Sze-Piaw Chin, Sen Mui Tan, Kian Meng Chang, S Fadilah Abdul Wahid, Azizan Sharif, Nik Syazana Izyan Saffery, Sharifah Shahnaz Syed Abd Kadir, Kim Wah Ho, Kong Yong Then, Soon Keng Cheong
{"title":"Baseline CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> T<sub>EMRA</sub> Levels and Early Response Predict Survival After Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Infusion in Acute GVHD Patients: A Randomized Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Multicentre Clinical Trial.","authors":"Sze-Piaw Chin, Sen Mui Tan, Kian Meng Chang, S Fadilah Abdul Wahid, Azizan Sharif, Nik Syazana Izyan Saffery, Sharifah Shahnaz Syed Abd Kadir, Kim Wah Ho, Kong Yong Then, Soon Keng Cheong","doi":"10.2147/JBM.S546632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A major challenge after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for haematologic malignancies is the management of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), which remains associated with poor prognosis despite therapeutic advancements. We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled Phase I/II clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (Cyto-MSC) as an upfront treatment in patients with grade II-IV aGVHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicentre trial, 22 grade II-IV aGVHD patients were randomized to receive up to three infusions of Cyto-MSC (n = 14) or placebo (n = 8), alongside standard corticosteroid therapy. The primary endpoints were overall response (OR) at Day 28 and overall survival (OS) at 12 months. The secondary endpoints included correlation between responses at Day 28 with 12-month OS and exploratory analyses of immune cell subsets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No treatment-related adverse events were observed. There were no significant differences between Cyto-MSC and placebo in the OR at Day 28 and 12-month OS. Among patients with severe grade III-IV aGVHD who achieved OR by Day 28, those treated with Cyto-MSC had significantly improved 12-month OS compared to placebo (100% vs 50%, <i>p</i>=0.039). Furthermore, in patients with severe aGVHD and baseline CD4<sup>+</sup> T<sub>EMRA</sub> >35% or CD8<sup>+</sup> T<sub>EMRA</sub> >70%, the survival benefit was pronounced in the Cyto-MSC group (83.3% and 100%, respectively). In contrast, none of the placebo-treated patients with baseline CD4<sup>+</sup> T<sub>EMRA</sub> <35% (<i>p</i>=0.007) or CD8<sup>+</sup> T<sub>EMRA</sub> <70% (<i>p</i>=0.005) survived at 12 months. OS was significantly associated with OR at Day 28 (<i>p</i><0.001), baseline CD4⁺ T<sub>EMRA</sub> (<i>p</i>=0.004), and baseline CD8⁺ T<sub>EMRA</sub> (<i>p</i>=0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with severe grade III-IV aGVHD, particularly those who respond early or have elevated baseline CD4<sup>+</sup> T<sub>EMRA</sub> (>35%) or CD8<sup>+</sup> T<sub>EMRA</sub> (>70%) levels, may have an overall survival advantage when treated with Cyto-MSC as an upfront therapy in combination with standard corticosteroids.</p>","PeriodicalId":15166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Blood Medicine","volume":"16 ","pages":"469-481"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12515453/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Blood Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S546632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: A major challenge after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for haematologic malignancies is the management of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), which remains associated with poor prognosis despite therapeutic advancements. We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled Phase I/II clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (Cyto-MSC) as an upfront treatment in patients with grade II-IV aGVHD.
Methods: In this multicentre trial, 22 grade II-IV aGVHD patients were randomized to receive up to three infusions of Cyto-MSC (n = 14) or placebo (n = 8), alongside standard corticosteroid therapy. The primary endpoints were overall response (OR) at Day 28 and overall survival (OS) at 12 months. The secondary endpoints included correlation between responses at Day 28 with 12-month OS and exploratory analyses of immune cell subsets.
Results: No treatment-related adverse events were observed. There were no significant differences between Cyto-MSC and placebo in the OR at Day 28 and 12-month OS. Among patients with severe grade III-IV aGVHD who achieved OR by Day 28, those treated with Cyto-MSC had significantly improved 12-month OS compared to placebo (100% vs 50%, p=0.039). Furthermore, in patients with severe aGVHD and baseline CD4+ TEMRA >35% or CD8+ TEMRA >70%, the survival benefit was pronounced in the Cyto-MSC group (83.3% and 100%, respectively). In contrast, none of the placebo-treated patients with baseline CD4+ TEMRA <35% (p=0.007) or CD8+ TEMRA <70% (p=0.005) survived at 12 months. OS was significantly associated with OR at Day 28 (p<0.001), baseline CD4⁺ TEMRA (p=0.004), and baseline CD8⁺ TEMRA (p=0.004).
Conclusion: Patients with severe grade III-IV aGVHD, particularly those who respond early or have elevated baseline CD4+ TEMRA (>35%) or CD8+ TEMRA (>70%) levels, may have an overall survival advantage when treated with Cyto-MSC as an upfront therapy in combination with standard corticosteroids.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Blood Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal publishing laboratory, experimental and clinical aspects of all topics pertaining to blood based medicine including but not limited to: Transfusion Medicine (blood components, stem cell transplantation, apheresis, gene based therapeutics), Blood collection, Donor issues, Transmittable diseases, and Blood banking logistics, Immunohematology, Artificial and alternative blood based therapeutics, Hematology including disorders/pathology related to leukocytes/immunology, red cells, platelets and hemostasis, Biotechnology/nanotechnology of blood related medicine, Legal aspects of blood medicine, Historical perspectives. Original research, short reports, reviews, case reports and commentaries are invited.