Eduardo Pérez, Samuel K Greer, Mary Van, Kenneth Skidmore, Kenroy Williams, Francis A Méndez Mediavilla
{"title":"Masking Mandate Policies and Community-Level Factors Associated with COVID-19 Cases Spread in the State of Texas.","authors":"Eduardo Pérez, Samuel K Greer, Mary Van, Kenneth Skidmore, Kenroy Williams, Francis A Méndez Mediavilla","doi":"10.1007/s40615-025-02688-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This exploratory study investigates the intersection of county demographics, healthcare disparities, and COVID-19 policies with COVID-19 outcomes in Texas. Using hierarchical clustering, random forest, and multinomial logistic regression algorithms, the study analyzes COVID-19 case data from March 4, 2020, to December 15, 2020, across 254 Texas counties. The findings reveal six distinct clusters, with key differentiating factors including the number of days under mask mandate, number of churches, population density, water area, and proportion of African American population. Longer mask mandates are associated with higher case rates, suggesting remedial rather than preventive implementation. Higher population density and more churches per person correlate with steeper case increases. Access to bodies of water and the proportion of the African American population were also associated with case trends. These insights helped us formulate hypotheses that can inform tailored public health interventions to address regional characteristics within Texas.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-025-02688-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This exploratory study investigates the intersection of county demographics, healthcare disparities, and COVID-19 policies with COVID-19 outcomes in Texas. Using hierarchical clustering, random forest, and multinomial logistic regression algorithms, the study analyzes COVID-19 case data from March 4, 2020, to December 15, 2020, across 254 Texas counties. The findings reveal six distinct clusters, with key differentiating factors including the number of days under mask mandate, number of churches, population density, water area, and proportion of African American population. Longer mask mandates are associated with higher case rates, suggesting remedial rather than preventive implementation. Higher population density and more churches per person correlate with steeper case increases. Access to bodies of water and the proportion of the African American population were also associated with case trends. These insights helped us formulate hypotheses that can inform tailored public health interventions to address regional characteristics within Texas.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.