Prognostic Accuracy of BPD Definitions for Long-Term Outcomes in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review.

IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Trixie A Katz,Rosemarie de Ridder,Eduardo Bancalari,Rosemary D Higgins,Tetsuya Isayama,Erik A Jensen,Martin Offringa,J Jane Pillow,Prakesh S Shah,Roger F Soll,Benjamin Stoecklin,Joost G Daams,Anton H van Kaam,Wes Onland,Suzanne M Mugie
{"title":"Prognostic Accuracy of BPD Definitions for Long-Term Outcomes in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Trixie A Katz,Rosemarie de Ridder,Eduardo Bancalari,Rosemary D Higgins,Tetsuya Isayama,Erik A Jensen,Martin Offringa,J Jane Pillow,Prakesh S Shah,Roger F Soll,Benjamin Stoecklin,Joost G Daams,Anton H van Kaam,Wes Onland,Suzanne M Mugie","doi":"10.1542/peds.2025-070741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES\r\nSince the first description of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), multiple definitions to diagnose BPD and its grading have been published. Several studies have compared the predictive performance of these definitions for long-term outcomes. The objective was to identify the BPD definition with the optimal predictive performance for long-term respiratory and neurological outcomes in preterm infants.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nAn electronic search identified studies in Medline and Embase from inception to August 2024. Studies assessing the performance of one or more BPD definitions for predicting long-term respiratory and/or neurological outcomes were included. We used the Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool for bias assessment. Reported prognostic accuracy of 5 BPD definitions (the 1988 Shennan, the 2001 National Institutes of Health [NIH], the 2017 Canadian Neonatal Network, the 2018 NIH, and the 2019 Neonatal Research Network definition) was tabulated using specificity, sensitivity, C statistic, risk, or odds ratio.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf the 6045 identified studies, 18 were included. Heterogeneity between studies resulted in inconsistent prognostic accuracy for long-term outcomes. The 2001 NIH definition showed higher prognostic accuracy for respiratory and neurological outcomes compared with the 1988 Shennan BPD definition. Only 5 studies showed a low to moderate risk of bias, and a sensitivity analysis confirmed the results. The limitations included challenges in comparing studies due to population heterogeneity and outcome definitions.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis systematic review shows that comparisons between the 2001 NIH definition and newer BPD definitions yield inconsistent results for predicting long-term outcomes. None of the current BPD definitions consistently provided sufficient prognostic accuracy for long-term respiratory and neurodevelopmental sequelae in very preterm infants.","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":"213 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2025-070741","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Since the first description of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), multiple definitions to diagnose BPD and its grading have been published. Several studies have compared the predictive performance of these definitions for long-term outcomes. The objective was to identify the BPD definition with the optimal predictive performance for long-term respiratory and neurological outcomes in preterm infants. METHODS An electronic search identified studies in Medline and Embase from inception to August 2024. Studies assessing the performance of one or more BPD definitions for predicting long-term respiratory and/or neurological outcomes were included. We used the Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool for bias assessment. Reported prognostic accuracy of 5 BPD definitions (the 1988 Shennan, the 2001 National Institutes of Health [NIH], the 2017 Canadian Neonatal Network, the 2018 NIH, and the 2019 Neonatal Research Network definition) was tabulated using specificity, sensitivity, C statistic, risk, or odds ratio. RESULTS Of the 6045 identified studies, 18 were included. Heterogeneity between studies resulted in inconsistent prognostic accuracy for long-term outcomes. The 2001 NIH definition showed higher prognostic accuracy for respiratory and neurological outcomes compared with the 1988 Shennan BPD definition. Only 5 studies showed a low to moderate risk of bias, and a sensitivity analysis confirmed the results. The limitations included challenges in comparing studies due to population heterogeneity and outcome definitions. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review shows that comparisons between the 2001 NIH definition and newer BPD definitions yield inconsistent results for predicting long-term outcomes. None of the current BPD definitions consistently provided sufficient prognostic accuracy for long-term respiratory and neurodevelopmental sequelae in very preterm infants.
BPD定义对早产儿长期预后的预测准确性:一项系统综述。
背景与目的自首次描述支气管肺发育不良(BPD)以来,已经发表了多种诊断BPD及其分级的定义。一些研究比较了这些定义对长期结果的预测性能。目的是确定BPD定义与早产儿长期呼吸和神经预后的最佳预测性能。方法通过电子检索检索Medline和Embase从成立到2024年8月的研究。研究评估了一种或多种BPD定义在预测长期呼吸和/或神经预后方面的表现。我们使用预后研究质量(QUIPS)工具进行偏倚评估。已报道的5种BPD定义(1988年深南定义、2001年美国国立卫生研究院定义、2017年加拿大新生儿网络定义、2018年美国国立卫生研究院定义和2019年新生儿研究网络定义)的预后准确性采用特异性、敏感性、C统计量、风险或优势比制成表格。结果在6045项研究中,有18项被纳入。研究之间的异质性导致长期预后准确性不一致。与1988年的深南BPD定义相比,2001年的NIH定义显示呼吸和神经预后的准确性更高。只有5项研究显示低至中等偏倚风险,敏感性分析证实了结果。局限性包括由于人口异质性和结果定义而在比较研究方面存在挑战。本系统综述显示,2001年NIH定义与较新的BPD定义之间的比较在预测长期预后方面产生了不一致的结果。目前没有一种BPD定义一致地为极早产儿的长期呼吸和神经发育后遗症提供足够的预后准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatrics
Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
791
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field. The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability. Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights. As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信