{"title":"Applying an Automatic Classifier for Child-Directed Speech to Intervention Research: A Reanalysis","authors":"Naja Ferjan Ramírez, Aeddan Claflin","doi":"10.1111/desc.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Parental language input is a key predictor of child language achievement. Parentese is a widely used style of child-directed speech (CDS) distinguished by a higher pitch and larger pitch range. A recent parent coaching randomized control trial (Parentese-RCT) demonstrated that English-speaking US parents who were coached to use parentese with their 6- to 18-month-olds increased the frequency of its use; their children showed enhanced language outcomes at 18 months. While these results are exciting, a roadblock in scaling this intervention is the fact that parentese has to be manually identified from daylong LENA recordings. Here we demonstrate that a newly developed CDS classifier captures the effect of this Parentese-RCT <i>without human annotation</i>, through a new variable: Proportion of CDS relative to all adult speech (CDS-Proportion). Two daylong recordings per child (<i>N</i> = 70) per timepoint (child age: 6, 10, 14, and 18 months) from the Parentese-RCT were re-analyzed by removing periods of sleep and estimating CDS-Proportion through the classifier. As was the case for parentese in the Parentese-RCT, CDS-Proportion was significantly enhanced in the intervention group. Moreover, the change over time in CDS-Proportion was significantly and positively correlated with infants’ word use at 18 months. We emphasize that the classifier does <i>not</i> “recognize parentese.” Likewise, CDS-Proportion is <i>not</i> a proxy for parentese, but rather, a variable related to parentese in complex ways. The present findings suggest a promising future for scalability of interventions using daylong recordings in combination with novel technologies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Summary</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Language interventions promote verbal engagement between caregivers and children; however, to be effective, these interventions need to be scalable.</li>\n \n <li>Language interventions have relied on manual (human) annotation to identify parental language behaviors that are linked to children's outcomes.</li>\n \n <li>An automated classifier for Child-Directed-Speech was applied to capture the effect of a previously published parent-coaching intervention, without human annotation.</li>\n \n <li>Novel technologies have the potential to enhance the scalability of parent interventions that focus on social language behaviors.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"28 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.70079","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Parental language input is a key predictor of child language achievement. Parentese is a widely used style of child-directed speech (CDS) distinguished by a higher pitch and larger pitch range. A recent parent coaching randomized control trial (Parentese-RCT) demonstrated that English-speaking US parents who were coached to use parentese with their 6- to 18-month-olds increased the frequency of its use; their children showed enhanced language outcomes at 18 months. While these results are exciting, a roadblock in scaling this intervention is the fact that parentese has to be manually identified from daylong LENA recordings. Here we demonstrate that a newly developed CDS classifier captures the effect of this Parentese-RCT without human annotation, through a new variable: Proportion of CDS relative to all adult speech (CDS-Proportion). Two daylong recordings per child (N = 70) per timepoint (child age: 6, 10, 14, and 18 months) from the Parentese-RCT were re-analyzed by removing periods of sleep and estimating CDS-Proportion through the classifier. As was the case for parentese in the Parentese-RCT, CDS-Proportion was significantly enhanced in the intervention group. Moreover, the change over time in CDS-Proportion was significantly and positively correlated with infants’ word use at 18 months. We emphasize that the classifier does not “recognize parentese.” Likewise, CDS-Proportion is not a proxy for parentese, but rather, a variable related to parentese in complex ways. The present findings suggest a promising future for scalability of interventions using daylong recordings in combination with novel technologies.
Summary
Language interventions promote verbal engagement between caregivers and children; however, to be effective, these interventions need to be scalable.
Language interventions have relied on manual (human) annotation to identify parental language behaviors that are linked to children's outcomes.
An automated classifier for Child-Directed-Speech was applied to capture the effect of a previously published parent-coaching intervention, without human annotation.
Novel technologies have the potential to enhance the scalability of parent interventions that focus on social language behaviors.
期刊介绍:
Developmental Science publishes cutting-edge theory and up-to-the-minute research on scientific developmental psychology from leading thinkers in the field. It is currently the only journal that specifically focuses on human developmental cognitive neuroscience. Coverage includes: - Clinical, computational and comparative approaches to development - Key advances in cognitive and social development - Developmental cognitive neuroscience - Functional neuroimaging of the developing brain