Investigation of the toxicological effects of PFAS on cholangiocarcinoma based on network toxicology, bioinformatics, and molecular docking.

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Huazheng Sun, Jian Li, Changpu Du, Kangmin Zhou, Zhenzhen Wu, Jia Deng, Guo Chen, Ailing Liang, Bing Yang, Dongxin Tang
{"title":"Investigation of the toxicological effects of PFAS on cholangiocarcinoma based on network toxicology, bioinformatics, and molecular docking.","authors":"Huazheng Sun, Jian Li, Changpu Du, Kangmin Zhou, Zhenzhen Wu, Jia Deng, Guo Chen, Ailing Liang, Bing Yang, Dongxin Tang","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-19590-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies have identified an association between per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and the occurrence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), but the specific mechanisms remain unclear. This study aims to analyze the toxicological mechanisms of PFAS, particularly perfluoroctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (), on ICC through network toxicology and bioinformatics. Relevant targets for PFOS and PFOA were retrieved from the CTD, ChEMBL, and Super-PRED databases. Targets related to ICC were gathered from the GeneCards, NCBI, and OMIM databases. Common targets between ICC and PFOS, PFOA were identified and subjected to median filtering in CytoHubba to select core targets, which were then analyzed for protein-protein interaction using the STRING database. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses were performed on core targets to elucidate the biological processes affected by PFAS in ICC. The intersection of the targets for ICC and those from PFOS/PFOA was compared with the differentially expressed genes in ICC from the TCGA database. LASSO regression was applied to filter prediction targets, and bioinformatics analysis was conducted to assess the differential expression of these targets in ICC, constructing a risk assessment model. Molecular docking was utilized to evaluate the binding affinity of PFOA and PFOS to the predicted targets. A total of 1,838 and 2,616 targets were predicted for PFOA and PFOS, respectively; whereas, for ICC, 2,044 targets were identified, with 345 and 459 common targets for PFOA and PFOS, respectively. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses revealed that these processes were primarily associated with biological functions such as cell proliferation and apoptosis, potentially mediated by the PI3K-Akt and HIF-1 signaling pathways. The integrated analysis of differentially expressed genes from the TCGA database and the intersection of targets from PFOA/PFOS with those from ICC yielded five core genes (TP53, ESR1, CDH1, BCL2, and MMP9) that formed an ICC prognostic score with robust predictive capability for survival, classifying ICC patients into high-risk and low-risk groups (p < 0.05). Molecular docking simulations demonstrated strong binding affinities between PFAS and these core targets, supporting their potential roles in PFAS-induced ICC development. This study explores the potential key mechanisms underlying PFAS-induced ICC and highlights core biomarkers that could serve as therapeutic targets. These results are expected to offer novel perspectives on strategies for the prevention and treatment of ICC.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"35715"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518873/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-19590-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have identified an association between per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and the occurrence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), but the specific mechanisms remain unclear. This study aims to analyze the toxicological mechanisms of PFAS, particularly perfluoroctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (), on ICC through network toxicology and bioinformatics. Relevant targets for PFOS and PFOA were retrieved from the CTD, ChEMBL, and Super-PRED databases. Targets related to ICC were gathered from the GeneCards, NCBI, and OMIM databases. Common targets between ICC and PFOS, PFOA were identified and subjected to median filtering in CytoHubba to select core targets, which were then analyzed for protein-protein interaction using the STRING database. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses were performed on core targets to elucidate the biological processes affected by PFAS in ICC. The intersection of the targets for ICC and those from PFOS/PFOA was compared with the differentially expressed genes in ICC from the TCGA database. LASSO regression was applied to filter prediction targets, and bioinformatics analysis was conducted to assess the differential expression of these targets in ICC, constructing a risk assessment model. Molecular docking was utilized to evaluate the binding affinity of PFOA and PFOS to the predicted targets. A total of 1,838 and 2,616 targets were predicted for PFOA and PFOS, respectively; whereas, for ICC, 2,044 targets were identified, with 345 and 459 common targets for PFOA and PFOS, respectively. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses revealed that these processes were primarily associated with biological functions such as cell proliferation and apoptosis, potentially mediated by the PI3K-Akt and HIF-1 signaling pathways. The integrated analysis of differentially expressed genes from the TCGA database and the intersection of targets from PFOA/PFOS with those from ICC yielded five core genes (TP53, ESR1, CDH1, BCL2, and MMP9) that formed an ICC prognostic score with robust predictive capability for survival, classifying ICC patients into high-risk and low-risk groups (p < 0.05). Molecular docking simulations demonstrated strong binding affinities between PFAS and these core targets, supporting their potential roles in PFAS-induced ICC development. This study explores the potential key mechanisms underlying PFAS-induced ICC and highlights core biomarkers that could serve as therapeutic targets. These results are expected to offer novel perspectives on strategies for the prevention and treatment of ICC.

基于网络毒理学、生物信息学和分子对接的PFAS对胆管癌毒理学效应研究。
先前的研究已经确定了全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)与肝内胆管癌(ICC)的发生之间的关联,但具体机制尚不清楚。本研究旨在通过网络毒理学和生物信息学分析全氟辛烷磺酸,特别是全氟辛酸(PFOA)和全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOA)对ICC的毒理学机制。从CTD、ChEMBL和Super-PRED数据库中检索PFOS和PFOA的相关靶点。与ICC相关的目标从GeneCards、NCBI和OMIM数据库中收集。对ICC与PFOS、PFOA之间的共同靶点进行鉴定,并在CytoHubba中进行中值滤波,选择核心靶点,然后使用STRING数据库分析蛋白-蛋白相互作用。对核心靶点进行基因本体(GO)和京都基因与基因组百科全书(KEGG)富集分析,以阐明PFAS对ICC生物过程的影响。将ICC靶基因与PFOS/PFOA靶基因的交集与TCGA数据库中ICC的差异表达基因进行比较。应用LASSO回归筛选预测靶点,并进行生物信息学分析,评估这些靶点在ICC中的差异表达,构建风险评估模型。利用分子对接方法评价PFOA和PFOS对预测靶点的结合亲和力。PFOA和PFOS的预测靶标分别为1838个和2616个;而对于ICC,确定了2,044个目标,其中PFOA和PFOS分别为345个和459个共同目标。GO和KEGG富集分析显示,这些过程主要与细胞增殖和凋亡等生物学功能相关,可能由PI3K-Akt和HIF-1信号通路介导。对TCGA数据库中差异表达基因的综合分析,以及PFOA/PFOS靶点与ICC靶点的交叉分析,得出了5个核心基因(TP53、ESR1、CDH1、BCL2和MMP9),形成了具有强大生存预测能力的ICC预后评分,将ICC患者分为高风险和低风险组(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信