When a Patient Dies During a Procedure: Navigating Operator Grief in Interventional Cardiology.

George Touma, Sarah Fairley, William Lombardi, Cuneyt Ada, Bernard Wong, Bharat Khialani
{"title":"When a Patient Dies During a Procedure: Navigating Operator Grief in Interventional Cardiology.","authors":"George Touma, Sarah Fairley, William Lombardi, Cuneyt Ada, Bernard Wong, Bharat Khialani","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Procedural mortality, though uncommon, remains a profound emotional challenge in interventional cardiology. The death of a patient during a procedure is not merely a technical outcome-it deeply affects the operator, triggering grief, self-doubt, and psychological trauma. This review explores the multifaceted emotional toll of intra-procedural death, examining how operator grief intersects with moral injury, burnout, and threats to professional identity. We identify cognitive and cultural barriers to recovery-such as outcome bias, replay loops, and compartmentalization-that impede emotional healing. The immediacy of procedural trauma, compounded by systemic silence and lack of institutional support, often prolongs distress and suppresses vulnerability. Importantly, we outline evidence-informed strategies for sustainable recovery at both individual and institutional levels. These include reflective practice, reconnecting with patient families, peer dialogue, structured debriefing, and culturally attuned support models. Redefining vulnerability as professionalism and embedding psychological safety within organizational culture are essential for meaningful reform. Recognizing and addressing operator grief is crucial not only for clinician well-being but also for preserving the empathy and decision-making clarity that underpin high-quality cardiovascular care.</p>","PeriodicalId":520583,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Procedural mortality, though uncommon, remains a profound emotional challenge in interventional cardiology. The death of a patient during a procedure is not merely a technical outcome-it deeply affects the operator, triggering grief, self-doubt, and psychological trauma. This review explores the multifaceted emotional toll of intra-procedural death, examining how operator grief intersects with moral injury, burnout, and threats to professional identity. We identify cognitive and cultural barriers to recovery-such as outcome bias, replay loops, and compartmentalization-that impede emotional healing. The immediacy of procedural trauma, compounded by systemic silence and lack of institutional support, often prolongs distress and suppresses vulnerability. Importantly, we outline evidence-informed strategies for sustainable recovery at both individual and institutional levels. These include reflective practice, reconnecting with patient families, peer dialogue, structured debriefing, and culturally attuned support models. Redefining vulnerability as professionalism and embedding psychological safety within organizational culture are essential for meaningful reform. Recognizing and addressing operator grief is crucial not only for clinician well-being but also for preserving the empathy and decision-making clarity that underpin high-quality cardiovascular care.

当病人在手术过程中死亡:在介入心脏病学中导航操作员悲伤。
程序性死亡率虽然不常见,但在介入心脏病学中仍然是一个深刻的情感挑战。病人在手术过程中的死亡不仅仅是一个技术结果——它深刻地影响着操作者,引发悲伤、自我怀疑和心理创伤。这篇综述探讨了程序内死亡的多方面情感代价,研究了操作员的悲伤如何与道德伤害、倦怠和对职业身份的威胁交织在一起。我们发现了阻碍恢复的认知和文化障碍——比如结果偏差、重播循环和划分——阻碍了情感愈合。程序性创伤的即时性,加上系统的沉默和缺乏机构支持,往往会延长痛苦和压制脆弱性。重要的是,我们在个人和机构层面概述了基于证据的可持续复苏战略。这些措施包括反思性实践、与患者家属重新建立联系、同伴对话、结构化汇报以及与文化相适应的支持模式。将脆弱性重新定义为专业性,并在组织文化中嵌入心理安全,是进行有意义改革的必要条件。认识和处理操作员的悲痛不仅对临床医生的福祉至关重要,而且对保持同情和决策清晰度至关重要,这是高质量心血管护理的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信