The Colonial Metamorphosis of Egyptian Capital Punishment, 1884–1903

IF 2.4 1区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Alaa El-Shafei
{"title":"The Colonial Metamorphosis of Egyptian Capital Punishment, 1884–1903","authors":"Alaa El-Shafei","doi":"10.1093/pastj/gtaf030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses how colonial rule remade Egyptian capital punishment. Around the turn of the twentieth century, British officials deliberately overturned the strong protections for defendants that Islamic law once offered, paving the way for a steady and sustained increase in execution rates. More executions meant more opportunities for ordinary people to practise the distinctive forms of ‘popular legalism’ that flourished on execution days. In keeping with established custom, the families of perpetrator and victim played leading roles on gallows days, defending kin and negotiating punishment. Women often took charge of these occasions, demonstrating and enhancing their social power while simultaneously directing the affective responses of the assembled crowds. Such public displays of gendered authority were anathema to Egyptian elites and colonial officials alike, turning both decisively against public punishment. The abolition of public executions thus erased a prominent manifestation of the social embeddedness of Islamic law.","PeriodicalId":47870,"journal":{"name":"Past & Present","volume":"135 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Past & Present","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtaf030","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyses how colonial rule remade Egyptian capital punishment. Around the turn of the twentieth century, British officials deliberately overturned the strong protections for defendants that Islamic law once offered, paving the way for a steady and sustained increase in execution rates. More executions meant more opportunities for ordinary people to practise the distinctive forms of ‘popular legalism’ that flourished on execution days. In keeping with established custom, the families of perpetrator and victim played leading roles on gallows days, defending kin and negotiating punishment. Women often took charge of these occasions, demonstrating and enhancing their social power while simultaneously directing the affective responses of the assembled crowds. Such public displays of gendered authority were anathema to Egyptian elites and colonial officials alike, turning both decisively against public punishment. The abolition of public executions thus erased a prominent manifestation of the social embeddedness of Islamic law.
埃及死刑的殖民蜕变,1884-1903
本文分析了殖民统治对埃及死刑制度的影响。在二十世纪之交,英国官员故意推翻了伊斯兰法律曾经对被告提供的强有力保护,为死刑执行率的稳步持续增长铺平了道路。更多的处决意味着普通人有更多的机会实践在处决日盛行的独特形式的“大众法家”。按照既定习俗,罪犯和受害者的家属在绞刑架上扮演主要角色,为亲属辩护并协商惩罚。妇女经常负责这些场合,展示和增强她们的社会权力,同时指导聚集的人群的情感反应。这种公开展示性别权威的行为,对埃及精英和殖民官员来说都是深恶痛绝的,他们果断地反对公开惩罚。因此,公开处决的废除抹去了伊斯兰法律的社会嵌入性的一个突出表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Past & Present
Past & Present Multiple-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Founded in 1952, Past & Present is widely acknowledged to be the liveliest and most stimulating historical journal in the English-speaking world. The journal offers: •A wide variety of scholarly and original articles on historical, social and cultural change in all parts of the world. •Four issues a year, each containing five or six major articles plus occasional debates and review essays. •Challenging work by young historians as well as seminal articles by internationally regarded scholars. •A range of articles that appeal to specialists and non-specialists, and communicate the results of the most recent historical research in a readable and lively form. •A forum for debate, encouraging productive controversy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信