Baseline CD4+/CD8+ TEMRA Levels and Early Response Predict Survival After Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Infusion in Acute GVHD Patients: A Randomized Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Multicentre Clinical Trial.

IF 2.1 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Journal of Blood Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JBM.S546632
Sze-Piaw Chin, Sen Mui Tan, Kian Meng Chang, S Fadilah Abdul Wahid, Azizan Sharif, Nik Syazana Izyan Saffery, Sharifah Shahnaz Syed Abd Kadir, Kim Wah Ho, Kong Yong Then, Soon Keng Cheong
{"title":"Baseline CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> T<sub>EMRA</sub> Levels and Early Response Predict Survival After Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Infusion in Acute GVHD Patients: A Randomized Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Multicentre Clinical Trial.","authors":"Sze-Piaw Chin, Sen Mui Tan, Kian Meng Chang, S Fadilah Abdul Wahid, Azizan Sharif, Nik Syazana Izyan Saffery, Sharifah Shahnaz Syed Abd Kadir, Kim Wah Ho, Kong Yong Then, Soon Keng Cheong","doi":"10.2147/JBM.S546632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A major challenge after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for haematologic malignancies is the management of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), which remains associated with poor prognosis despite therapeutic advancements. We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled Phase I/II clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (Cyto-MSC) as an upfront treatment in patients with grade II-IV aGVHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicentre trial, 22 grade II-IV aGVHD patients were randomized to receive up to three infusions of Cyto-MSC (n = 14) or placebo (n = 8), alongside standard corticosteroid therapy. The primary endpoints were overall response (OR) at Day 28 and overall survival (OS) at 12 months. The secondary endpoints included correlation between responses at Day 28 with 12-month OS and exploratory analyses of immune cell subsets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No treatment-related adverse events were observed. There were no significant differences between Cyto-MSC and placebo in the OR at Day 28 and 12-month OS. Among patients with severe grade III-IV aGVHD who achieved OR by Day 28, those treated with Cyto-MSC had significantly improved 12-month OS compared to placebo (100% vs 50%, <i>p</i>=0.039). Furthermore, in patients with severe aGVHD and baseline CD4<sup>+</sup> T<sub>EMRA</sub> >35% or CD8<sup>+</sup> T<sub>EMRA</sub> >70%, the survival benefit was pronounced in the Cyto-MSC group (83.3% and 100%, respectively). In contrast, none of the placebo-treated patients with baseline CD4<sup>+</sup> T<sub>EMRA</sub> <35% (<i>p</i>=0.007) or CD8<sup>+</sup> T<sub>EMRA</sub> <70% (<i>p</i>=0.005) survived at 12 months. OS was significantly associated with OR at Day 28 (<i>p</i><0.001), baseline CD4⁺ T<sub>EMRA</sub> (<i>p</i>=0.004), and baseline CD8⁺ T<sub>EMRA</sub> (<i>p</i>=0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with severe grade III-IV aGVHD, particularly those who respond early or have elevated baseline CD4<sup>+</sup> T<sub>EMRA</sub> (>35%) or CD8<sup>+</sup> T<sub>EMRA</sub> (>70%) levels, may have an overall survival advantage when treated with Cyto-MSC as an upfront therapy in combination with standard corticosteroids.</p>","PeriodicalId":15166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Blood Medicine","volume":"16 ","pages":"469-481"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12515453/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Blood Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S546632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A major challenge after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for haematologic malignancies is the management of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), which remains associated with poor prognosis despite therapeutic advancements. We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled Phase I/II clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (Cyto-MSC) as an upfront treatment in patients with grade II-IV aGVHD.

Methods: In this multicentre trial, 22 grade II-IV aGVHD patients were randomized to receive up to three infusions of Cyto-MSC (n = 14) or placebo (n = 8), alongside standard corticosteroid therapy. The primary endpoints were overall response (OR) at Day 28 and overall survival (OS) at 12 months. The secondary endpoints included correlation between responses at Day 28 with 12-month OS and exploratory analyses of immune cell subsets.

Results: No treatment-related adverse events were observed. There were no significant differences between Cyto-MSC and placebo in the OR at Day 28 and 12-month OS. Among patients with severe grade III-IV aGVHD who achieved OR by Day 28, those treated with Cyto-MSC had significantly improved 12-month OS compared to placebo (100% vs 50%, p=0.039). Furthermore, in patients with severe aGVHD and baseline CD4+ TEMRA >35% or CD8+ TEMRA >70%, the survival benefit was pronounced in the Cyto-MSC group (83.3% and 100%, respectively). In contrast, none of the placebo-treated patients with baseline CD4+ TEMRA <35% (p=0.007) or CD8+ TEMRA <70% (p=0.005) survived at 12 months. OS was significantly associated with OR at Day 28 (p<0.001), baseline CD4⁺ TEMRA (p=0.004), and baseline CD8⁺ TEMRA (p=0.004).

Conclusion: Patients with severe grade III-IV aGVHD, particularly those who respond early or have elevated baseline CD4+ TEMRA (>35%) or CD8+ TEMRA (>70%) levels, may have an overall survival advantage when treated with Cyto-MSC as an upfront therapy in combination with standard corticosteroids.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基线CD4+/CD8+ TEMRA水平和早期反应预测急性GVHD患者脐带来源间充质干细胞输注后的生存:一项随机双盲安慰剂对照多中心临床试验
背景:同种异体造血干细胞移植治疗恶性血液病后的主要挑战是急性移植物抗宿主病(aGVHD)的管理,尽管治疗进展,但仍与预后不良相关。我们进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的I/II期临床试验,以评估脐带源性间充质干细胞(cell - msc)作为II- iv级aGVHD患者前期治疗的安全性和有效性。方法:在这项多中心试验中,22名II-IV级aGVHD患者随机接受最多3次细胞间充质干细胞输注(n = 14)或安慰剂(n = 8),同时接受标准皮质类固醇治疗。主要终点是第28天的总缓解(OR)和12个月的总生存(OS)。次要终点包括第28天应答与12个月生存期的相关性以及免疫细胞亚群的探索性分析。结果:未观察到治疗相关不良事件。在第28天和第12个月的OS中,细胞间充质干细胞和安慰剂之间的OR没有显着差异。在第28天达到OR的严重III-IV级aGVHD患者中,与安慰剂相比,接受Cyto-MSC治疗的患者12个月的OS显着改善(100% vs 50%, p=0.039)。此外,在严重aGVHD和基线CD4+ TEMRA >35%或CD8+ TEMRA >70%的患者中,Cyto-MSC组的生存获益明显(分别为83.3%和100%)。相比之下,基线CD4+ TEMRA p=0.007)或CD8+ TEMRA p=0.005)的安慰剂治疗患者在12个月时均未存活。OS与第28天的OR (pEMRA (p=0.004))和基线CD8 + TEMRA (p=0.004)显著相关。结论:严重III-IV级aGVHD患者,特别是那些早期反应或基线CD4+ TEMRA(>35%)或CD8+ TEMRA(>70%)水平升高的患者,当将细胞间质干细胞作为前期治疗联合标准皮质类固醇治疗时,可能具有总体生存优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Blood Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal publishing laboratory, experimental and clinical aspects of all topics pertaining to blood based medicine including but not limited to: Transfusion Medicine (blood components, stem cell transplantation, apheresis, gene based therapeutics), Blood collection, Donor issues, Transmittable diseases, and Blood banking logistics, Immunohematology, Artificial and alternative blood based therapeutics, Hematology including disorders/pathology related to leukocytes/immunology, red cells, platelets and hemostasis, Biotechnology/nanotechnology of blood related medicine, Legal aspects of blood medicine, Historical perspectives. Original research, short reports, reviews, case reports and commentaries are invited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书