{"title":"Clinical translation of polygenic scores for prostate cancer screening.","authors":"Dmitry Ratner,Jason L Vassy","doi":"10.1038/s41585-025-01095-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interest in using polygenic scores (PGS) to improve the risk stratification for and early detection of prostate cancer is considerable. Despite the absence of clinical guidelines for the use of prostate cancer PGS in patient care, existing and emerging standards for the clinical translation and reporting of genetic testing generally and PGS specifically provide a relevant framework to help guide these efforts. This framework is intended to harmonize advances in the development of PGS clinical assays and standardization of PGS reporting in the context of prostate cancer PGS specifically. The analytical and clinical validity of prostate cancer PGS have been progressively refined, but evidence firmly establishing clinical utility beyond modelling studies is still lacking. Standardized approaches for designing, explaining and reporting prostate cancer PGS are key to accelerating clinical implementation in a manner that would increase access to the benefits of precision prostate cancer screening to patients across ancestry backgrounds.","PeriodicalId":19088,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Urology","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-025-01095-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Interest in using polygenic scores (PGS) to improve the risk stratification for and early detection of prostate cancer is considerable. Despite the absence of clinical guidelines for the use of prostate cancer PGS in patient care, existing and emerging standards for the clinical translation and reporting of genetic testing generally and PGS specifically provide a relevant framework to help guide these efforts. This framework is intended to harmonize advances in the development of PGS clinical assays and standardization of PGS reporting in the context of prostate cancer PGS specifically. The analytical and clinical validity of prostate cancer PGS have been progressively refined, but evidence firmly establishing clinical utility beyond modelling studies is still lacking. Standardized approaches for designing, explaining and reporting prostate cancer PGS are key to accelerating clinical implementation in a manner that would increase access to the benefits of precision prostate cancer screening to patients across ancestry backgrounds.
期刊介绍:
Nature Reviews Urology is part of the Nature Reviews portfolio of journals.Nature Reviews' basic, translational and clinical content is written by internationally renowned basic and clinical academics and researchers. This journal targeted readers in the biological and medical sciences, from the postgraduate level upwards, aiming to be accessible to professionals in any biological or medical discipline.
The journal features authoritative In-depth Reviews providing up-to-date information on topics within a field's history and development. Perspectives, News & Views articles, and the Research Highlights section offer topical discussions and opinions, filtering primary research from various medical journals.
Covering a wide range of subjects, including andrology, urologic oncology, and imaging, Nature Reviews provides valuable insights for practitioners, researchers, and academics within urology and related fields.