方式强化与胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂联合生活方式干预对成人超重或肥胖患者体成分的影响比较]。
目的:比较强化生活方式与胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)联合生活方式干预对成人超重或肥胖患者体成分的影响。方法:回顾性分析2022年2月~ 2024年6月复旦大学中山医院收治的197例超重或肥胖患者的临床资料,其中男性75例,女性122例,年龄(36.7±10.9)岁。根据干预方式将患者分为强化生活方式干预组(n=84)和GLP-1RA联合生活方式治疗组(n=113)。收集患者的临床资料。采用广义线性模型对性别、年龄、基线BMI进行调整后,分析各指标[包括体重、体质量指数(BMI)、体脂率、脂肪质量(FM)、脂肪质量指数(FMI)、无脂质量(FFM)、无脂质量指数(FFMI)]变化与干预方法的相关性。结果:生活方式强化干预组体重、BMI、腰围、舒张压、FM、FFM、FMI、FFMI、空腹血糖、胰岛素抵抗指数、丙氨酸转氨酶、控制衰减参数均低于GLP-1RA联合生活方式干预组(均P0.05)。两组患者年龄、性别、收缩压、体脂率、总胆固醇、甘油三酯、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、天冬氨酸转氨酶、弹性值比较,差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。干预12周后,广义线性模型结果显示,体重、FFM、FFMI的降低幅度与干预方式相关(均P0.05)。与强化生活方式干预组相比,GLP-1RA联合生活方式干预组的体重[(7.8±4.3)vs(5.1±4.5)kg]、FFM[(2.2±2.1)vs(1.0±1.9)kg]、FFMI[(0.7±0.5)vs(0.3±0.5)kg/m2]下降幅度更大(均P0.05)。干预24周后,两组患者减肥后体重、BMI、体脂率、FM、FFM、FMI和FFMI均较减肥前下降(均P0.001)。广义线性模型结果显示,体脂率、FM、FFM、FMI和FFMI的降低幅度与干预方法相关(均P0.05)。与GLP-1RA联合生活方式干预组相比,强化生活方式干预组体脂率(5.8%±3.0% vs 3.9%±4.2%)、FM[(8.9±4.1)vs(7.0±5.7)kg]、FMI[(3.1±1.4)vs(2.4±1.9)kg/m2]的降低幅度更大,而FFM[(1.5±2.5)vs(2.8±3.4)kg]、FFMI[(0.5±0.9)vs(0.9±1.2)kg/m2]的降低幅度更小(均P0.05)。结论:在减肥治疗中,强化生活方式比GLP-1RA联合生活方式保留了更多的瘦体重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
400
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信