Long-Term Outcomes After Fontan Conversion Operation: A Comparative Analysis Based on Type of Fontan Connection.

IF 8.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Amr Moustafa, Zeyad Kholeif, William R Miranda, Heidi M Connolly, Elizabeth H Stephens, Joseph A Dearani, Alexander C Egbe
{"title":"Long-Term Outcomes After Fontan Conversion Operation: A Comparative Analysis Based on Type of Fontan Connection.","authors":"Amr Moustafa, Zeyad Kholeif, William R Miranda, Heidi M Connolly, Elizabeth H Stephens, Joseph A Dearani, Alexander C Egbe","doi":"10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.125.012990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fontan conversion (FC) is associated with a lower risk of atrial arrhythmias and thromboembolism, but it is unknown whether FC improves long-term survival. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of FC on transplant-free survival.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Adults with Fontan palliation were divided into 3 groups: (1) atriopulmonary Fontan connection; (2) atriopulmonary Fontan and subsequent FC to total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC); (3) TCPC at initial Fontan operation. The risk of death/transplant was compared between the 3 groups using Cox regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 534 patients (age 27±9 years; males [N=298; 56%]). Patients were divided into atriopulmonary Fontan group (N=199, 37%); FC-TCPC (N=138, 26%); and TCPC (N=197, 37%). The FC-TCPC and TCPC groups have similar 15-year incidence of death/transplant (42% versus 47%; <i>P</i>=0.8), even after excluding the 8% operative mortality in the FC-TCPC group (38% versus 47%; <i>P</i>=0.3). On multivariable analyses, neither FC nor the type of Fontan connection was associated with death/transplant. Rather, the risk factors for death/transplant were older age, hepatorenal dysfunction, heart failure, and higher Fontan pressures. The prevalence and severity of these comorbidities increased with age, suggesting that these factors reflect the duration of Fontan physiology, rather than the type of Fontan connection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings, in addition to the high operative mortality associated with FC, suggest that this may not be the optimal treatment option for most adults with atriopulmonary Fontan presenting with Fontan failure. Duration of Fontan physiology rather than the type of Fontan connection may be the main determinant of outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10196,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":"e012990"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.125.012990","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fontan conversion (FC) is associated with a lower risk of atrial arrhythmias and thromboembolism, but it is unknown whether FC improves long-term survival. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of FC on transplant-free survival.

Method: Adults with Fontan palliation were divided into 3 groups: (1) atriopulmonary Fontan connection; (2) atriopulmonary Fontan and subsequent FC to total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC); (3) TCPC at initial Fontan operation. The risk of death/transplant was compared between the 3 groups using Cox regression analysis.

Results: We studied 534 patients (age 27±9 years; males [N=298; 56%]). Patients were divided into atriopulmonary Fontan group (N=199, 37%); FC-TCPC (N=138, 26%); and TCPC (N=197, 37%). The FC-TCPC and TCPC groups have similar 15-year incidence of death/transplant (42% versus 47%; P=0.8), even after excluding the 8% operative mortality in the FC-TCPC group (38% versus 47%; P=0.3). On multivariable analyses, neither FC nor the type of Fontan connection was associated with death/transplant. Rather, the risk factors for death/transplant were older age, hepatorenal dysfunction, heart failure, and higher Fontan pressures. The prevalence and severity of these comorbidities increased with age, suggesting that these factors reflect the duration of Fontan physiology, rather than the type of Fontan connection.

Conclusions: These findings, in addition to the high operative mortality associated with FC, suggest that this may not be the optimal treatment option for most adults with atriopulmonary Fontan presenting with Fontan failure. Duration of Fontan physiology rather than the type of Fontan connection may be the main determinant of outcomes.

Fontan转换术后远期疗效:基于Fontan连接方式的比较分析。
背景:Fontan转换(FC)与较低的心房心律失常和血栓栓塞风险相关,但FC是否能改善长期生存尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估FC对无移植生存的影响。方法:将行Fontan姑息治疗的成人分为3组:(1)心房肺Fontan连接;(2)心房肺Fontan和随后的FC到全腔肺连接(TCPC);(3)丰滩初期的TCPC。采用Cox回归分析比较3组患者的死亡/移植风险。结果:我们研究了534例患者(年龄27±9岁;男性[N=298; 56%])。患者分为心房肺Fontan组(N=199,占37%);Fc-tcpc (n =138, 26%);TCPC (N=197, 37%)。FC-TCPC组和TCPC组的15年死亡/移植发生率相似(42%对47%,P=0.8),即使排除FC-TCPC组8%的手术死亡率(38%对47%,P=0.3)。在多变量分析中,FC和Fontan连接类型都与死亡/移植无关。相反,死亡/移植的危险因素是年龄较大、肝肾功能障碍、心力衰竭和较高的方丹压。这些合并症的患病率和严重程度随着年龄的增长而增加,这表明这些因素反映了Fontan生理的持续时间,而不是Fontan连接的类型。结论:这些发现,加上与FC相关的高手术死亡率,表明这可能不是大多数心房肺Fontan患者以Fontan失败为表现的最佳治疗选择。Fontan生理学的持续时间而不是Fontan连接的类型可能是结果的主要决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation: Heart Failure
Circulation: Heart Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
271
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Heart Failure focuses on content related to heart failure, mechanical circulatory support, and heart transplant science and medicine. It considers studies conducted in humans or analyses of human data, as well as preclinical studies with direct clinical correlation or relevance. While primarily a clinical journal, it may publish novel basic and preclinical studies that significantly advance the field of heart failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信