Trixie A Katz,Rosemarie de Ridder,Eduardo Bancalari,Rosemary D Higgins,Tetsuya Isayama,Erik A Jensen,Martin Offringa,J Jane Pillow,Prakesh S Shah,Roger F Soll,Benjamin Stoecklin,Joost G Daams,Anton H van Kaam,Wes Onland,Suzanne M Mugie
{"title":"Prognostic Accuracy of BPD Definitions for Long-Term Outcomes in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Trixie A Katz,Rosemarie de Ridder,Eduardo Bancalari,Rosemary D Higgins,Tetsuya Isayama,Erik A Jensen,Martin Offringa,J Jane Pillow,Prakesh S Shah,Roger F Soll,Benjamin Stoecklin,Joost G Daams,Anton H van Kaam,Wes Onland,Suzanne M Mugie","doi":"10.1542/peds.2025-070741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES\r\nSince the first description of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), multiple definitions to diagnose BPD and its grading have been published. Several studies have compared the predictive performance of these definitions for long-term outcomes. The objective was to identify the BPD definition with the optimal predictive performance for long-term respiratory and neurological outcomes in preterm infants.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nAn electronic search identified studies in Medline and Embase from inception to August 2024. Studies assessing the performance of one or more BPD definitions for predicting long-term respiratory and/or neurological outcomes were included. We used the Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool for bias assessment. Reported prognostic accuracy of 5 BPD definitions (the 1988 Shennan, the 2001 National Institutes of Health [NIH], the 2017 Canadian Neonatal Network, the 2018 NIH, and the 2019 Neonatal Research Network definition) was tabulated using specificity, sensitivity, C statistic, risk, or odds ratio.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf the 6045 identified studies, 18 were included. Heterogeneity between studies resulted in inconsistent prognostic accuracy for long-term outcomes. The 2001 NIH definition showed higher prognostic accuracy for respiratory and neurological outcomes compared with the 1988 Shennan BPD definition. Only 5 studies showed a low to moderate risk of bias, and a sensitivity analysis confirmed the results. The limitations included challenges in comparing studies due to population heterogeneity and outcome definitions.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis systematic review shows that comparisons between the 2001 NIH definition and newer BPD definitions yield inconsistent results for predicting long-term outcomes. None of the current BPD definitions consistently provided sufficient prognostic accuracy for long-term respiratory and neurodevelopmental sequelae in very preterm infants.","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":"213 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2025-070741","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Since the first description of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), multiple definitions to diagnose BPD and its grading have been published. Several studies have compared the predictive performance of these definitions for long-term outcomes. The objective was to identify the BPD definition with the optimal predictive performance for long-term respiratory and neurological outcomes in preterm infants.
METHODS
An electronic search identified studies in Medline and Embase from inception to August 2024. Studies assessing the performance of one or more BPD definitions for predicting long-term respiratory and/or neurological outcomes were included. We used the Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool for bias assessment. Reported prognostic accuracy of 5 BPD definitions (the 1988 Shennan, the 2001 National Institutes of Health [NIH], the 2017 Canadian Neonatal Network, the 2018 NIH, and the 2019 Neonatal Research Network definition) was tabulated using specificity, sensitivity, C statistic, risk, or odds ratio.
RESULTS
Of the 6045 identified studies, 18 were included. Heterogeneity between studies resulted in inconsistent prognostic accuracy for long-term outcomes. The 2001 NIH definition showed higher prognostic accuracy for respiratory and neurological outcomes compared with the 1988 Shennan BPD definition. Only 5 studies showed a low to moderate risk of bias, and a sensitivity analysis confirmed the results. The limitations included challenges in comparing studies due to population heterogeneity and outcome definitions.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review shows that comparisons between the 2001 NIH definition and newer BPD definitions yield inconsistent results for predicting long-term outcomes. None of the current BPD definitions consistently provided sufficient prognostic accuracy for long-term respiratory and neurodevelopmental sequelae in very preterm infants.
期刊介绍:
The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field.
The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability.
Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights.
As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.