A Tool to Assess the Accuracy of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment Predictions of Present-Day Crustal Uplift Rates

IF 4.6 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Guadalupe Alvarez Rodriguez, Paul Tregoning, Rebecca McGirr
{"title":"A Tool to Assess the Accuracy of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment Predictions of Present-Day Crustal Uplift Rates","authors":"Guadalupe Alvarez Rodriguez,&nbsp;Paul Tregoning,&nbsp;Rebecca McGirr","doi":"10.1029/2025GL116421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ongoing glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) is detectable in geodetic height time series and changes in the temporal gravity field. Global GIA models are often used to remove these signals from data but quantifying the errors in such models is difficult due to insufficient knowledge of Earth rheology and past ice history. Here we describe how estimates of Earth's temporal gravity field and observed height time series can be used to quantify errors in GIA models. We tested several GIA models in Fennoscandia, Laurentia and Greenland and found spatial coherence in the pattern of errors, with root mean square velocity errors of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>∼</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\sim} $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>1 mm/yr, <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>∼</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\sim} $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>2 mm/yr and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>∼</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\sim} $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>5 mm/yr, respectively. Surprisingly, there are substantial similarities in the errors of the models tested. Our diagnostic tool can be used to identify regions where ice histories and/or Earth rheology parameters are deficient in the GIA models.</p>","PeriodicalId":12523,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Research Letters","volume":"52 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025GL116421","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025GL116421","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ongoing glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) is detectable in geodetic height time series and changes in the temporal gravity field. Global GIA models are often used to remove these signals from data but quantifying the errors in such models is difficult due to insufficient knowledge of Earth rheology and past ice history. Here we describe how estimates of Earth's temporal gravity field and observed height time series can be used to quantify errors in GIA models. We tested several GIA models in Fennoscandia, Laurentia and Greenland and found spatial coherence in the pattern of errors, with root mean square velocity errors of ${\sim} $ 1 mm/yr, ${\sim} $ 2 mm/yr and ${\sim} $ 5 mm/yr, respectively. Surprisingly, there are substantial similarities in the errors of the models tested. Our diagnostic tool can be used to identify regions where ice histories and/or Earth rheology parameters are deficient in the GIA models.

Abstract Image

评估现今地壳隆升速率的冰川均衡调整预测准确性的工具
正在进行的冰川均衡调整(GIA)在大地高度时间序列和时间重力场变化中可以检测到。全球GIA模型通常用于从数据中去除这些信号,但由于对地球流变学和过去冰史的了解不足,很难量化这种模型中的误差。在这里,我们描述了如何估计地球的时间重力场和观测高度时间序列可以用来量化误差的GIA模型。我们在芬诺斯坎迪亚、劳伦西亚和格陵兰岛测试了几种GIA模型,发现误差模式具有空间一致性,均方根速度误差为~ ${\sim} $ 1 mm/年,~ ${\sim} $ 200万/年和~ ${\sim} $ 500万/年。令人惊讶的是,所测试的模型的误差有很大的相似之处。我们的诊断工具可用于识别GIA模型中冰史和/或地球流变参数不足的地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geophysical Research Letters
Geophysical Research Letters 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
1588
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Geophysical Research Letters (GRL) publishes high-impact, innovative, and timely research on major scientific advances in all the major geoscience disciplines. Papers are communications-length articles and should have broad and immediate implications in their discipline or across the geosciences. GRLmaintains the fastest turn-around of all high-impact publications in the geosciences and works closely with authors to ensure broad visibility of top papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信