{"title":"Sarcopenia as a Stronger Predictor for All-Cause Mortality Than Osteoporosis in a Medical Center in Central Taiwan.","authors":"Pei-Iun Hsieh, Shih-Yi Lin, Chiann-Yi Hsu, Shih-Ming Huang, Hsin-Ti Huang, Shuo-Chun Weng","doi":"10.2147/CIA.S548332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Sarcopenia (SP) and osteoporosis (OP) both pose higher risks for adverse health outcomes. This study explored the relationship among sarcopenia, osteoporosis and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort utilized a tertiary-hospital-based cohort during the years from 2018 to 2024. Patients received dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans. Osteoporosis was diagnosed when T-scores of <-2.5 were determined at the L-spine or femoral neck. Sarcopenia was defined using the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 criteria: low muscle strength, low physical performance, and a low appendicular skeletal mass index. We utilized the Cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier curves to depict observed time to mortality. Post-hoc analysis was applied for subgroup comparison and statistical power calculation. Interaction terms sensitivity analysis was used for analyzing mutually exclusive groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 545 patients (median age [interquartile range] 68.7 [52.8-80.7] years; 72.3% women) were analyzed. At baseline, 15.6% had SP alone, 23.1% had OP alone, and 14.3% had both conditions. Over median 0.7 (interquartile range = 0.2-1.4) years of follow-up, 24 deaths occurred. Older age, multimorbidity, sarcopenia, and osteoporosis were significantly associated with higher mortality. In multivariable analysis adjusting for age and multimorbidity, sarcopenia alone was a stronger predictor of mortality compared to osteoporosis alone (hazard ratio [HR] 7.34 vs 3.99), and the mortality HR was 7.34 for sarcopenia with or without osteoporosis higher than 3.99 for osteoporosis with/without sarcopenia. Interaction analysis was not feasible in the four-group comparison, as the interaction term overlapped with the 'both sarcopenia and osteoporosis' group; in the other three groups, the SP×OP interaction was not significant. SP patients were more likely to be older, male, and have lower body mass index, total tissue, and lean mass.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that sarcopenia may be a more important predictor of mortality than osteoporosis in patients, highlighting the need for muscle health assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48841,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","volume":"20 ","pages":"1681-1692"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12515008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S548332","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Sarcopenia (SP) and osteoporosis (OP) both pose higher risks for adverse health outcomes. This study explored the relationship among sarcopenia, osteoporosis and all-cause mortality.
Patients and methods: This retrospective cohort utilized a tertiary-hospital-based cohort during the years from 2018 to 2024. Patients received dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans. Osteoporosis was diagnosed when T-scores of <-2.5 were determined at the L-spine or femoral neck. Sarcopenia was defined using the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 criteria: low muscle strength, low physical performance, and a low appendicular skeletal mass index. We utilized the Cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier curves to depict observed time to mortality. Post-hoc analysis was applied for subgroup comparison and statistical power calculation. Interaction terms sensitivity analysis was used for analyzing mutually exclusive groups.
Results: A total of 545 patients (median age [interquartile range] 68.7 [52.8-80.7] years; 72.3% women) were analyzed. At baseline, 15.6% had SP alone, 23.1% had OP alone, and 14.3% had both conditions. Over median 0.7 (interquartile range = 0.2-1.4) years of follow-up, 24 deaths occurred. Older age, multimorbidity, sarcopenia, and osteoporosis were significantly associated with higher mortality. In multivariable analysis adjusting for age and multimorbidity, sarcopenia alone was a stronger predictor of mortality compared to osteoporosis alone (hazard ratio [HR] 7.34 vs 3.99), and the mortality HR was 7.34 for sarcopenia with or without osteoporosis higher than 3.99 for osteoporosis with/without sarcopenia. Interaction analysis was not feasible in the four-group comparison, as the interaction term overlapped with the 'both sarcopenia and osteoporosis' group; in the other three groups, the SP×OP interaction was not significant. SP patients were more likely to be older, male, and have lower body mass index, total tissue, and lean mass.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that sarcopenia may be a more important predictor of mortality than osteoporosis in patients, highlighting the need for muscle health assessment.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Interventions in Aging, is an online, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on concise rapid reporting of original research and reviews in aging. Special attention will be given to papers reporting on actual or potential clinical applications leading to improved prevention or treatment of disease or a greater understanding of pathological processes that result from maladaptive changes in the body associated with aging. This journal is directed at a wide array of scientists, engineers, pharmacists, pharmacologists and clinical specialists wishing to maintain an up to date knowledge of this exciting and emerging field.