Socioeconomic Status and Stroke Risk in Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease: A DISPLACE Study Secondary Analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Jeffrey G Edwards, Daniel T Humphrey, Martina Mueller, Shannon Phillips, Alyssa Schlenz, Morohuntodun O Oni, Julie Kanter, Kira Bona, Natasha M Archer
{"title":"Socioeconomic Status and Stroke Risk in Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease: A DISPLACE Study Secondary Analysis.","authors":"Jeffrey G Edwards, Daniel T Humphrey, Martina Mueller, Shannon Phillips, Alyssa Schlenz, Morohuntodun O Oni, Julie Kanter, Kira Bona, Natasha M Archer","doi":"10.1002/pbc.32112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcranial doppler (TCD) screening identifies children ages 2-16 years with sickle cell disease (SCD) at an increased risk for stroke. Previous studies have shown that individuals from households on public insurance with limited neighborhood opportunity have increased barriers to receiving adequate healthcare; however, it is unknown whether low socioeconomic status (SES) influences TCD results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of the DISPLACE study data, which included children aged 2-6 years who had at least one TCD screen performed during their year of study enrollment, if space allowed. We utilized insurance type (public insurance vs. all other insurances) and overall childhood opportunity index (COI) group (Very Low vs. all other COI levels [Low, Medium, High, and Very High]) to proxy household- and neighborhood-level SES. We then examined the association between household- and neighborhood-level SES and conditional or abnormal TCD screening results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analytic cohort included 3124 children, with 1295 (41.5%) children living in Very Low COI neighborhoods and 2019 (64.6%) of households with public insurance. In the multinomial logistic regression model, only the lack of HU prescription remained significantly associated at p < 0.05 with abnormal TCD result (adjusted odds ratio = 19.01, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lack of hydroxyurea (HU) prescription was the factor most strongly associated with abnormal TCD outcome. Low SES proxies were not independently associated with abnormal or conditional TCD results. Qualitative studies are needed to better understand why a child with SCD might not have been prescribed HU.</p>","PeriodicalId":19822,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Blood & Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"e32112"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Blood & Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.32112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transcranial doppler (TCD) screening identifies children ages 2-16 years with sickle cell disease (SCD) at an increased risk for stroke. Previous studies have shown that individuals from households on public insurance with limited neighborhood opportunity have increased barriers to receiving adequate healthcare; however, it is unknown whether low socioeconomic status (SES) influences TCD results.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of the DISPLACE study data, which included children aged 2-6 years who had at least one TCD screen performed during their year of study enrollment, if space allowed. We utilized insurance type (public insurance vs. all other insurances) and overall childhood opportunity index (COI) group (Very Low vs. all other COI levels [Low, Medium, High, and Very High]) to proxy household- and neighborhood-level SES. We then examined the association between household- and neighborhood-level SES and conditional or abnormal TCD screening results.

Results: The analytic cohort included 3124 children, with 1295 (41.5%) children living in Very Low COI neighborhoods and 2019 (64.6%) of households with public insurance. In the multinomial logistic regression model, only the lack of HU prescription remained significantly associated at p < 0.05 with abnormal TCD result (adjusted odds ratio = 19.01, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Lack of hydroxyurea (HU) prescription was the factor most strongly associated with abnormal TCD outcome. Low SES proxies were not independently associated with abnormal or conditional TCD results. Qualitative studies are needed to better understand why a child with SCD might not have been prescribed HU.

儿童镰状细胞病的社会经济地位和卒中风险:一项置换研究的二次分析。
背景:经颅多普勒(TCD)筛查确定2-16岁儿童镰状细胞病(SCD)卒中风险增加。先前的研究表明,来自公共保险家庭的个人在社区机会有限的情况下,增加了获得适当医疗保健的障碍;然而,低社会经济地位(SES)是否影响TCD结果尚不清楚。方法:我们对DISPLACE研究数据进行了二次分析,其中包括2-6岁的儿童,如果空间允许,他们在研究入组期间至少进行了一次TCD筛查。我们使用保险类型(公共保险与所有其他保险)和总体童年机会指数(COI)组(非常低与所有其他COI水平[低,中,高和非常高])来代表家庭和社区水平的SES。然后,我们检查了家庭和社区水平SES与条件或异常TCD筛查结果之间的关系。结果:分析队列包括3124名儿童,其中1295名(41.5%)儿童生活在极低COI社区,2019名(64.6%)家庭有公共保险。结论:羟基脲(HU)处方缺乏是与TCD异常结局最密切相关的因素。低SES指标与异常或条件TCD结果没有独立关联。需要进行定性研究,以更好地理解为什么SCD患儿可能没有被处方HU。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Pediatric Blood & Cancer 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
546
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Pediatric Blood & Cancer publishes the highest quality manuscripts describing basic and clinical investigations of blood disorders and malignant diseases of childhood including diagnosis, treatment, epidemiology, etiology, biology, and molecular and clinical genetics of these diseases as they affect children, adolescents, and young adults. Pediatric Blood & Cancer will also include studies on such treatment options as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, immunology, and gene therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信