From Nano to Quantum: Ethics Through a Lens of Continuity.

IF 3 2区 哲学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Clare Shelley-Egan, Eline De Jong
{"title":"From Nano to Quantum: Ethics Through a Lens of Continuity.","authors":"Clare Shelley-Egan, Eline De Jong","doi":"10.1007/s11948-025-00557-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A significant amount of scholarship and funding has been dedicated to ethical and social studies of new and emerging science and technology (NEST), from nanotechnology to synthetic biology, and Artificial Intelligence. Quantum technologies comprise the latest NEST attracting interest from scholarship in the social sciences and humanities. While there is a small community now emerging around broader discussion of quantum technologies in society, the concepts of ethics of quantum technologies and responsible innovation are still fluid. In this article, we argue that lessons from previous instances of NEST can offer important insights into the early stages of quantum technology discourse and development. In the embryonic stages of discourse around NEST, there is often an undue emphasis on the novelty of ethical issues, leading to speculation and misplaced resources and energy. Using a lens of continuity, we revisit experiences and lessons from nanotechnology discourse. Zooming in on key characteristics of the nanoethics discourse, we use these features as analytical tools with which to assess and analyse emerging discourse around quantum technologies. We point to continuities between nano and quantum discourse, including the focus on 'responsible' or 'good' technology; the intensification of ethical issues brought about by enabling technologies; the limitations and risks of speculative ethics; the effects of ambivalence on the framing of ethics; and the importance of paying attention to the present. These issues are taken forward to avoid 'reinventing the wheel' and to offer guidance in shaping the ethics discourse around quantum technologies into a more focused and effective debate.</p>","PeriodicalId":49564,"journal":{"name":"Science and Engineering Ethics","volume":"31 5","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518464/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Engineering Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-025-00557-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A significant amount of scholarship and funding has been dedicated to ethical and social studies of new and emerging science and technology (NEST), from nanotechnology to synthetic biology, and Artificial Intelligence. Quantum technologies comprise the latest NEST attracting interest from scholarship in the social sciences and humanities. While there is a small community now emerging around broader discussion of quantum technologies in society, the concepts of ethics of quantum technologies and responsible innovation are still fluid. In this article, we argue that lessons from previous instances of NEST can offer important insights into the early stages of quantum technology discourse and development. In the embryonic stages of discourse around NEST, there is often an undue emphasis on the novelty of ethical issues, leading to speculation and misplaced resources and energy. Using a lens of continuity, we revisit experiences and lessons from nanotechnology discourse. Zooming in on key characteristics of the nanoethics discourse, we use these features as analytical tools with which to assess and analyse emerging discourse around quantum technologies. We point to continuities between nano and quantum discourse, including the focus on 'responsible' or 'good' technology; the intensification of ethical issues brought about by enabling technologies; the limitations and risks of speculative ethics; the effects of ambivalence on the framing of ethics; and the importance of paying attention to the present. These issues are taken forward to avoid 'reinventing the wheel' and to offer guidance in shaping the ethics discourse around quantum technologies into a more focused and effective debate.

从纳米到量子:连续性镜头下的伦理学。
大量的奖学金和资金一直致力于新兴科学技术(NEST)的伦理和社会研究,从纳米技术到合成生物学和人工智能。量子技术构成了最新的NEST,吸引了社会科学和人文学科学者的兴趣。虽然现在有一个小社区围绕着社会上更广泛的量子技术讨论而出现,但量子技术的伦理概念和负责任的创新仍然是不稳定的。在本文中,我们认为从以前的NEST实例中吸取的教训可以为量子技术话语和发展的早期阶段提供重要的见解。在围绕NEST的讨论的萌芽阶段,往往过分强调伦理问题的新颖性,导致猜测和资源和精力的错位。使用连续性的镜头,我们重新审视纳米技术话语的经验和教训。放大纳米伦理学话语的关键特征,我们使用这些特征作为分析工具来评估和分析围绕量子技术的新兴话语。我们指出纳米和量子话语之间的连续性,包括对“负责任”或“好”技术的关注;使能技术所带来的伦理问题的加剧;思辨伦理的局限性与风险矛盾心理对伦理建构的影响以及关注当下的重要性。提出这些问题是为了避免“重新发明轮子”,并为将围绕量子技术的伦理话语塑造成更集中、更有效的辩论提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science and Engineering Ethics
Science and Engineering Ethics 综合性期刊-工程:综合
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
5.40%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Science and Engineering Ethics is an international multidisciplinary journal dedicated to exploring ethical issues associated with science and engineering, covering professional education, research and practice as well as the effects of technological innovations and research findings on society. While the focus of this journal is on science and engineering, contributions from a broad range of disciplines, including social sciences and humanities, are welcomed. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to, ethics of new and emerging technologies, research ethics, computer ethics, energy ethics, animals and human subjects ethics, ethics education in science and engineering, ethics in design, biomedical ethics, values in technology and innovation. We welcome contributions that deal with these issues from an international perspective, particularly from countries that are underrepresented in these discussions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信