Ethical Management of Elective Surgery Waiting Lists : A Framework of Clinicians' Values in Action.

IF 1.5 3区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Sharon Feldman, Katheryn Hall, Danielle Ko, Rosalind McDougall
{"title":"Ethical Management of Elective Surgery Waiting Lists : A Framework of Clinicians' Values in Action.","authors":"Sharon Feldman, Katheryn Hall, Danielle Ko, Rosalind McDougall","doi":"10.1007/s11673-025-10481-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Waiting time for elective surgery in public health systems has long been a focus for health institutions and governments. Such focus, and existing ethics literature, tends to hover at a policy or systems level. However, long waiting lists also create ethical challenges at the level of individuals' clinical practice. This project expands the focus of the elective surgery waiting list discussion from the macro systems level to the micro clinician level. We put forward a framework of values driving clinicians' ethical practice in this area, based on a literature review and iterative ethicist-led discussions with eighteen key surgical staff in one hospital network in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. While sensitive to population-level values at play, clinicians' primary moral orientation was towards the individual patients they cared for. This orientation saw clinicians implement additional values in their practice including supporting patient autonomy through informed consent, maximizing benefits to individuals by considering patients holistically, minimizing harms to individual patients related to time spent waiting, and consistency of decision-making within teams and departments. By articulating values that can be translated into action within clinicians' sphere of agency, the framework aims to support ethical practice among surgical staff working within a constrained and imperfect system.</p>","PeriodicalId":50252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-025-10481-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Waiting time for elective surgery in public health systems has long been a focus for health institutions and governments. Such focus, and existing ethics literature, tends to hover at a policy or systems level. However, long waiting lists also create ethical challenges at the level of individuals' clinical practice. This project expands the focus of the elective surgery waiting list discussion from the macro systems level to the micro clinician level. We put forward a framework of values driving clinicians' ethical practice in this area, based on a literature review and iterative ethicist-led discussions with eighteen key surgical staff in one hospital network in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. While sensitive to population-level values at play, clinicians' primary moral orientation was towards the individual patients they cared for. This orientation saw clinicians implement additional values in their practice including supporting patient autonomy through informed consent, maximizing benefits to individuals by considering patients holistically, minimizing harms to individual patients related to time spent waiting, and consistency of decision-making within teams and departments. By articulating values that can be translated into action within clinicians' sphere of agency, the framework aims to support ethical practice among surgical staff working within a constrained and imperfect system.

择期手术候诊名单的伦理管理:临床医生在行动中的价值框架。
长期以来,公共卫生系统择期手术的等待时间一直是卫生机构和政府关注的焦点。这样的焦点,以及现有的伦理文献,往往停留在政策或系统层面。然而,漫长的等待名单也在个人临床实践层面带来了伦理挑战。本课题将择期手术候诊名单讨论的重点从宏观系统层面扩展到微观临床层面。我们提出了一个价值观框架,推动临床医生的道德实践在这一领域,基于文献综述和迭代伦理学主导的讨论,18名关键外科工作人员在大都市墨尔本,澳大利亚的一个医院网络。虽然对人群水平的价值观很敏感,但临床医生的主要道德取向是针对他们所照顾的个体患者。在这个方向上,临床医生在实践中实施了额外的价值,包括通过知情同意支持患者的自主权,通过整体考虑患者来最大化个人利益,最大限度地减少与等待时间相关的个体患者伤害,以及团队和部门内决策的一致性。通过阐明可在临床医生代理范围内转化为行动的价值观,该框架旨在支持在受限和不完善的系统中工作的外科人员的道德实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
67
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The JBI welcomes both reports of empirical research and articles that increase theoretical understanding of medicine and health care, the health professions and the biological sciences. The JBI is also open to critical reflections on medicine and conventional bioethics, the nature of health, illness and disability, the sources of ethics, the nature of ethical communities, and possible implications of new developments in science and technology for social and cultural life and human identity. We welcome contributions from perspectives that are less commonly published in existing journals in the field and reports of empirical research studies using both qualitative and quantitative methodologies. The JBI accepts contributions from authors working in or across disciplines including – but not limited to – the following: -philosophy- bioethics- economics- social theory- law- public health and epidemiology- anthropology- psychology- feminism- gay and lesbian studies- linguistics and discourse analysis- cultural studies- disability studies- history- literature and literary studies- environmental sciences- theology and religious studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信