Custom-made acetabular implants for revision total hip arthroplasty: postoperative evaluation of the accuracy of implant positioning.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Benjamin Schlossmacher, Igor Lazic, Christian Suren, Rainer Burgkart, Florian Pohlig, Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe, Peter M Prodinger
{"title":"Custom-made acetabular implants for revision total hip arthroplasty: postoperative evaluation of the accuracy of implant positioning.","authors":"Benjamin Schlossmacher, Igor Lazic, Christian Suren, Rainer Burgkart, Florian Pohlig, Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe, Peter M Prodinger","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-09250-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing need for revision total hip arthroplasty due to complications such as bone defects following implant loosening has - among others - led to the development of custom-made acetabular implants. This study evaluated the accuracy of implant positioning measured on AP radiographs and the respective clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 31 cases involving severe acetabular bone loss (Paprosky type IIIa/ IIIb) was conducted. Preoperative planning was based on CT scans, and postoperative evaluation was performed via AP radiographs, focusing on Lewinnek's safe zone for anteversion (AV) and inclination (INCL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that 87.1% of the implants were positioned within or on the border of Lewinnek's safe zone for AV and INCL. Mean AV (SD) was 13.9° (8.7°), mean INCL (SD) 46.9° (6.1°). Mean deviations between planning and postoperative results were 7.4° for AV (SD) (5.5°; p = 0.704) and 3.7° for INCL (SD) (5.2°; p = 0.068). Implant survival was 96.7% over a median follow-up (IQR) of 43.0 months (65.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Correct positioning of customized acetabular implants could be achieved via assessment on plain AP radiographs using a superimposition method. The results were further emphasized by the low rate of mechanical complications and high implant survival. Lewinnek's safe zone is a good guideline for proper cup positioning but should not be prioritized over primary stability of the implant. Accurate planning is key to achieving both a satisfying position and sufficient osseous integration. Further research involving higher case numbers through a multi-center approach is needed to draw definitive conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"952"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-09250-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The increasing need for revision total hip arthroplasty due to complications such as bone defects following implant loosening has - among others - led to the development of custom-made acetabular implants. This study evaluated the accuracy of implant positioning measured on AP radiographs and the respective clinical outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 31 cases involving severe acetabular bone loss (Paprosky type IIIa/ IIIb) was conducted. Preoperative planning was based on CT scans, and postoperative evaluation was performed via AP radiographs, focusing on Lewinnek's safe zone for anteversion (AV) and inclination (INCL).

Results: Results showed that 87.1% of the implants were positioned within or on the border of Lewinnek's safe zone for AV and INCL. Mean AV (SD) was 13.9° (8.7°), mean INCL (SD) 46.9° (6.1°). Mean deviations between planning and postoperative results were 7.4° for AV (SD) (5.5°; p = 0.704) and 3.7° for INCL (SD) (5.2°; p = 0.068). Implant survival was 96.7% over a median follow-up (IQR) of 43.0 months (65.0).

Conclusions: Correct positioning of customized acetabular implants could be achieved via assessment on plain AP radiographs using a superimposition method. The results were further emphasized by the low rate of mechanical complications and high implant survival. Lewinnek's safe zone is a good guideline for proper cup positioning but should not be prioritized over primary stability of the implant. Accurate planning is key to achieving both a satisfying position and sufficient osseous integration. Further research involving higher case numbers through a multi-center approach is needed to draw definitive conclusions.

定制髋臼假体用于翻修全髋关节置换术:假体定位准确性的术后评估。
背景:由于假体松动后的骨缺损等并发症,对翻修全髋关节置换术的需求日益增加,这导致了定制髋臼假体的发展。本研究评估了AP x线片测量的种植体定位的准确性和相应的临床结果。方法:对31例重度髋臼骨丢失(papprosky型IIIa/ IIIb)患者进行回顾性分析。术前计划基于CT扫描,术后通过AP片进行评估,重点是前倾(AV)和倾斜(INCL)的Lewinnek安全区域。结果:87.1%的种植体位于Lewinnek安全区内或Lewinnek安全区内,平均AV (SD)为13.9°(8.7°),平均INCL (SD)为46.9°(6.1°)。计划与术后结果的平均偏差AV (SD)为7.4°(5.5°,p = 0.704), INCL (SD)为3.7°(5.2°,p = 0.068)。中位随访(IQR)为43.0个月(65.0个月),种植体存活率为96.7%。结论:采用叠加法对AP平片进行评估,可实现定制髋臼植入物的正确定位。机械并发症发生率低,种植体成活率高。Lewinnek安全区域是正确定位假杯的良好指导,但不应优先考虑假体的基本稳定性。准确的规划是实现满意位置和充分骨整合的关键。需要通过多中心方法进行涉及更高病例数的进一步研究,以得出明确的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信