How Population Structure and Nest Membership Shape Pathogen Patterns in Bumble Bees.

IF 3.9 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Jana Dobelmann, Lena Wilfert
{"title":"How Population Structure and Nest Membership Shape Pathogen Patterns in Bumble Bees.","authors":"Jana Dobelmann, Lena Wilfert","doi":"10.1111/mec.70146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Host density, genetic diversity and social groups are key factors influencing pathogen transmission in wildlife populations, but their interactions remain poorly understood in insects. Islands can provide natural laboratories with distinct populations that vary in density and genetic diversity, whereby dense, genetically homogeneous populations are expected to facilitate pathogen transmission. We used bumble bees to test these predictions, assessing the population structure of the two common species Bombus pascuorum and B. terrestris across island and mainland sites in the British Isles and France and testing bees for five micro-parasitic and four viral pathogens. B. pascuorum formed distinct genetic clusters on islands, with varying levels of heterozygosity and only the Isle of Arran clustered with mainland populations. B. terrestris populations were less structured, but populations on the Isle of Man and the Scilly Isles were genetically separated from other island and mainland populations while showing low heterozygosity. Colony density was similar between species and not linked to genetic diversity but had a positive effect on the prevalence of some pathogens. Contrary to expectations, there was no protective effect of high genetic diversity, suggesting that generalist bumble bee pathogens could be more affected by host species diversity and density. Yet, within B. terrestris populations, we found that nestmates showed more similar pathogen profiles than unrelated individuals, suggesting that genetic similarity and high contact rates within nests affect pathogen prevalence in wild bees.</p>","PeriodicalId":210,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Ecology","volume":" ","pages":"e70146"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.70146","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Host density, genetic diversity and social groups are key factors influencing pathogen transmission in wildlife populations, but their interactions remain poorly understood in insects. Islands can provide natural laboratories with distinct populations that vary in density and genetic diversity, whereby dense, genetically homogeneous populations are expected to facilitate pathogen transmission. We used bumble bees to test these predictions, assessing the population structure of the two common species Bombus pascuorum and B. terrestris across island and mainland sites in the British Isles and France and testing bees for five micro-parasitic and four viral pathogens. B. pascuorum formed distinct genetic clusters on islands, with varying levels of heterozygosity and only the Isle of Arran clustered with mainland populations. B. terrestris populations were less structured, but populations on the Isle of Man and the Scilly Isles were genetically separated from other island and mainland populations while showing low heterozygosity. Colony density was similar between species and not linked to genetic diversity but had a positive effect on the prevalence of some pathogens. Contrary to expectations, there was no protective effect of high genetic diversity, suggesting that generalist bumble bee pathogens could be more affected by host species diversity and density. Yet, within B. terrestris populations, we found that nestmates showed more similar pathogen profiles than unrelated individuals, suggesting that genetic similarity and high contact rates within nests affect pathogen prevalence in wild bees.

种群结构和巢成员如何影响大黄蜂的病原体模式。
寄主密度、遗传多样性和社会群体是影响病原菌在野生动物种群中传播的关键因素,但它们在昆虫种群中的相互作用尚不清楚。岛屿可以为自然实验室提供密度和遗传多样性各不相同的独特种群,因此,密集的、遗传同质的种群预计会促进病原体的传播。我们用大黄蜂来测试这些预测,评估了两种常见物种的种群结构,在不列颠群岛和法国的岛屿和大陆地区,对蜜蜂进行了五种微寄生虫和四种病毒病原体的测试。在岛屿上形成了不同的遗传集群,杂合度不同,只有阿兰岛与大陆种群聚集。B. terrestris种群结构较差,但马恩岛和锡利群岛的种群在遗传上与其他岛屿和大陆种群分离,杂合性较低。菌落密度在物种之间相似,与遗传多样性无关,但对某些病原体的流行有积极影响。与预期相反,高遗传多样性没有保护作用,这表明多面手大黄蜂病原体可能更多地受到宿主物种多样性和密度的影响。然而,在陆地蜜蜂种群中,我们发现与不相关的个体相比,巢内配偶表现出更多相似的病原体特征,这表明遗传相似性和巢内的高接触率影响了野生蜜蜂的病原体流行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Ecology
Molecular Ecology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.20%
发文量
472
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Ecology publishes papers that utilize molecular genetic techniques to address consequential questions in ecology, evolution, behaviour and conservation. Studies may employ neutral markers for inference about ecological and evolutionary processes or examine ecologically important genes and their products directly. We discourage papers that are primarily descriptive and are relevant only to the taxon being studied. Papers reporting on molecular marker development, molecular diagnostics, barcoding, or DNA taxonomy, or technical methods should be re-directed to our sister journal, Molecular Ecology Resources. Likewise, papers with a strongly applied focus should be submitted to Evolutionary Applications. Research areas of interest to Molecular Ecology include: * population structure and phylogeography * reproductive strategies * relatedness and kin selection * sex allocation * population genetic theory * analytical methods development * conservation genetics * speciation genetics * microbial biodiversity * evolutionary dynamics of QTLs * ecological interactions * molecular adaptation and environmental genomics * impact of genetically modified organisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信