Guadalupe Alvarez Rodriguez, Paul Tregoning, Rebecca McGirr
{"title":"A Tool to Assess the Accuracy of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment Predictions of Present-Day Crustal Uplift Rates","authors":"Guadalupe Alvarez Rodriguez, Paul Tregoning, Rebecca McGirr","doi":"10.1029/2025GL116421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ongoing glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) is detectable in geodetic height time series and changes in the temporal gravity field. Global GIA models are often used to remove these signals from data but quantifying the errors in such models is difficult due to insufficient knowledge of Earth rheology and past ice history. Here we describe how estimates of Earth's temporal gravity field and observed height time series can be used to quantify errors in GIA models. We tested several GIA models in Fennoscandia, Laurentia and Greenland and found spatial coherence in the pattern of errors, with root mean square velocity errors of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>∼</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\sim} $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>1 mm/yr, <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>∼</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\sim} $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>2 mm/yr and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>∼</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\sim} $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>5 mm/yr, respectively. Surprisingly, there are substantial similarities in the errors of the models tested. Our diagnostic tool can be used to identify regions where ice histories and/or Earth rheology parameters are deficient in the GIA models.</p>","PeriodicalId":12523,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Research Letters","volume":"52 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025GL116421","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025GL116421","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ongoing glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) is detectable in geodetic height time series and changes in the temporal gravity field. Global GIA models are often used to remove these signals from data but quantifying the errors in such models is difficult due to insufficient knowledge of Earth rheology and past ice history. Here we describe how estimates of Earth's temporal gravity field and observed height time series can be used to quantify errors in GIA models. We tested several GIA models in Fennoscandia, Laurentia and Greenland and found spatial coherence in the pattern of errors, with root mean square velocity errors of 1 mm/yr, 2 mm/yr and 5 mm/yr, respectively. Surprisingly, there are substantial similarities in the errors of the models tested. Our diagnostic tool can be used to identify regions where ice histories and/or Earth rheology parameters are deficient in the GIA models.
期刊介绍:
Geophysical Research Letters (GRL) publishes high-impact, innovative, and timely research on major scientific advances in all the major geoscience disciplines. Papers are communications-length articles and should have broad and immediate implications in their discipline or across the geosciences. GRLmaintains the fastest turn-around of all high-impact publications in the geosciences and works closely with authors to ensure broad visibility of top papers.