Jiuwei Lu, Xinyi Chen, Jian Fang, Daniel Li, Huy Le, Xuehua Zhong, Jikui Song
{"title":"Structure and autoinhibitory regulation of MET1 in the maintenance of plant CG methylation","authors":"Jiuwei Lu, Xinyi Chen, Jian Fang, Daniel Li, Huy Le, Xuehua Zhong, Jikui Song","doi":"10.1093/plcell/koaf246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Plant DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE 1 (MET1) is responsible for maintaining genome-wide CG methylation. Its dysregulation has been linked to profound biological disruptions, including genomic instability and developmental defects. However, the exact mechanism by which MET1 orchestrates these vital functions and coordinates its various domains to shape the plant-specific epigenome remains unknown. Here, we report the cryo-EM structure of Arabidopsis thaliana MET1 (AtMET1), revealing an autoinhibitory mechanism that governs its DNA methylation activity. Between the two replication-foci-target sequence (RFTS) domains in AtMET1, the second RFTS domain (RFTS2) directly associates with the methyltransferase (MTase) domain, thereby inhibiting substrate-binding activity. Compared to DNMT1, AtMET1 lacks the CXXC domain and its downstream autoinhibitory linker, featuring only limited RFTS2-MTase interactions, resulting in a much-reduced autoinhibitory contact. In line with this difference, the DNA methylation activity of AtMET1 displays less temperature dependence than that of DNMT1, potentially allowing MET1 to maintain its activity across diverse temperature conditions. We further report the structure of AtMET1 bound to hemimethylated CG (hmCG) DNA, unveiling the molecular basis for substrate binding and CG recognition by AtMET1, and an activation mechanism that involves a coordinated conformational shift between two structural elements of its active site. In addition, our combined structural and biochemical analysis highlights distinct functionalities between the two RFTS domains of AtMET1, unraveling their evolutionary divergence from the DNMT1 RFTS domain. Together, this study offers a framework for understanding the structure and mechanism of AtMET1, with profound implications for the maintenance of CG methylation in plants.","PeriodicalId":501012,"journal":{"name":"The Plant Cell","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Plant Cell","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koaf246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Plant DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE 1 (MET1) is responsible for maintaining genome-wide CG methylation. Its dysregulation has been linked to profound biological disruptions, including genomic instability and developmental defects. However, the exact mechanism by which MET1 orchestrates these vital functions and coordinates its various domains to shape the plant-specific epigenome remains unknown. Here, we report the cryo-EM structure of Arabidopsis thaliana MET1 (AtMET1), revealing an autoinhibitory mechanism that governs its DNA methylation activity. Between the two replication-foci-target sequence (RFTS) domains in AtMET1, the second RFTS domain (RFTS2) directly associates with the methyltransferase (MTase) domain, thereby inhibiting substrate-binding activity. Compared to DNMT1, AtMET1 lacks the CXXC domain and its downstream autoinhibitory linker, featuring only limited RFTS2-MTase interactions, resulting in a much-reduced autoinhibitory contact. In line with this difference, the DNA methylation activity of AtMET1 displays less temperature dependence than that of DNMT1, potentially allowing MET1 to maintain its activity across diverse temperature conditions. We further report the structure of AtMET1 bound to hemimethylated CG (hmCG) DNA, unveiling the molecular basis for substrate binding and CG recognition by AtMET1, and an activation mechanism that involves a coordinated conformational shift between two structural elements of its active site. In addition, our combined structural and biochemical analysis highlights distinct functionalities between the two RFTS domains of AtMET1, unraveling their evolutionary divergence from the DNMT1 RFTS domain. Together, this study offers a framework for understanding the structure and mechanism of AtMET1, with profound implications for the maintenance of CG methylation in plants.