{"title":"Literature as a Lens: Investigating Institutional Failures in Research Integrity through Fiction and Fact.","authors":"Christian J Wiedermann","doi":"10.1007/s11673-025-10477-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Boldt scandal, one of the largest documented cases of research misconduct globally, caused significant institutional failures in research oversight. These systemic issues at Justus Liebig University in Gießen, Germany played a critical role in enabling widespread data falsification and ethical violations. Benno von Bormann, a former collaborator of Joachim Boldt involved in the misconduct, subsequently authored the semi-fictional novel Das Hospital, which depicts hierarchical power dynamics and ethical dilemmas within a hospital setting. This book review examines how von Bormann's narrative parallels the documented institutional weaknesses that facilitated the Boldt scandal. By comparing insights from the University of Gießen's investigation report, as summarized in publicly available sources, and the themes in Das Hospital, a unique interdisciplinary analysis of institutional responsibility is offered. The twin-pronged approach sheds light on the systemic conditions that may encourage unethical research behaviours, potentially leading to corresponding patterns of research withdrawals in areas and disciplines where such practices are notably prevalent. This study concludes by revisiting approaches to enhance transparency, accountability, and cultural changes in research management. This underscores the importance of combining literary analysis with factual examination of institutions to tackle ongoing issues in upholding research integrity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-025-10477-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Boldt scandal, one of the largest documented cases of research misconduct globally, caused significant institutional failures in research oversight. These systemic issues at Justus Liebig University in Gießen, Germany played a critical role in enabling widespread data falsification and ethical violations. Benno von Bormann, a former collaborator of Joachim Boldt involved in the misconduct, subsequently authored the semi-fictional novel Das Hospital, which depicts hierarchical power dynamics and ethical dilemmas within a hospital setting. This book review examines how von Bormann's narrative parallels the documented institutional weaknesses that facilitated the Boldt scandal. By comparing insights from the University of Gießen's investigation report, as summarized in publicly available sources, and the themes in Das Hospital, a unique interdisciplinary analysis of institutional responsibility is offered. The twin-pronged approach sheds light on the systemic conditions that may encourage unethical research behaviours, potentially leading to corresponding patterns of research withdrawals in areas and disciplines where such practices are notably prevalent. This study concludes by revisiting approaches to enhance transparency, accountability, and cultural changes in research management. This underscores the importance of combining literary analysis with factual examination of institutions to tackle ongoing issues in upholding research integrity.
期刊介绍:
The JBI welcomes both reports of empirical research and articles that increase theoretical understanding of medicine and health care, the health professions and the biological sciences. The JBI is also open to critical reflections on medicine and conventional bioethics, the nature of health, illness and disability, the sources of ethics, the nature of ethical communities, and possible implications of new developments in science and technology for social and cultural life and human identity. We welcome contributions from perspectives that are less commonly published in existing journals in the field and reports of empirical research studies using both qualitative and quantitative methodologies.
The JBI accepts contributions from authors working in or across disciplines including – but not limited to – the following:
-philosophy-
bioethics-
economics-
social theory-
law-
public health and epidemiology-
anthropology-
psychology-
feminism-
gay and lesbian studies-
linguistics and discourse analysis-
cultural studies-
disability studies-
history-
literature and literary studies-
environmental sciences-
theology and religious studies