The components of the instrumented timed-up-and-go test may explain balance impairments, gait and weight-bearing asymmetries, and trunk muscle activation disorders.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Raide A González-Carbonell, Igor Salinas-Sánchez
{"title":"The components of the instrumented timed-up-and-go test may explain balance impairments, gait and weight-bearing asymmetries, and trunk muscle activation disorders.","authors":"Raide A González-Carbonell, Igor Salinas-Sánchez","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with unilateral lower-limb amputation (LLA) are exposed to conditions such as low-back pain, which limit everyday activities and trunk musculature for stability.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the trunk kinematics and muscle activation of lumbar-erector-spinae (LES) and rectus-abdominis during the instrumented timed-up-and-go (iTUG) test and its correlation with co-activation, muscle activation pattern, gait asymmetry, and center-of-pressure (CoP) sway measures between individuals with and without LLA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The kinematic (trunk forward and lateral flexion, and rotation) and the ratio of muscle activation of LES over rectus-abdominis (LRR) were compared between LLA (n = 26) and the control (n = 16) performing the iTUG test, gait (symmetry-index [SI], co-activation index, and muscle activation pattern), and static test (measures of CoP sway).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The LLA group showed greater alterations in balance indicators than the control (iTUG duration, gait SI, weight-bearing SI, CoP-excursion, and CoP-velocity). The trunk's kinematic variables were higher during turn-to-sit than in sit-to-walk, but the LRR was higher during sit-to-walk. The turn-to-sit peak-angular-velocity significantly correlated with the LRR, co-activation index, gait SI, weight-bearing SI, and the measurements of CoP sway.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The peak-angular-velocity of the turn-to-sit component indicates balance impairment and trunk muscle disorders better than the iTUG duration or turning times. Slow turning movements may be linked to increased CoP sway, gait and weight-bearing asymmetries, and muscle activation issues in the LES during daily activities, which could raise the risk of low-back pain over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":" ","pages":"297-303"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000487","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individuals with unilateral lower-limb amputation (LLA) are exposed to conditions such as low-back pain, which limit everyday activities and trunk musculature for stability.

Objective: To determine the trunk kinematics and muscle activation of lumbar-erector-spinae (LES) and rectus-abdominis during the instrumented timed-up-and-go (iTUG) test and its correlation with co-activation, muscle activation pattern, gait asymmetry, and center-of-pressure (CoP) sway measures between individuals with and without LLA.

Methods: The kinematic (trunk forward and lateral flexion, and rotation) and the ratio of muscle activation of LES over rectus-abdominis (LRR) were compared between LLA (n = 26) and the control (n = 16) performing the iTUG test, gait (symmetry-index [SI], co-activation index, and muscle activation pattern), and static test (measures of CoP sway).

Results: The LLA group showed greater alterations in balance indicators than the control (iTUG duration, gait SI, weight-bearing SI, CoP-excursion, and CoP-velocity). The trunk's kinematic variables were higher during turn-to-sit than in sit-to-walk, but the LRR was higher during sit-to-walk. The turn-to-sit peak-angular-velocity significantly correlated with the LRR, co-activation index, gait SI, weight-bearing SI, and the measurements of CoP sway.

Conclusions: The peak-angular-velocity of the turn-to-sit component indicates balance impairment and trunk muscle disorders better than the iTUG duration or turning times. Slow turning movements may be linked to increased CoP sway, gait and weight-bearing asymmetries, and muscle activation issues in the LES during daily activities, which could raise the risk of low-back pain over time.

仪器计时测试的组成部分可以解释平衡障碍、步态和负重不对称以及躯干肌肉激活障碍。
背景:单侧下肢截肢(LLA)患者暴露于腰痛等条件下,这限制了日常活动和躯干肌肉的稳定性。目的:探讨LLA患者和非LLA患者在器械定时起跑(iTUG)试验中腰直肌和腰直肌(LES)的躯干运动学和肌肉激活及其与共激活、肌肉激活模式、步态不对称和压力中心(CoP)摇摆测量的相关性。方法:比较LLA (n = 26)和对照组(n = 16)进行iTUG测试、步态(对称指数[SI]、共激活指数和肌肉激活模式)和静态测试(CoP摇摆测量)的运动学(躯干前屈、侧屈和旋转)和LES肌肉激活与腹直肌(LRR)的比值。结果:与对照组相比,LLA组在平衡指标(iTUG持续时间、步态SI、负重SI、cop -偏移和cop -速度)方面的变化更大。躯干的运动学变量在转坐时高于坐走,但LRR在坐走时更高。转坐峰值角速度与LRR、共激活指数、步态SI、负重SI和CoP摇摆测量值显著相关。结论:与iTUG持续时间和翻身次数相比,转坐分量的峰值角速度更能反映平衡障碍和躯干肌肉障碍。缓慢的转身动作可能会增加CoP摆动,步态和负重不对称,以及日常活动中LES的肌肉激活问题,随着时间的推移,这可能会增加腰痛的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书