Chiara de Bellegarde de Saint Lary , Marieke L.A. de Hoog , Lotte Jonker , Johan Reimerink , Renée A.H. van Schaijk , Leo G. Visser , Susan Hahné , Patricia C.J.L. Bruijning-Verhagen
{"title":"ZIeKA monitor study: travel-related arbovirus infections among Dutch travellers, 2018–2020","authors":"Chiara de Bellegarde de Saint Lary , Marieke L.A. de Hoog , Lotte Jonker , Johan Reimerink , Renée A.H. van Schaijk , Leo G. Visser , Susan Hahné , Patricia C.J.L. Bruijning-Verhagen","doi":"10.1016/j.tmaid.2025.102921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study aims to estimate the incidence of arbovirus infections among Dutch travellers and subsequent potential risk of importation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>For this prospective, fully remote study, Dutch travellers visiting arbovirus endemic countries between August 2018 to March 2020 were recruited through (social) media and travel-clinics. Interested travellers could register online. Participants completed questionnaires and kept a daily symptom log during travel using a custom-made study app. Travellers reporting symptoms suggestive of arbovirus infection were invited to self-collect a dry-blood spot sample (DBS) upon return. In a sub-cohort of participants, post-travel DBS were also collected if asymptomatic. Participants mailed the DBS to the laboratory to be tested by PCR for ZIKV, DENV and CHIKV, along with IgG and IgM antibody testing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 1222 subjects registering online, 737 (60.3 %) completed the baseline questionnaire and ≥60 % of symptom diaries and were included in the analysis. Arbovirus-like symptoms were reported by 73 participants (9.9 %). A post-travel DBS was obtained from 67 symptomatic and 154 asymptomatic travellers. None were RT-PCR positive for ZIKV, DENV or CHIKV. Two symptomatic travellers were IgM positive indicating probable recent arbovirus infection. An additional ten cases were IgG positive/IgM negative suggesting possible previous arbovirus exposure. The estimated incidence proportion and rate of travel-related arbovirus infection were 2.7–16.3/1000 trips and 3.9–23.4/1000 person-months, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While a small proportion of travellers to arbovirus endemic areas have evidence of recent infection, the risk of arbovirus importation by returning travellers appears low as viraemia was not detected in any participant upon return.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23312,"journal":{"name":"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease","volume":"68 ","pages":"Article 102921"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477893925001279","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
This study aims to estimate the incidence of arbovirus infections among Dutch travellers and subsequent potential risk of importation.
Methods
For this prospective, fully remote study, Dutch travellers visiting arbovirus endemic countries between August 2018 to March 2020 were recruited through (social) media and travel-clinics. Interested travellers could register online. Participants completed questionnaires and kept a daily symptom log during travel using a custom-made study app. Travellers reporting symptoms suggestive of arbovirus infection were invited to self-collect a dry-blood spot sample (DBS) upon return. In a sub-cohort of participants, post-travel DBS were also collected if asymptomatic. Participants mailed the DBS to the laboratory to be tested by PCR for ZIKV, DENV and CHIKV, along with IgG and IgM antibody testing.
Results
Of 1222 subjects registering online, 737 (60.3 %) completed the baseline questionnaire and ≥60 % of symptom diaries and were included in the analysis. Arbovirus-like symptoms were reported by 73 participants (9.9 %). A post-travel DBS was obtained from 67 symptomatic and 154 asymptomatic travellers. None were RT-PCR positive for ZIKV, DENV or CHIKV. Two symptomatic travellers were IgM positive indicating probable recent arbovirus infection. An additional ten cases were IgG positive/IgM negative suggesting possible previous arbovirus exposure. The estimated incidence proportion and rate of travel-related arbovirus infection were 2.7–16.3/1000 trips and 3.9–23.4/1000 person-months, respectively.
Conclusion
While a small proportion of travellers to arbovirus endemic areas have evidence of recent infection, the risk of arbovirus importation by returning travellers appears low as viraemia was not detected in any participant upon return.
期刊介绍:
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
Publication Scope:
Publishes original papers, reviews, and consensus papers
Primary theme: infectious disease in the context of travel medicine
Focus Areas:
Epidemiology and surveillance of travel-related illness
Prevention and treatment of travel-associated infections
Malaria prevention and treatment
Travellers' diarrhoea
Infections associated with mass gatherings
Migration-related infections
Vaccines and vaccine-preventable disease
Global policy/regulations for disease prevention and control
Practical clinical issues for travel and tropical medicine practitioners
Coverage:
Addresses areas of controversy and debate in travel medicine
Aims to inform guidelines and policy pertinent to travel medicine and the prevention of infectious disease
Publication Features:
Offers a fast peer-review process
Provides early online publication of accepted manuscripts
Aims to publish cutting-edge papers