Optimising knowledge mobilisation for mental health research in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of the state of knowledge and directions for future research.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Global Mental Health Pub Date : 2025-09-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/gmh.2025.10059
Cintia Faija, Penny Bee, Rebecca Pedley, Mia Bennion, Herni Susanti, Fitri Fausiah, Sri Idaiani, Dwie Susilo, Mohammad Hussen, Helen Brooks
{"title":"Optimising knowledge mobilisation for mental health research in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of the state of knowledge and directions for future research.","authors":"Cintia Faija, Penny Bee, Rebecca Pedley, Mia Bennion, Herni Susanti, Fitri Fausiah, Sri Idaiani, Dwie Susilo, Mohammad Hussen, Helen Brooks","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2025.10059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Optimising knowledge mobilisation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) could prove beneficial for improving mental health care, alleviating the global burden of high prevalence mental health problems and reducing inequalities. This review aimed to systematically review and synthesise the evidence on knowledge mobilisation for mental health improvement in LMICs, identifying barriers and facilitators and recommendations to guide progress. Four electronic databases were searched from inception to March 2024 using free text syntax combining synonyms of knowledge mobilisation, mental health and LMICs. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they were peer reviewed, on the topic of mental health and included evaluation data on knowledge mobilisation undertaken in LMICs. Included studies were quality assessed using the mixed-methods appraisal tool, and data extracted and synthesised narratively, complemented with the use of the framework for knowledge mobilisers and thematic analysis. Seventy-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Successful knowledge mobilisation within resource-constrained settings was supported by several key facilitators. These include promoting community participation, engaging local stakeholders from the start and maintaining that engagement and building trust through equitable, long-term partnerships. Using structured frameworks helps guide systematic involvement, while fostering local ownership and leadership ensures sustainability and relevance. Knowledge mobilisation in low-resource settings faced several barriers, including limited logistical and financial resources, low literacy levels and a general lack of awareness about psychological interventions. A lack of mental health-specific training and language or translation difficulties further hindered efforts to effectively mobilise and implement mental health knowledge. Future knowledge mobilisation efforts could be strengthened by fostering sustained, trust-based collaborations among stakeholders and engaging policymakers early to ensure optimal alignment and buy-in. Emphasising local beliefs and attitudes is crucial, as is creating inclusive, participatory environments that encourage broad community involvement. Employing culturally responsive, community-driven frameworks can enhance relevance and impact, while rigorous evaluation of mobilisation strategies is critical to guide future research investment and resource allocation. Mobilising mental health knowledge in LMIC shares principles with mobilising other types of knowledge but differs in focus, stakeholders and challenges due to the stigma of mental health problems, its complexity, cultural sensitivity, misconceptions and resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"e106"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12509166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2025.10059","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimising knowledge mobilisation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) could prove beneficial for improving mental health care, alleviating the global burden of high prevalence mental health problems and reducing inequalities. This review aimed to systematically review and synthesise the evidence on knowledge mobilisation for mental health improvement in LMICs, identifying barriers and facilitators and recommendations to guide progress. Four electronic databases were searched from inception to March 2024 using free text syntax combining synonyms of knowledge mobilisation, mental health and LMICs. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they were peer reviewed, on the topic of mental health and included evaluation data on knowledge mobilisation undertaken in LMICs. Included studies were quality assessed using the mixed-methods appraisal tool, and data extracted and synthesised narratively, complemented with the use of the framework for knowledge mobilisers and thematic analysis. Seventy-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Successful knowledge mobilisation within resource-constrained settings was supported by several key facilitators. These include promoting community participation, engaging local stakeholders from the start and maintaining that engagement and building trust through equitable, long-term partnerships. Using structured frameworks helps guide systematic involvement, while fostering local ownership and leadership ensures sustainability and relevance. Knowledge mobilisation in low-resource settings faced several barriers, including limited logistical and financial resources, low literacy levels and a general lack of awareness about psychological interventions. A lack of mental health-specific training and language or translation difficulties further hindered efforts to effectively mobilise and implement mental health knowledge. Future knowledge mobilisation efforts could be strengthened by fostering sustained, trust-based collaborations among stakeholders and engaging policymakers early to ensure optimal alignment and buy-in. Emphasising local beliefs and attitudes is crucial, as is creating inclusive, participatory environments that encourage broad community involvement. Employing culturally responsive, community-driven frameworks can enhance relevance and impact, while rigorous evaluation of mobilisation strategies is critical to guide future research investment and resource allocation. Mobilising mental health knowledge in LMIC shares principles with mobilising other types of knowledge but differs in focus, stakeholders and challenges due to the stigma of mental health problems, its complexity, cultural sensitivity, misconceptions and resistance.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

优化低收入和中等收入国家精神卫生研究的知识动员:对知识状况和未来研究方向的系统审查。
在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)优化知识动员,可能有助于改善精神卫生保健,减轻全球普遍存在的精神卫生问题负担,并减少不平等现象。本综述旨在系统地审查和综合关于调动知识以改善中低收入国家心理健康的证据,确定障碍和促进因素,并提出指导进展的建议。从建立到2024年3月,使用结合知识动员、心理健康和低收入国家同义词的自由文本语法对四个电子数据库进行检索。关于心理健康的文章如果经过同行评议,并包括中低收入国家开展的知识调动的评价数据,就有资格纳入。纳入的研究使用混合方法评估工具进行质量评估,并以叙述方式提取和综合数据,并使用知识动员和专题分析框架进行补充。78项研究符合纳入标准。在资源受限的情况下,成功的知识动员得到了几个关键促进因素的支持。这些措施包括促进社区参与,从一开始就吸引当地利益相关者,并通过公平的长期伙伴关系保持这种参与和建立信任。使用结构化框架有助于指导系统参与,同时促进地方所有权和领导,确保可持续性和相关性。在资源匮乏的环境中,知识动员面临着一些障碍,包括有限的后勤和财政资源、识字率低以及普遍缺乏对心理干预的认识。缺乏专门针对心理健康的培训以及语言或翻译方面的困难进一步阻碍了有效调动和运用心理健康知识的努力。未来的知识动员工作可以通过促进利益攸关方之间持续的、基于信任的合作和尽早让政策制定者参与来加强。强调当地的信仰和态度至关重要,同样重要的是创造包容的、参与性的环境,鼓励广泛的社区参与。采用对文化敏感的、社区驱动的框架可以增强相关性和影响,而对动员战略的严格评估对于指导未来的研究投资和资源分配至关重要。在低收入和中等收入国家调动精神卫生知识的原则与调动其他类型的知识相同,但由于精神卫生问题的污名化、其复杂性、文化敏感性、误解和阻力,在重点、利益攸关方和挑战方面有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Mental Health
Global Mental Health PSYCHIATRY-
自引率
5.10%
发文量
58
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: lobal Mental Health (GMH) is an Open Access journal that publishes papers that have a broad application of ‘the global point of view’ of mental health issues. The field of ‘global mental health’ is still emerging, reflecting a movement of advocacy and associated research driven by an agenda to remedy longstanding treatment gaps and disparities in care, access, and capacity. But these efforts and goals are also driving a potential reframing of knowledge in powerful ways, and positioning a new disciplinary approach to mental health. GMH seeks to cultivate and grow this emerging distinct discipline of ‘global mental health’, and the new knowledge and paradigms that should come from it.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信