Predictive Value of the Academic Research Consortium High Bleeding Risk Criteria in Self-Identified Black Individuals Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Rebecca M Cohen, Francesca Maria Di Muro, Samantha Sartori, Birgit Vogel, Sydney E Lupo, Kenneth F Smith, Amit Hooda, Samin K Sharma, Annapoorna Kini, Roxana Mehran
{"title":"Predictive Value of the Academic Research Consortium High Bleeding Risk Criteria in Self-Identified Black Individuals Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.","authors":"Rebecca M Cohen, Francesca Maria Di Muro, Samantha Sartori, Birgit Vogel, Sydney E Lupo, Kenneth F Smith, Amit Hooda, Samin K Sharma, Annapoorna Kini, Roxana Mehran","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whether the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria are a valuable tool for risk stratification in self-identified Black patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to assess the predictive ability of the ARC-HBR criteria in patients who identify as Black and White.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients undergoing PCI at a large tertiary-care center from 2012 to 2019, and self-reporting as Black or White, were included in the current retrospective observational analysis and stratified into HBR and non-HBR based on the ARC-HBR definition. The primary outcome was all-bleeding, defined as a composite of peri-procedural in-hospital and post-discharge bleeding at 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included post-discharge bleeding, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)-a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke- and its individual components. The discriminative ability of the ARC-HBR criteria to predict outcomes was computed using Harrell's C-index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 9462 patients included, 1881 (19.9%) identified as Black and 7581 (80.1%) as White. In these two groups, 50.8% of Black and 45.6% of White patients were classified as HBR, and a different distribution of the individual major and minor criteria was observed. Within the Black cohort, HBR was associated with a significantly higher risk of the primary bleeding endpoint, MACE, and all-cause mortality, with only a trend toward a higher rate of post-discharge bleeding and MI. Conversely, among White patients, HBR was associated with a significantly higher risk of the primary bleeding endpoint, as well as all secondary endpoints. These findings were confirmed after multivariable adjustment, with no significant interaction between race and HBR status with regard to outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this contemporary PCI registry, the ARC-HBR criteria showed a good ability in identifying patients at increased risk of bleeding and thrombotic events, irrespective of self-reported Black or White race.</p>","PeriodicalId":520583,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Whether the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria are a valuable tool for risk stratification in self-identified Black patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain.

Aims: This study aims to assess the predictive ability of the ARC-HBR criteria in patients who identify as Black and White.

Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing PCI at a large tertiary-care center from 2012 to 2019, and self-reporting as Black or White, were included in the current retrospective observational analysis and stratified into HBR and non-HBR based on the ARC-HBR definition. The primary outcome was all-bleeding, defined as a composite of peri-procedural in-hospital and post-discharge bleeding at 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included post-discharge bleeding, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)-a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke- and its individual components. The discriminative ability of the ARC-HBR criteria to predict outcomes was computed using Harrell's C-index.

Results: Among 9462 patients included, 1881 (19.9%) identified as Black and 7581 (80.1%) as White. In these two groups, 50.8% of Black and 45.6% of White patients were classified as HBR, and a different distribution of the individual major and minor criteria was observed. Within the Black cohort, HBR was associated with a significantly higher risk of the primary bleeding endpoint, MACE, and all-cause mortality, with only a trend toward a higher rate of post-discharge bleeding and MI. Conversely, among White patients, HBR was associated with a significantly higher risk of the primary bleeding endpoint, as well as all secondary endpoints. These findings were confirmed after multivariable adjustment, with no significant interaction between race and HBR status with regard to outcomes.

Conclusions: In this contemporary PCI registry, the ARC-HBR criteria showed a good ability in identifying patients at increased risk of bleeding and thrombotic events, irrespective of self-reported Black or White race.

学术研究联盟高出血风险标准在黑人经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的预测价值。
背景:在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的黑人患者中,高出血风险学术研究联盟(ARC-HBR)标准是否是一个有价值的风险分层工具仍不确定。目的:本研究旨在评估ARC-HBR标准对黑人和白人患者的预测能力。方法:回顾性观察分析纳入2012年至2019年在一家大型三级医疗中心连续接受PCI治疗、自我报告为黑人或白人的患者,并根据ARC-HBR定义将其分为HBR和非HBR。主要终点为全出血,定义为1年随访期间术中住院和出院后出血的综合情况。次要结局包括出院后出血、主要不良心血管事件(MACE)——全因死亡、心肌梗死或中风的组合——及其单个组成部分。ARC-HBR标准预测预后的判别能力采用Harrell的c指数计算。结果:9462例患者中,黑人1881例(19.9%),白人7581例(80.1%)。在这两组中,50.8%的黑人和45.6%的白人患者被归类为HBR,并且观察到个体主要和次要标准的不同分布。在黑人队列中,HBR与主要出血终点、MACE和全因死亡率的风险显著升高相关,仅有较高的出院后出血和心肌梗死发生率的趋势。相反,在白人患者中,HBR与主要出血终点以及所有次要终点的风险显著升高相关。这些发现在多变量调整后得到证实,种族和HBR状态之间没有显著的相互作用。结论:在这个当代PCI登记中,ARC-HBR标准在识别出血和血栓事件风险增加的患者方面表现出良好的能力,无论自我报告的黑人或白人种族。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信