Applying DanGer Shock Eligibility Criteria to a Real-World Cohort of Cardiogenic Shock Patients.

Raffaela Miriam Planka, Lukas Herold, Theresa Glantschnig, Gudrun Sommer, Jonathan Pavek, Stefan Hatzl, Nicolas Verheyen, Christoph Strohhofer, Johannes Gollmer, Ewald Kolesnik, Martin Benedikt, Markus Wallner, Andreas Zirlik, Gabor Toth-Gayor, Dirk von Lewinski
{"title":"Applying DanGer Shock Eligibility Criteria to a Real-World Cohort of Cardiogenic Shock Patients.","authors":"Raffaela Miriam Planka, Lukas Herold, Theresa Glantschnig, Gudrun Sommer, Jonathan Pavek, Stefan Hatzl, Nicolas Verheyen, Christoph Strohhofer, Johannes Gollmer, Ewald Kolesnik, Martin Benedikt, Markus Wallner, Andreas Zirlik, Gabor Toth-Gayor, Dirk von Lewinski","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The DanGer Shock trial investigated the effects of adding a microaxial flow pump to guideline-recommended therapy in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)-related cardiogenic shock (CS), finding a lower all-cause mortality at 180 days in the intervention group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>DanGer Shock eligibility criteria were applied to the prospective single-center PREPARE CardShock registry, which consecutively enrolled 721 patients between April 2019 and August 2024 with advanced CS-classified as stages C to E according to the SCAI shock classification-who were on vasoactive medication and underwent cardiac catheterization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 721 patients in the registry, 384 (53.3%) had STEMI-related CS. Of those, 117 (30.5%) met DanGer Shock trial eligibility criteria, accounting for 16.2% of the registry cohort. Median age of the eligible patients was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 58-78), and 62.4% were male, compared to 68 years (IQR: 60-76) and 79.2% in DanGer Shock. PREPRARE-CS DanGer Shock eligible patients had a higher median systolic blood pressure (SBP) (92 mmHG [78-107] vs. 83 mmHG, [72-91]) and higher median lactate levels (5.2 mmol/L [3.6-7.6] vs. 4.6 mmol/L [3.3-7.0]) at baseline, and were more frequently resuscitated (56.4% vs. 20.3%). Device use was 42.7% in eligible patients. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) was more frequent among trial participants (34.4% vs. 17.1%). The 180-day mortality rate among eligible patients was 71.8%, compared to 52.1% in trial participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among STEMI-related CS patients in our cohort, only one-third met the DanGer Shock eligibility criteria. Consequently, trial outcomes may not be broadly applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":520583,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The DanGer Shock trial investigated the effects of adding a microaxial flow pump to guideline-recommended therapy in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)-related cardiogenic shock (CS), finding a lower all-cause mortality at 180 days in the intervention group.

Methods: DanGer Shock eligibility criteria were applied to the prospective single-center PREPARE CardShock registry, which consecutively enrolled 721 patients between April 2019 and August 2024 with advanced CS-classified as stages C to E according to the SCAI shock classification-who were on vasoactive medication and underwent cardiac catheterization.

Results: Among 721 patients in the registry, 384 (53.3%) had STEMI-related CS. Of those, 117 (30.5%) met DanGer Shock trial eligibility criteria, accounting for 16.2% of the registry cohort. Median age of the eligible patients was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 58-78), and 62.4% were male, compared to 68 years (IQR: 60-76) and 79.2% in DanGer Shock. PREPRARE-CS DanGer Shock eligible patients had a higher median systolic blood pressure (SBP) (92 mmHG [78-107] vs. 83 mmHG, [72-91]) and higher median lactate levels (5.2 mmol/L [3.6-7.6] vs. 4.6 mmol/L [3.3-7.0]) at baseline, and were more frequently resuscitated (56.4% vs. 20.3%). Device use was 42.7% in eligible patients. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) was more frequent among trial participants (34.4% vs. 17.1%). The 180-day mortality rate among eligible patients was 71.8%, compared to 52.1% in trial participants.

Conclusions: Among STEMI-related CS patients in our cohort, only one-third met the DanGer Shock eligibility criteria. Consequently, trial outcomes may not be broadly applicable.

在真实世界心源性休克患者队列中应用危险休克资格标准。
背景:DanGer Shock试验研究了在st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)相关心源性休克(CS)患者的指南推荐治疗中加入微轴流泵的效果,发现干预组180天的全因死亡率较低。方法:危险休克资格标准应用于前瞻性单中心PREPARE CardShock登记,该登记在2019年4月至2024年8月期间连续入组721例晚期cs -根据SCAI休克分类为C至E期-接受血管活性药物治疗并接受心导管插入术的患者。结果:在登记的721例患者中,384例(53.3%)患有stemi相关CS。其中,117例(30.5%)符合危险休克试验资格标准,占注册队列的16.2%。符合条件的患者中位年龄为68岁(四分位间距[IQR]: 58-78),男性占62.4%,而危险休克患者中位年龄为68岁(IQR: 60-76),男性占79.2%。符合prep - cs危险休克条件的患者在基线时具有较高的中位收缩压(SBP) (92 mmHG[78-107]对83 mmHG,[72-91])和较高的中位乳酸水平(5.2 mmol/L[3.6-7.6]对4.6 mmol/L[3.3-7.0]),并且更频繁地复苏(56.4%对20.3%)。符合条件的患者中器械使用率为42.7%。肾脏替代治疗(RRT)在试验参与者中更为常见(34.4%对17.1%)。符合条件的患者的180天死亡率为71.8%,而试验参与者的180天死亡率为52.1%。结论:在我们的队列中,stemi相关的CS患者中只有三分之一符合危险休克的资格标准。因此,试验结果可能不能广泛适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信