The Survival for Pneumonectomy After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study from the National Cancer Center in China.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Sikai Wu, Xiaowei Chen, Bo Zhang, Ershu Bo, Haixiao Diao, Jianfei Shen, Zimin Wang, Yang Liu, William C Cho, Zhenlin Yang, Shugeng Gao
{"title":"The Survival for Pneumonectomy After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study from the National Cancer Center in China.","authors":"Sikai Wu, Xiaowei Chen, Bo Zhang, Ershu Bo, Haixiao Diao, Jianfei Shen, Zimin Wang, Yang Liu, William C Cho, Zhenlin Yang, Shugeng Gao","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-18436-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of pneumonectomy after neoadjuvant therapy by assessing postoperative outcomes, survival prognosis, and recurrence patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent pneumonectomy between January 2017 and December 2022 was performed. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received neoadjuvant therapy, resulting in the neoadjuvant therapy group and the non-neoadjuvant therapy group. Propensity score-matching was performed to balance the cohorts. Perioperative outcomes, survival outcomes, and recurrence patterns were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The entire cohort comprised 455 patients. Using a 2:1 propensity score-matching method, 229 patients in the non-neoadjuvant therapy group and 137 patients in the neoadjuvant therapy group were enrolled in the subsequent analysis. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) stay, open thoracotomy, operation time, intraoperative blood transfusion, and postoperative hospital stay were risk factors for postoperative complications. The neoadjuvant therapy group had a longer postoperative ICU stay (6.1% vs 12.4%; P = 0.036). However, postoperative morbidity did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.134). The pathologic complete response rate for the patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy was significantly higher than for those receiving chemotherapy alone. Subgroup analyses indicated that only neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy significantly improved overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.34; range, 0.14-0.85; P = 0.020).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study confirmed that neoadjuvant therapy was safe and effective for patients with pneumonectomy, and that neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy had a favorable impact on patient prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-18436-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of pneumonectomy after neoadjuvant therapy by assessing postoperative outcomes, survival prognosis, and recurrence patterns.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent pneumonectomy between January 2017 and December 2022 was performed. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received neoadjuvant therapy, resulting in the neoadjuvant therapy group and the non-neoadjuvant therapy group. Propensity score-matching was performed to balance the cohorts. Perioperative outcomes, survival outcomes, and recurrence patterns were compared between the two groups.

Results: The entire cohort comprised 455 patients. Using a 2:1 propensity score-matching method, 229 patients in the non-neoadjuvant therapy group and 137 patients in the neoadjuvant therapy group were enrolled in the subsequent analysis. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) stay, open thoracotomy, operation time, intraoperative blood transfusion, and postoperative hospital stay were risk factors for postoperative complications. The neoadjuvant therapy group had a longer postoperative ICU stay (6.1% vs 12.4%; P = 0.036). However, postoperative morbidity did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.134). The pathologic complete response rate for the patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy was significantly higher than for those receiving chemotherapy alone. Subgroup analyses indicated that only neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy significantly improved overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.34; range, 0.14-0.85; P = 0.020).

Conclusion: The study confirmed that neoadjuvant therapy was safe and effective for patients with pneumonectomy, and that neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy had a favorable impact on patient prognosis.

非小细胞肺癌肺切除术后新辅助治疗的生存率:中国国家癌症中心的回顾性研究。
背景:本研究旨在通过评估术后预后、生存预后和复发模式来评估全肺切除术对新辅助治疗的影响。方法:回顾性分析2017年1月至2022年12月间行全肺切除术的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者。根据患者是否接受新辅助治疗分为两组,分为新辅助治疗组和非新辅助治疗组。进行倾向评分匹配以平衡队列。比较两组患者的围手术期结局、生存结局和复发情况。结果:整个队列包括455名患者。采用2:1倾向评分匹配法,非新辅助治疗组229例,新辅助治疗组137例纳入后续分析。单因素logistic回归分析显示,术后重症监护病房(ICU)入住时间、开胸时间、手术时间、术中输血时间、术后住院时间是发生术后并发症的危险因素。新辅助治疗组术后ICU住院时间较长(6.1% vs 12.4%; P = 0.036)。两组术后发病率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.134)。接受化学免疫治疗的患者病理完全缓解率明显高于单独接受化疗的患者。亚组分析显示,只有新辅助化疗免疫治疗能显著提高总生存率(风险比[HR], 0.34;范围,0.14-0.85;P = 0.020)。结论:本研究证实新辅助治疗对全肺切除术患者安全有效,新辅助化疗免疫治疗对患者预后有良好影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信