Pain Measurement in Infants and Children With and at Risk for Intellectual Disabilities.

Paediatric & neonatal pain Pub Date : 2025-10-11 eCollection Date: 2025-12-01 DOI:10.1002/pne2.70015
Morgan MacNeil, Britney Benoit, Timothy Disher, Aaron J Newman, Marsha Campbell-Yeo
{"title":"Pain Measurement in Infants and Children With and at Risk for Intellectual Disabilities.","authors":"Morgan MacNeil, Britney Benoit, Timothy Disher, Aaron J Newman, Marsha Campbell-Yeo","doi":"10.1002/pne2.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Standards of patient care require that comprehensive pain assessments be conducted at routine intervals. Infants and children with and at risk for intellectual disabilities, who are at high risk for experiencing pain, receive significantly less representation in the literature to inform pain measurement practice. The objectives of this review include (1) review and discuss the current literature surrounding pain measurement in infants and children with and at risk for intellectual disabilities, (2) define pain assessment tools, scales, and measures that are being used in infants and children with and at risk for intellectual disabilities, (3) discuss the strengths and limitations of the pain assessment tools, scales, and measures, (4) make recommendations for future pain research focused on this population. A narrative review of the literature regarding pain measures in infants and children with and at risk for intellectual disabilities was conducted using PubMed. A search strategy was created in consultation with a librarian scientist. There were no date limiters applied to the search. Pain measures can be classified as self-report, behavioral (e.g., cry, facial expressions), physiological (e.g., heart rate, biomarkers, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate), and neurophysiological (electroencephalogram, functional magnetic resonance imaging, near infrared spectroscopy). There is a considerable dearth in the literature surrounding pain measures and pain indicators in this population, along with small sample sizes and inconsistent findings reported across studies. Future research is needed to compare pain responses across different age groups and intellectual disability diagnoses to neurotypical peers.</p>","PeriodicalId":94166,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric & neonatal pain","volume":"7 4","pages":"e70015"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12514732/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric & neonatal pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pne2.70015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Standards of patient care require that comprehensive pain assessments be conducted at routine intervals. Infants and children with and at risk for intellectual disabilities, who are at high risk for experiencing pain, receive significantly less representation in the literature to inform pain measurement practice. The objectives of this review include (1) review and discuss the current literature surrounding pain measurement in infants and children with and at risk for intellectual disabilities, (2) define pain assessment tools, scales, and measures that are being used in infants and children with and at risk for intellectual disabilities, (3) discuss the strengths and limitations of the pain assessment tools, scales, and measures, (4) make recommendations for future pain research focused on this population. A narrative review of the literature regarding pain measures in infants and children with and at risk for intellectual disabilities was conducted using PubMed. A search strategy was created in consultation with a librarian scientist. There were no date limiters applied to the search. Pain measures can be classified as self-report, behavioral (e.g., cry, facial expressions), physiological (e.g., heart rate, biomarkers, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate), and neurophysiological (electroencephalogram, functional magnetic resonance imaging, near infrared spectroscopy). There is a considerable dearth in the literature surrounding pain measures and pain indicators in this population, along with small sample sizes and inconsistent findings reported across studies. Future research is needed to compare pain responses across different age groups and intellectual disability diagnoses to neurotypical peers.

有智力障碍和有智力障碍风险的婴儿和儿童疼痛测量。
病人护理标准要求在常规间隔进行全面的疼痛评估。患有和有智力残疾风险的婴儿和儿童,他们经历疼痛的风险很高,在文献中很少有代表性,以告知疼痛测量实践。本综述的目的包括(1)回顾和讨论目前关于智力障碍婴儿和儿童疼痛测量的文献;(2)定义用于智力障碍婴儿和儿童的疼痛评估工具、量表和测量方法;(3)讨论疼痛评估工具、量表和测量方法的优势和局限性。(4)对今后针对这一人群的疼痛研究提出建议。使用PubMed对患有和有智力残疾风险的婴儿和儿童疼痛措施的文献进行了叙述性回顾。在与图书管理员科学家协商后,我们制定了一项搜索策略。没有日期限制应用于搜索。疼痛测量可分为自我报告、行为(如哭泣、面部表情)、生理(如心率、生物标志物、血氧饱和度、呼吸频率)和神经生理(脑电图、功能磁共振成像、近红外光谱)。关于这一人群的疼痛测量和疼痛指标的文献相当缺乏,同时样本量小,各研究报告的结果不一致。未来的研究需要比较不同年龄组的疼痛反应和智力残疾诊断与神经正常的同龄人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书