Neighborhood Social Vulnerability and Access to Expedited Partner Therapy Prescriptions: A Secret Shopper Audit Survey.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Rachel E Solnick, Carmen C Vargas- Torres, Alexa Guastello, Marissa Seldes, Kelsey Simpson, Patricia Mae Martinez, Michael Grant, Ethan Cowan
{"title":"Neighborhood Social Vulnerability and Access to Expedited Partner Therapy Prescriptions: A Secret Shopper Audit Survey.","authors":"Rachel E Solnick, Carmen C Vargas- Torres, Alexa Guastello, Marissa Seldes, Kelsey Simpson, Patricia Mae Martinez, Michael Grant, Ethan Cowan","doi":"10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) disproportionately affect socially vulnerable populations. Expedited Partner Therapy (EPT) reduces reinfection rates by treating partners without requiring a medical visit yet remains underutilized in the electronic prescription era. Studies show low pharmacist awareness of EPT, with limited research on its real-world availability in pharmacies or variability by Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) factors. This study assessed pharmacist awareness and willingness to fill hypothetical nameless electronic EPT prescriptions in New York City (NYC) pharmacies and examined variations by SVI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional audit survey of 335 NYC pharmacies employed a telephone-based secret shopper approach. Pharmacist awareness of EPT, willingness to fill, and insurance acceptance were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression examined associations with SVI, adjusting for pharmacy type, location, and local chlamydia rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of surveyed pharmacies, 40% were aware of EPT, with significantly lower awareness in non-chain pharmacies than national chains (34% vs. 54%, p = 0.02). Only 28% of pharmacists stated they would be willing to fill nameless prescriptions. Most prescriptions (34%) would be filled under the index patient's name, and 86% would accept insurance. Common reasons for refusal included unfamiliarity with EPT (62%) and misconceptions about legal name requirements (28%). Awareness was higher in pharmacies located in the highest SVI quartile (OR 3.7; 95% CI 1.4-10.8), but willingness to fill did not vary by SVI (p = 0.35).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite greater EPT awareness in socioeconomically vulnerable areas, pharmacist willingness to fill nameless EPT prescriptions remains limited across areas. Efforts to educate pharmacists and standardize e-prescribing processes are needed to expand EPT access and reduce STI disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":21837,"journal":{"name":"Sexually transmitted diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexually transmitted diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002252","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) disproportionately affect socially vulnerable populations. Expedited Partner Therapy (EPT) reduces reinfection rates by treating partners without requiring a medical visit yet remains underutilized in the electronic prescription era. Studies show low pharmacist awareness of EPT, with limited research on its real-world availability in pharmacies or variability by Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) factors. This study assessed pharmacist awareness and willingness to fill hypothetical nameless electronic EPT prescriptions in New York City (NYC) pharmacies and examined variations by SVI.

Methods: A cross-sectional audit survey of 335 NYC pharmacies employed a telephone-based secret shopper approach. Pharmacist awareness of EPT, willingness to fill, and insurance acceptance were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression examined associations with SVI, adjusting for pharmacy type, location, and local chlamydia rates.

Results: Of surveyed pharmacies, 40% were aware of EPT, with significantly lower awareness in non-chain pharmacies than national chains (34% vs. 54%, p = 0.02). Only 28% of pharmacists stated they would be willing to fill nameless prescriptions. Most prescriptions (34%) would be filled under the index patient's name, and 86% would accept insurance. Common reasons for refusal included unfamiliarity with EPT (62%) and misconceptions about legal name requirements (28%). Awareness was higher in pharmacies located in the highest SVI quartile (OR 3.7; 95% CI 1.4-10.8), but willingness to fill did not vary by SVI (p = 0.35).

Conclusions: Despite greater EPT awareness in socioeconomically vulnerable areas, pharmacist willingness to fill nameless EPT prescriptions remains limited across areas. Efforts to educate pharmacists and standardize e-prescribing processes are needed to expand EPT access and reduce STI disparities.

邻里社会脆弱性和获得快速伙伴治疗处方:一个秘密购物者审计调查。
背景:性传播感染(STIs)不成比例地影响社会弱势群体。快速伴侣治疗(EPT)通过治疗伴侣而无需医疗访问来降低再感染率,但在电子处方时代仍未得到充分利用。研究表明,药剂师对EPT的认知度较低,对其在药店的实际可用性或社会脆弱性指数(SVI)因素的变异性的研究有限。本研究评估了纽约市(NYC)药房药剂师填写假设的无名电子EPT处方的意识和意愿,并通过SVI检查了变化。方法:对纽约市335家药店进行横断面审计调查,采用基于电话的秘密购物者方法。评估药师对EPT的认知度、填写意愿和保险接受程度。多变量逻辑回归检验了与SVI的关系,调整了药房类型、地点和当地衣原体发病率。结果:受访药房中有40%的药房知晓EPT,非连锁药店知晓度明显低于全国连锁药店(34% vs. 54%, p = 0.02)。只有28%的药剂师表示他们愿意开无名处方。大多数处方(34%)会以索引患者的名字填写,86%的人会接受保险。常见的拒绝原因包括不熟悉EPT(62%)和对法定名称要求的误解(28%)。在SVI最高的四分位数(OR 3.7; 95% CI 1.4-10.8)中,药房的认知度较高,但填充意愿没有因SVI而变化(p = 0.35)。结论:尽管社会经济脆弱地区对EPT的认识较高,但药剂师填写无名EPT处方的意愿仍然有限。需要努力教育药剂师和规范电子处方流程,以扩大EPT的可及性,减少性传播感染的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexually transmitted diseases
Sexually transmitted diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.10%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Sexually Transmitted Diseases, the official journal of the American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association​, publishes peer-reviewed, original articles on clinical, laboratory, immunologic, epidemiologic, behavioral, public health, and historical topics pertaining to sexually transmitted diseases and related fields. Reports from the CDC and NIH provide up-to-the-minute information. A highly respected editorial board is composed of prominent scientists who are leaders in this rapidly changing field. Included in each issue are studies and developments from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信