Cortical thickness subtypes in cognitively unimpaired individuals: Differential network and transcriptomic vulnerability to cortical thinning

IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Luigi Lorenzini, Mario Tranfa, Leonard Pieperhoff, Federico Masserini, Mara ten Kate, Lyduine E. Collij, Giuseppe Pontillo, Emma S. Luckett, Alle Meije Wink, Henk JMM Mutsaerts, Tiago Gil Oliveira, Daniele Altomare, Mercè Boada, Anouk den Braber, Cindy Birck, Christopher Buckley, Gill Farrar, Wiesje van der Flier, Giovanni B. Frisoni, Rossella Gismondi, Juan Domingo Gispert, Bernard J. Hanseeuw, Frank Jessen, Marta Marquié, Anja Mett, Craig Ritchie, Gemma Salvadó, Michael Schöll, Mahnaz Shekari, Andrew W. Stephens, Betty M. Tijms, David Vállez García, Rik Vandenberghe, Pieter Jelle Visser, Luca Roccatagliata, Neil P. Oxtoby, Matteo Pardini, Frederik Barkhof
{"title":"Cortical thickness subtypes in cognitively unimpaired individuals: Differential network and transcriptomic vulnerability to cortical thinning","authors":"Luigi Lorenzini,&nbsp;Mario Tranfa,&nbsp;Leonard Pieperhoff,&nbsp;Federico Masserini,&nbsp;Mara ten Kate,&nbsp;Lyduine E. Collij,&nbsp;Giuseppe Pontillo,&nbsp;Emma S. Luckett,&nbsp;Alle Meije Wink,&nbsp;Henk JMM Mutsaerts,&nbsp;Tiago Gil Oliveira,&nbsp;Daniele Altomare,&nbsp;Mercè Boada,&nbsp;Anouk den Braber,&nbsp;Cindy Birck,&nbsp;Christopher Buckley,&nbsp;Gill Farrar,&nbsp;Wiesje van der Flier,&nbsp;Giovanni B. Frisoni,&nbsp;Rossella Gismondi,&nbsp;Juan Domingo Gispert,&nbsp;Bernard J. Hanseeuw,&nbsp;Frank Jessen,&nbsp;Marta Marquié,&nbsp;Anja Mett,&nbsp;Craig Ritchie,&nbsp;Gemma Salvadó,&nbsp;Michael Schöll,&nbsp;Mahnaz Shekari,&nbsp;Andrew W. Stephens,&nbsp;Betty M. Tijms,&nbsp;David Vállez García,&nbsp;Rik Vandenberghe,&nbsp;Pieter Jelle Visser,&nbsp;Luca Roccatagliata,&nbsp;Neil P. Oxtoby,&nbsp;Matteo Pardini,&nbsp;Frederik Barkhof","doi":"10.1002/alz.70762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\n \n <p>The emergence, stability, and contributing factors of Alzheimer's disease (AD) gray matter subtypes remain unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed data from 1323 individuals without a diagnosis of dementia (CDR &lt; 1) with T1w-MRI and amyloid-PET, including 622 with longitudinal data (3.66 ± 1.78 years). Cortical thickness subtypes were identified using a non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) clustering algorithm. We examined clinical and demographic differences, subtype stability, and longitudinal thinning patterns using brain network models and imaging-transcriptomic analysis. Replication was performed with an alternative clustering approach and a validation cohort.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>Two stable subtypes emerged: limbic-predominant and hippocampal-sparing. Limbic-predominant participants were older, had higher amyloid burden, and faster memory decline, while hippocampal-sparing individuals showed greater attention and executive function decline. Distinct thinning patterns were linked to specific network properties and gene expression profiles.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>These MRI-based subtypes reflect underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and may aid in prognostication and clinical trial stratification.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Two gray matter thickness subtypes can already be identified in preclinical stages, exhibiting distinct clinical characteristics and progression patterns.</li>\n \n <li>Individual subtype assignment remains stable over time.</li>\n \n <li>Longitudinal cortical thinning patterns follow distinct network- and transcriptomic-based mechanisms within each subtype.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"21 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.70762","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alz.70762","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The emergence, stability, and contributing factors of Alzheimer's disease (AD) gray matter subtypes remain unclear.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 1323 individuals without a diagnosis of dementia (CDR < 1) with T1w-MRI and amyloid-PET, including 622 with longitudinal data (3.66 ± 1.78 years). Cortical thickness subtypes were identified using a non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) clustering algorithm. We examined clinical and demographic differences, subtype stability, and longitudinal thinning patterns using brain network models and imaging-transcriptomic analysis. Replication was performed with an alternative clustering approach and a validation cohort.

RESULTS

Two stable subtypes emerged: limbic-predominant and hippocampal-sparing. Limbic-predominant participants were older, had higher amyloid burden, and faster memory decline, while hippocampal-sparing individuals showed greater attention and executive function decline. Distinct thinning patterns were linked to specific network properties and gene expression profiles.

DISCUSSION

These MRI-based subtypes reflect underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and may aid in prognostication and clinical trial stratification.

Highlights

  • Two gray matter thickness subtypes can already be identified in preclinical stages, exhibiting distinct clinical characteristics and progression patterns.
  • Individual subtype assignment remains stable over time.
  • Longitudinal cortical thinning patterns follow distinct network- and transcriptomic-based mechanisms within each subtype.

Abstract Image

认知未受损个体的皮质厚度亚型:对皮质变薄的差异网络和转录组易感性
阿尔茨海默病(AD)灰质亚型的出现、稳定性和影响因素尚不清楚。方法:我们分析了1323例未诊断为痴呆(CDR < 1)的T1w‐MRI和淀粉样蛋白‐PET数据,其中622例具有纵向数据(3.66±1.78年)。使用非负矩阵分解(NMF)聚类算法识别皮质厚度亚型。我们使用脑网络模型和成像转录组学分析检查了临床和人口统计学差异、亚型稳定性和纵向变薄模式。采用另一种聚类方法和验证队列进行复制。结果出现了两种稳定的亚型:边缘优势型和海马保留型。大脑边缘占优势的参与者年龄较大,淀粉样蛋白负担较高,记忆力下降较快,而海马保留个体表现出更大的注意力和执行功能下降。不同的变薄模式与特定的网络特性和基因表达谱有关。这些基于MRI的亚型反映了潜在的病理生理机制,可能有助于预后和临床试验分层。两种灰质厚度亚型在临床前阶段已经被确定,表现出不同的临床特征和进展模式。个体亚型分配随时间保持稳定。在每个亚型中,纵向皮质变薄模式遵循不同的基于网络和转录组学的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信